节理岩体锚杆的综合变形分析

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 1067-1074.

节理岩体锚杆的综合变形分析

张伟¹，刘泉声²

1. 山东电力工程咨询院有限公司，济南 250013；2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室，武汉 430071

收稿日期:2010-10-22 出版日期:2012-04-13 发布日期:2012-04-26
作者简介:张伟，男，1982年生，博士，工程师，主要从事电力工程的勘察和基础稳定性方面的研究工作
基金资助:
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目“煤矿深井巷道围岩稳定性分析与控制理论研究”(No. kzcx2-yw-152)；国家自然科学基金重点项目“西部高地应力结构性流变岩体的破坏机制及锚固可靠性研究”(No. 90510019)。

Synthetical deformation analysis of anchor bolt in jointed rock mass

ZHANG Wei¹，LIU Quan-sheng²

1. Shandong Electric Power Engineering Consulting Institute Corp., Ltd., Jinan 250013, China; 2. State key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China

Received:2010-10-22 Online:2012-04-13 Published:2012-04-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在总结国内外对节理岩体中锚杆加固机制的试验研究和理论探讨基础上，综合考虑锚杆的切向和轴向变形能力，建立节理锚固锚杆在剪切荷载作用下的变形模型，将节理锚固锚杆的变形区划分为弹性变形段和挤压破坏段，引入表征挤压破坏段长度的变量，对锚杆与岩体的相互作用机制进行理论分析，推导了剪切荷载与剪切位移和轴向荷载与轴向位移的关系。通过分析锚杆的屈服破坏形式，得到了确定挤压破坏段长度的方法。最后，通过算例分析了挤压破坏段长度与锚杆直径、岩体强度、锚固角度等参数的关系，得到了以下结论：（1）节理锚固锚杆抗剪作用的实质是锚杆调动岩体的抗压强度抵抗节理切向荷载。在抗压强度较高的硬岩中，挤压破坏段局限于节理面附近，锚杆影响范围小；而在抗压强度较低的软岩中，挤压破坏段较大，而且会产生较大的剪切变形，锚杆影响范围较大。（2）锚杆屈服破坏形式与岩质和锚杆直径有关。硬质岩体发生剪切屈服，而较软岩体中容易发生弯曲屈服；小直径锚杆一般直接剪切屈服，而大直径锚杆可能发生弯曲屈服。锚杆屈服破坏后出现塑性铰，挤压破坏段范围在节理一侧约为直径的1～2倍，继续增加剪切荷载，挤压破坏段长度不再增大。（3）随岩质的不同，锚杆锚固节理的最优锚固角变化较大。岩质较硬时，最优锚固角度较小，反之则较大。

关键词: 节理岩体, 锚杆, 剪切荷载, 挤压破坏段

Abstract: Based on the former experimental and theoretical researches on the reinforcement mechanisms of anchor bolt in jointed rock mass at home and abroad, and comprehensive considering of the tangential and axial deformability of anchor bolt, a deformation model of joint bolts under shear load is proposed. The deformation of joint bolts is divided into two parts: elastic deformation zone and crushing failure zone. A variable is introduced to express the length of crushing failure zone. Mechanism of interaction between bolts and rock mass is analyzed. Relationships between tangential load and tangential displacement, and axial load and axial displacement are deduced respectively. Through the analysis of yield failure model of bolt, a method to calculate the length of the crushing failure zone is proposed. Finally, a calculation example is presented to study the relationship between the length of crushing failure zone and the parameters, such as the bolt diameter, the rock mass strength, anchorage angle and so on. It is concluded that: (1) The shear resisting function of joint bolts is actually that the bolts arouse the compressive strength of rock mass to resist the shear load of the joint plane. In the hard rock with higher compressive strength, the crushing failure zone is limited near the joint plane and the influence area of bolt is small; while in soft rock with lower compressive strength, the length of crushing failure zone and shear deformation and the influence area of bolt is larger. (2) The yield failure mode of anchor bolt is related to rock properties and diameter of the bolt. Shear yield occurs in hard rock and bending yield occurs in soft rock. Bolt with little diameter usually go through shear yield and bolt with large diameter may go through bending yield. After yield failure, the plastic hinge appears. The length of the crushing failure zone on one side of the joint is 1-2 times of the bolt diameter, however, it no longer increases with the increasing of shear load. (3) The optimal anchor supporting angle of joint anchor bolt varies with rock properties. Hard rock has a smaller anchor supporting angle and the soft rock has a larger one.

Key words: jointed rock mass, anchor bolt, shear load, crushing failure zone

中图分类号:

TU 457

张伟，刘泉声. 节理岩体锚杆的综合变形分析[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1067-1074.

ZHANG Wei ，LIU Quan-sheng. Synthetical deformation analysis of anchor bolt in jointed rock mass[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1067-1074.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王培涛, 黄正均, 任奋华, 章亮, 蔡美峰, . 基于3D打印的含复杂节理岩石直剪特性及破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 46-56.
[2]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[3]	冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[4]	言志信, 龙哲, 屈文瑞, 张森, 江平, . 地震作用下含软弱层岩体边坡锚固界面剪切作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2882-2890.
[5]	吴秋红, 赵伏军, 王世鸣, 周志华, 王斌, 李玉, . 动力扰动下全长黏结锚杆的力学响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 942-950.
[6]	柯志强, 王环玲, 徐卫亚, 林志南, 吉华, . 含横向节理的柱状节理岩体力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 660-667.
[7]	孙钱程, 郑民总, 李邵军, 郭浩森, 程远, 裴书锋, 江权, . 柱状节理岩体隧洞松弛深度的变异特性与确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 728-736.
[8]	陈建功, 陈晓东, . 基于小波函数的锚杆拉拔全过程分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4590-4596.
[9]	冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[10]	叶帅华, 赵壮福, 朱彦鹏, . 框架锚杆支护黄土边坡大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4240-4248.
[11]	丁潇, 谷拴成, 何晖, 张玉, . 单/多离层作用下锚杆受力特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4299-4305.
[12]	王小伟, 朱杰兵, 李聪, . pH和O2协同作用下预应力锚杆腐蚀损伤行为试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4306-4312.
[13]	王本鑫, 金爱兵, 赵怡晴, 王贺, 孙浩, 刘佳伟, 魏余栋, . 基于CT扫描的含非贯通节理3D打印试件破裂规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3920-3927.
[14]	胡帅伟, 陈士海, . 爆破振动下围岩支护锚杆动力响应解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 281-287.
[15]	刘钟, 张楚福, 张义, 吕美东, 许国平, 陈天雄, . 囊式扩体锚杆在宁波地区的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 295-301.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed