黄河某高拱坝岩体力学参数的选取

›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (S2): 478-483.

黄河某高拱坝岩体力学参数的选取

戚炜^{1, 2, 3}，王勇智^{1, 2, 3}，姜伏伟⁴

1. 长安大学地质工程与测绘学院，西安 710054；2. 长安大学西部地质资源与地质工程教育部重点实验室，西安 710054； 3. 长安大学国土资源部岩土工程开放研究实验室，西安 710054；4. 东华理工大学土木工程与环境学院，江西抚州 344000

收稿日期:2010-12-08 出版日期:2011-08-10 发布日期:2011-08-26
作者简介:戚炜，女，1974年生，博士，讲师，主要从事地质工程的教学研究

Determination of mechanical parameters of rock mass at a high arch dam on Yellow River

QI Wei^{1, 2, 3}, WANG Yong-zhi^{1, 2, 3}, JIANG Fu-wei ⁴

1. College of Geology Engineering and Surveying, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Western Geology Resources and Geology Engineering, Ministry of Education, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China; 3. Open Research Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering under the Ministry of Land and Resources, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China; 4. College of Civil & Environment Engineering, East China Institute of Technology, Fuzhou, Jiangxi 344000, China

Received:2010-12-08 Online:2011-08-10 Published:2011-08-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在对比国内外各种选取岩体力学参数方法的基础上，对黄河某高拱坝坝址区主要岩层中生代二长岩和三叠系变质砂岩采用现场原位试验和数据统计方法获取岩体力学参数。用刚性圆形承压板法进行岩体变形试验，建立了岩体纵波波速与变形模量的拟合关系，用最小二乘回归法处理变形数据。用平推法直剪试验进行岩体抗剪断强度试验，用 - 点群中心法处理直剪试验数据。软弱带取样后进行室内断层泥物理力学性质试验，运用岩土工程勘察规范中参数统计经验公式来获得各软弱带的抗剪参数。点群法求得的各抗剪指标总体上与原位试验得到的结果相一致，证明该法可用于岩体力学参数选取。

关键词: 高拱坝, 岩体力学, 变形模量, 抗剪强度, 最小二乘回归法, 点群中心法

Abstract: Different determination methods of mechanical parameters of rocks at home and abroad are contrasted. In-situ tests are made on Mesozoic monzonite and Triassic metamorphic sandstone at dam site. Statistical methods are used in order to determine rock mechanical parameters. Rigid circular bearing plate is used for rock mass deformation test. Then the fitting relationships between the longitudinal wave velocity of rock masses and deformation moduli are established. Method of least square regression is used for deformation data processing. Horizontally pushing lifting jack of direct shear tests are operated on rock mass shear strength test. - center point group analysis is used for treating shear test data. Fault gouge samples obtained from the weak layers are brought to indoor lab physico-mechanical test. Shear parameters of weak intercalated layers gouge are obtained by means of statistical empirical formula in the Technical Code for Investigation of Geotechnical Engineering GB50021-2001. The shearing strength parameters obtained by point groups are generally consistent with parameters obtained by in-situ test. So it is reliable.

Key words: high arch dam, mechanics of rock mass, deformation modulus, shearing strength, method of least square regression, point group analysis

中图分类号:

TU 456

戚炜，王勇智，姜伏伟. 黄河某高拱坝岩体力学参数的选取[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 478-483.

QI Wei , WANG Yong-zhi , JIANG Fu-wei. Determination of mechanical parameters of rock mass at a high arch dam on Yellow River[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 478-483.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[2]	李小刚, 朱长歧, 崔翔, 张珀瑜, 王睿, . 含碳酸盐混合砂的三轴剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 123-131.
[3]	张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[4]	王欢, 陈群, 王红鑫, 张文举, . 不同压实度和基质吸力的粉煤灰三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
[5]	郑耀林, 章荣军, 郑俊杰, 董超强, 陆展, . 絮凝-固化联合处理超高含水率吹填淤泥浆的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3107-3114.
[6]	洪本根, 罗嗣海, 胡世丽, 王观石, 姚康, . 基质吸力对非饱和离子型稀土抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2303-2310.
[7]	周小文, 程力, 周密, 王齐, . 离心机中球形贯入仪贯入黏土特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[8]	付宏渊, 刘杰, 曾铃, 卞汉兵, 史振宁, . 考虑荷载与浸水条件的预崩解炭质泥岩变形与强度试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1273-1280.
[9]	张景科, 单婷婷, 王玉超, 王南, 樊孟, 赵林毅, . 土遗址锚固土体-浆体（CGN+C）界面力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 903-912.
[10]	邱敏, 袁青, 李长俊, 肖超超, . 基于孔穴扩张理论的黏土不排水抗剪强度计算方法对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1059-1066.
[11]	周建, 蔡露, 罗凌晖, 应宏伟, . 各向异性软土基坑抗隆起稳定极限平衡分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4848-4856.
[12]	李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 原状膨胀土剪切力学特性的卸荷速率效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3758-3766.
[13]	李深圳, 沙鹏, 伍法权, 伍劼. 层状结构岩体变形的各向异性特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 366-373.
[14]	陈曦, 曾亚武, 孙翰卿, 任树林, 刘伟. 岩石节理峰值抗剪强度新模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 123-130.
[15]	张磊, 刘慧, 王铁行. 固结与不固结条件下黄土-混凝土接触面剪切试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 238-244.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed