黄河口不同强度粉土液化特性的试验研究

›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 2692-2696.

黄河口不同强度粉土液化特性的试验研究

常方强^{1, 2}，贾永刚²

1. 华侨大学土木工程学院，福建厦门 361021；2. 中国海洋大学环境科学与工程学院，山东青岛 266110

收稿日期:2010-01-08 出版日期:2011-09-10 发布日期:2011-09-13
作者简介:常方强，男，1980年生，博士，讲师，从事环境岩土灾害研究及教学工作
基金资助:
华侨大学高层次人才科研启动项目（No. 09BS621）；国家自然科学基金（No. 40876042）；国家863攻关项目（No. 2008AA09Z109）。

Liquefaction characteristics of silts with different strengths at Yellow River estuary

CHANG Fang-qiang^{1, 2}，JIA Yong-gang²

1. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, Fujian 361021, China; 2. Faculty of Environmental Science & Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong 266110, China

Received:2010-01-08 Online:2011-09-10 Published:2011-09-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研制真空压缩装置以制备不同强度的粉土土样，并进行动三轴试验，测试不同强度粉土的液化特性。建立了土的强度与动剪应力比的关系，确立孔压增长模型及其参数，探讨土的强度和动应力对液化的影响。结果表明，（1）真空压缩装置制备土样过程中，土体超孔压在24 h内基本消散完毕，28 d贯入阻力达300～400 N，不排水抗剪强度达8 kPa，达到黄河口软弱土的强度；（2）土的强度与动剪应力比基本呈线性关系，且土的强度越高，孔压增长曲线越呈现上凸趋势，破坏时的孔压比也越大；（3）指数模型能够较好模拟黄河口粉土孔压增长情况，其中参数a和b分别位于0.77～5.63和0.17～4.65之间；对于孔压比上限，参数a, b分别为0.92和4.65；孔压比下限，参数a, b分别为1.25和0.89。

关键词: 黄河口, 粉土, 液化, 强度

Abstract: A vacuum compression device is developed for preparing silt soil samples with different strengths, and triaxial test is performed for measuring liquefaction characteristics of those soil samples. The relationship between soil strength and cyclic shear stress ratio, pore pressure growth model and its parameters are established; and the impact of the soil strength and the dynamic stress on the liquefaction is discussed. Some conclusions are drawn as follows. (1) During soil samples preparation in the vacuum compression device, excess pore pressure dissipated completely within 24 hours, penetration resistance up to 300-400 N; undrained shear strength up to 8 kPa, reached weak soil strength at the Yellow River estuary. (2) The relationship between soil strength and cyclic shear stress ratio is basically linear; and the higher soil strength, curve of pore pressure on the growth showing the more convex trend, the greater pore pressure ratio reached when destroyed. (3) Index model can better simulate pore-water pressure growth of silt at the Yellow River estuary, where the parameters a and b are located between 0.77-5.63 and 0.17-4.65, respectively; for the pore pressure ratio upper limit, the parameters a and b are 0.92 and 4.65 respectively; for pore pressure lower limit, the parameters a and b are 1.25 and 0.89 respectively.

Key words: Yellow River estuary, silt, liquefaction, strength

中图分类号:

TU 411+.2

常方强，贾永刚. 黄河口不同强度粉土液化特性的试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2692-2696.

CHANG Fang-qiang ，JIA Yong-gang. Liquefaction characteristics of silts with different strengths at Yellow River estuary[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2692-2696.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[2]	李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[3]	樊科伟, 刘斯宏, 廖洁, 方斌昕, 王建磊, . 袋装石土工袋剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 477-484.
[4]	刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 杨建军, 孙嘉宝, . 部分排水条件下饱和黏土渐近状态本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 485-491.
[5]	马维嘉, 陈国兴, 吴琪, . 复杂加载条件下珊瑚砂抗液化强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 535-542.
[6]	王峰, 张建清, . 考虑颗粒强度尺寸效应的原型堆石料破碎特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 87-94.
[7]	熊辉, 杨丰, . 文克尔地基模型下液化土桩基水平振动响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 103-110.
[8]	李小刚, 朱长歧, 崔翔, 张珀瑜, 王睿, . 含碳酸盐混合砂的三轴剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 123-131.
[9]	郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[10]	尹光志, 鲁俊, 张东明, 李铭辉, 邓博知, 刘超, . 真三轴应力条件下钻孔围岩塑性区及增透半径研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 1-10.
[11]	张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[12]	王欢, 陈群, 王红鑫, 张文举, . 不同压实度和基质吸力的粉煤灰三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
[13]	高运昌, 高盟, 尹诗, . 聚氨酯固化海砂的静力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 231-236.
[14]	谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[15]	柴维, 龙志林, 旷杜敏, 陈佳敏, 闫超萍. 直剪剪切速率对钙质砂强度及变形特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 359-366.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed