优化复合锚固结构与单一锚固结构抗爆性能对比试验研究

›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 3019-3025.

优化复合锚固结构与单一锚固结构抗爆性能对比试验研究

赵林^{1, 3}，曾宪明²，李世民²，林大路²，陆卫国²

1.湖南大学土木工程学院，长沙 410082；2.总参工程兵科研三所，河南洛阳 471023；3.河南科技大学建筑工程学院，河南洛阳 471004

收稿日期:2011-05-03 出版日期:2011-10-10 发布日期:2011-10-13
作者简介:赵林，男，1966年生，博士研究生，高工，主要从事岩石力学试验研究方面的工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（No. 10772199）

Comparative test study of blast-resistance performance of optimal composite anchorage structure and single anchorage structure

ZHAO Lin^{1, 3}, ZENG Xian-ming², LI Shi-min², LIN Da-lu², LU Wei-guo²

1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China; 2. The Third Engineer Scientific Research Institute of the Headquarters of the General Staff, Luoyang, Henan 471023, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan 471004, China

Received:2011-05-03 Online:2011-10-10 Published:2011-10-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 优化复合锚固结构是由土钉和在土钉端部系统而规律地设置的一定长度的经特殊处理的空孔段群组成。空孔群在围岩介质中造成一个弱化区，弱化区介于支护结构与围岩介质之间，将原有的二介质系统（支护结构和围岩），改变为三介质系统（支护结构、弱化区和围岩）。爆炸条件下，优先由弱化区产生变形、破碎、压实或压密，同时大量吸收爆炸能，使支护结构的危机得以转移至弱化区而本身不受损。优化复合锚固结构对比单一锚固结构具有优异的抗动静载性能。因此进行对比试验，研究优化复合锚固结构及单一锚固结构的抗爆性能。试验结果表明，在支护结构产生临界破坏前后，单一锚固结构的质点加速度量值是优化复合锚固结构的2.22倍以上，前者的动应变量值是后者的5.30～4.50倍以上。在临界破坏条件下，优化复合锚固结构的抗力是单一锚固结构的5.10倍以上，在极限破坏状条件下，前者是后者的4.13～3.40倍以上。

关键词: 优化复合锚固结构, 单一锚固结构, 抗爆性能, 对比研究

Abstract: The optimal composite anchorage structure is constituted by soil nail and groups of fixed-length empty holes that regular setting in the end of soil nail. Empty holes caused a weakened zone in the surrounding rock. The weakened zone is between the reinforced support structure and the surround rock. It changes the original two-medium system into three-medium system. Under the explosion condition, weakened zone is firstly deformed, cracked, crushed or densified; and at the same time, a great deal of blast energy is absorbed. Therefore, the crisis of the reinforced support structure is transferred into the weakened zone. The optimal composite anchorage structure has excellent blast-resistance. The test results of the compression test of optimal composite anchorage structure and single anchorage structure show that the particle acceleration of single anchorage structure is 2.22 times higher than that of the optimal composite anchorage structure. The dynamic strain of the former is 5.30-4.50 times higher than that of the latter. The blast-resistance of the optimal composite anchorage structure is 5.10 times higher than that of the single anchorage structure. Under the limit damage condition, the former is 4.13-3.40 times higher than that of the latter

Key words: optimal composite anchorage structure, single anchorage structure, blast-resistance, comparative study

中图分类号:

TU 942

赵林，曾宪明，李世民，林大路，陆卫国. 优化复合锚固结构与单一锚固结构抗爆性能对比试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3019-3025.

ZHAO Lin , ZENG Xian-ming , LI Shi-min , LIN Da-lu , LU Wei-guo. Comparative test study of blast-resistance performance of optimal composite anchorage structure and single anchorage structure[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3019-3025.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	许宏发，佟佺，王广建，王德荣 . 坑道口部管棚加固抗爆性能模型试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(11): 3219-3224.
[2]	徐景茂，顾金才，陈安敏，张向阳，明治清 . 锚杆长度和间距对洞室抗爆性能影响研究[J]. , 2012, 33(11): 3489-3496.
[3]	赵林，曾宪明　，李世民　，林大路　，陆卫国　. 优化与非优化复合锚固结构抗爆性能对比试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 76-82.
[4]	陈金锋，宋二祥，徐明. 强度折减有限元法在昆明新机场高填方边坡稳定分析中的应用[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 636-0641.
[5]	王光勇，顾金才，陈安敏，徐景茂，张向阳. 全长粘结式锚杆加固洞室抗爆性能试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 107-112.
[6]	赵健，曾宪明，孙杰，李世民，林大路. 新型锚固类结构抗爆性能数值分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 255-259.
[7]	杨建民. 深层软基加固处理方案试验研究[J]. , 2008, 29(7): 1981-1986.