›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 2798-2802.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于滑体渗透性与库水变动的滑坡稳定性变化规律研究

宋 琨1,晏鄂川1, 2,朱大鹏1,赵庆远1   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,武汉 430074;2. 教育部长江三峡库区地质灾害研究中心,武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-01 出版日期:2011-09-10 发布日期:2011-09-13
  • 作者简介:宋琨,男,1983年生,博士研究生,主要研究方向为岩土体稳定性评价与防治
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(No. 2011CB710605);三峡库区三期地质灾害防治监测预警工程项目(No. SXJC-3ZH1D1_合[2009]003)

Base on permeability of landslide and reservoir water change to research variational regularity of landslide stability

SONG Kun1,YAN E-chuan1, 2,ZHU Da-peng1,ZHAO Qing-yuan1   

  1. 1. Faculty of Engineering,China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; 2. Three Gorges Research Center for Geo-hazard, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2010-04-01 Online:2011-09-10 Published:2011-09-13

摘要: 在三峡工程试运行期间,库区滑坡因地质结构和渗透性的不同,其变形情况存在明显差异,因此,除研究滑坡地质结构外,还应加强不同渗透性滑坡在库水变动下的稳定性响应规律研究。以三峡水库库首区黄荆树滑坡实例为计算模型,分析库水位在175~145 m间以0.5~2.0 m/d变化时4种不同渗透性滑坡的渗流场特征;再以库水影响系数? 和稳定性变化率为评价指标,研究在滑体渗透性和库水变动条件下的滑坡稳定性变化规律。研究表明,当库水影响系数? 在-0.107~-0.322时,稳定性变化率? 最大,且随? 减小滑坡稳定性增加率? 减小;当? 在-0.644~-769.231时,随? 减小稳定性增加率? 变化不明显;当? 在576.923~769.231时,库水位上升时滑坡稳定性降低较少;当? 在0.107~384.615时,影响系数? 与稳定性变化率? 的相关性不明显。其结果对于库区滑坡的监测预警有较强的应用价值

关键词: 水位变化, 渗透性, 水库滑坡, 库水影响系数, 稳定性变化率

Abstract: During the trial operation of the Three Gorges Project, there are remarkable differences between the deformation of landslides due to different geological conditions and permeabilities. Therefore, besides the geological structure, more attention should be paid to study the regularity of stability variation of different permeability landslides under the condition of reservoir level change. Taking the Huangjingshu landslide at the head area of the Three Gorges as the computation model, the seepage field of 4 landslides with different permeabilities are studied as the water level changes at a steady speed from 0.5 m/d to 2.0 m/d. As the evaluation index, reservoir water influence coefficient, the ratio of water level change speed to permeability coefficient, and stability change ratio is proposed. And the regularity of stability variation is obtained under the condition of permeability and water level change. The results show that when the reservoir water influence coefficient ? changes from -0.107 to -0.322, the stability change ratio ? is the largest; and the ? decreases as ? reduces. When ? changes from-0.644 to -769.231, the ? almost unchanged as ? decreased. When ? changes from 576.923 to 769.231, the reservoir filling had less effect on the landslide stability. When α changes from 0.107 to 384.615, the correlation of ? and ? is not obvious. It has some values for the landslide monitoring and warning in the Three Gorges reservoir area

Key words: reservoir level change, permeability, reservoir landslide, reservoir water influence coefficient, rate of stability change

中图分类号: 

  • P 642
[1] 李玲, 刘金泉, 刘造保, 刘桃根, 王伟, 邵建富, . 砂-黏土混合物高压压实性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3502-3514.
[2] 沈泰宇, 汪时机, 薛乐, 李贤, 何丙辉, . 微生物沉积碳酸钙固化砂质黏性紫色土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3115-3124.
[3] 李 崴, 王者超, 毕丽平, 刘 杰, . 辐射流条件下裂隙岩体渗透性表征单元体尺寸 与等效渗透系数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 720-727.
[4] 董金玉,王 闯,周建军,杨继红,李严威,. 泡沫改良砂卵石土的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 140-148.
[5] 左宇军,孙文吉斌,邬忠虎,许云飞,. 渗透压–应力耦合作用下页岩渗透性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3253-3260.
[6] 杨建民,霍王文,. 渗透性水平向各向异性导致椭圆形地面沉降漏斗的一个性质[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2960-2976.
[7] 任玉宾,王 胤,杨 庆. 颗粒级配与形状对钙质砂渗透性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 491-497.
[8] 张 强,李小春,胡少斌,牛智勇,汪 芳,范 坤,邵光强,. 高应力下花岗岩耦合节理在剪切过程中渗透率演化特性[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3641-3650.
[9] 张豫川,姚永国,周 泓,. 长龄期改良黄土抗剪强度与渗透性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 170-176.
[10] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土地基渗透性条件对基坑预降水过程中支护墙侧移的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3039-3047.
[11] 鲍树峰,娄 炎,董志良,牛 飞,谢荣星, . 负压环境下新型地下水位测试装置研发[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3067-3073.
[12] 秦鹏飞. 微生物灌浆的颗粒流细观力学数值模拟研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 603-608.
[13] 张虎元,彭 宇,王学文,林澄斌,. 抗疏力固化剂改性黄土进失水能力研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 19-26.
[14] 王铁行,杨 涛,鲁 洁. 干密度及冻融循环对黄土渗透性的各向异性影响[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 72-78.
[15] 马少坤,邵 羽,吕 虎,WONG K S ,吴宏伟,陈 欣,江 杰,. 地下水位循环变化时隧道开挖对群桩的长期影响研究[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1563-1568.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李鸿博,郭小红. 公路连拱隧道土压力荷载的计算方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3429 -3434 .
[2] 瞿万波,刘新荣,傅晏,秦晓英. 洞桩法大断面群洞交叉隧道初衬数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2799 -2804 .
[3] 王川婴,胡培良,孙卫春. 基于钻孔摄像技术的岩体完整性评价方法[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1326 -1330 .
[4] 谈云志,孔令伟,郭爱国,万 智. 压实红黏土水分传输的毛细效应与数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2289 -2294 .
[5] 王生新,陆勇翔,尹亚雄,郭定一. 碎石土湿陷性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2373 -2377 .
[6] 王云岗,熊 凯,凌道盛. 基于平动加转动运动场的边坡稳定上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2619 -2624 .
[7] 龙 照,赵明华,张恩祥,刘峻龙. 锚杆临界锚固长度简化计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2991 -2994 .
[8] 史旦达,周 健,贾敏才,杨永香. 考虑蠕变性状的港区软土地基参数反演和长期沉降预测[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 746 -750 .
[9] 邓宗伟,冷伍明,李志勇,岳志平. 喷混凝土边坡温度场与应力场耦合的有限元时效分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1153 -1158 .
[10] 杨建平,陈卫忠,戴永浩. 裂隙岩体变形模量尺寸效应研究Ⅰ:有限元法[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1538 -1545 .