›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 3597-3603.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

尾砂胶结块体压缩及粉化特性试验研究

田阳辉,李小春,魏 宁   

  1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2010-08-19 出版日期:2011-12-10 发布日期:2011-12-13
  • 作者简介:田阳辉,男,1985生,硕士研究生,主要从事矿山地质灾害和公路路基设计研究

Experimental study of characteristics of compression and pulverization for cemented tailings blocks

TIAN Yang-hui, LI Xiao-chun, WEI Ning   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2010-08-19 Online:2011-12-10 Published:2011-12-13

摘要: 地下采矿引起了地表塌陷和错动;尾矿库储存尾砂能力有限,同时又受到征地限制。为综合解决这两个问题,针对金山店铁矿现状,采用半干胶结块体充填塌陷区。但在上覆和周围岩层再塌陷过程中,充填块体易破碎粉化并诱发深部采空区泥石流。因此,需要研究塌陷后充填块体的粉化率以及诱发泥石流的可能性。为此,分别对抗压强度为1、3 MPa的尾砂胶结块体和抗压强度为6 MPa的尾砂胶结块体与废石混合体进行分级压缩,并记录竖向应力-应变;当加载到某一级荷载胶结块体发生破碎并粉化时,取样进行颗粒筛分试验,分析破碎块体的粒径分布曲线。对试验结果分析可得,在采空区发生塌陷压缩胶结块体时,各种状态下的块体粉化率为8%~15%;胶结块体与废石混合充填,可有效降低围岩塌陷后充填体破碎的块体粉化率,结合泥石流试验结果,尾砂胶结块体充填诱发泥石流的可能性较小;即使发生,也能保证矿区井下正常生产

关键词: 充填, 尾砂, 压缩, 级配, 粉化率, 泥石流

Abstract: It formed a subsidence area and expanded the offset in surface because of underground mining. The mine waste reservoir was limited to storage much more tailings and expropriation was restricted by limited land. In order to solve these two problems, it was intended to backfill the disease area with semi-dry cemented blocks about the actualities in Jinshandian Iron Mine. When the overlying and surrounding strata collapse again, the filling block will be broken and pulverized easily, and which would induce debris flow in mined-out area. Therefore, there need to study the tailings' pulverization rate when the surface collapses again and the possibility of inducing debris flow. Accordingly, the cemented tailings blocks with strength of 1 MPa and 3 MPa were compressed level-to-level respectively. The mixture with the cemented tailings blocks with strength of 6 MPa was compressed level-to-level too. While it was compressed, the vertical stress and strain were recorded. When the cemented blocks were crushed and pulverized in some load level, some samples were taken to do screening test and study the curve of broken blocks’ particle size distribution. According to the results of experiments as follows, when the collapse appeared in mined-out area and the cemented blocks may be compressed, the failure fillings’ pulverulent ratio was 8%-15%. The failure fillings’ pulverulent ratio can be reduced by filling the mixture which contains cemented blocks and waste rocks when surrounding rocks collapse. Combined the results of debris flow test, the possibility of debris flow was little; even if it has, it can also ensure the normal production in underground mining area

Key words: backfill, tailings, compression, gradation, pulverization rate, debris flow

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 高峰, 曹善鹏, 熊信, 周科平, 朱龙胤, . 冻融循环作用下受荷青砂岩的脆性演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 445-452.
[2] 吴二鲁, 朱俊高, 郭万里, 陆阳洋. 基于级配方程的粗粒料压实特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 214-220.
[3] 王龙, 朱俊高, 郭万里, 陆阳洋, . 无黏性土压缩模型及其验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 229-234.
[4] 周翠英, 梁宁, 刘镇, . 红层软岩压缩破坏的分形特征与级联失效过程[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 21-31.
[5] 刘华, 张硕成, 牛富俊, 邵珠山, 牛泽林, 鲁洁, . 酸碱污染Q3黄土的一维压缩特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 210-216.
[6] 刘希灵, 刘周, 李夕兵, 韩梦思. 单轴压缩与劈裂荷载下灰岩声发射b值特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 267-274.
[7] 徐浩青, 周爱兆, 姜朋明, 刘顺青, 宋苗苗, 陈亮, . 不同砂−膨润土垂直防渗墙填筑土料的掺量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 424-430.
[8] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[9] 韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[10] 王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[11] 许江, 邬君宇, 刘义鑫, 雷娇, . 不同充填度下岩体剪切−渗流耦合试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3416-3424.
[12] 李玲, 刘金泉, 刘造保, 刘桃根, 王伟, 邵建富, . 砂-黏土混合物高压压实性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3502-3514.
[13] 程爱平, 张玉山, 戴顺意, 董福松, 曾文旭, 李丹峰, . 单轴压缩胶结充填体声发射参数 时空演化规律及破裂预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2965-2974.
[14] 毛小龙, 刘月田, 关文龙, 任兴南, 冯月丽, 丁祖鹏, . 一种适用于孔隙体积应变的有效应力方程[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3004-3010.
[15] 王鹏飞, 谭文辉, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 不同粗糙度和隙宽贯通充填裂隙 渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3062-3070.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 刚,李术才,王明斌. 渗透压力作用下加锚裂隙岩体围岩稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843 -2849 .
[2] 刘玉成,曹树刚,刘延保. 可描述地表沉陷动态过程的时间函数模型探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 925 -931 .
[3] 刘恩龙. 岩土破损力学:结构块破损机制与二元介质模型[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 13 -22 .
[4] 介玉新,杨光华. 基于广义位势理论的弹塑性模型的修正方法[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 38 -42 .
[5] 杨建民,郑 刚. 基坑降水中渗流破坏归类及抗突涌验算公式评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[6] 周 华,王国进,傅少君,邹丽春,陈胜宏. 小湾拱坝坝基开挖卸荷松弛效应的有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1175 -1180 .
[7] 叶 飞,朱合华,何 川. 盾构隧道壁后注浆扩散模式及对管片的压力分析[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1307 -1312 .
[8] 陈 林,张永兴,冉可新. 考虑剪应力作用的挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 219 -223 .
[9] 罗 强 ,王忠涛 ,栾茂田 ,杨蕴明 ,陈培震. 非共轴本构模型在地基承载力数值计算中若干影响因素的探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 732 -0737 .
[10] 龚维明,黄 挺,戴国亮. 海上风电机高桩基础关键参数试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .