构造应力场中的软岩客运专线双线隧道稳定性研究

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 1535-1541.

构造应力场中的软岩客运专线双线隧道稳定性研究

何本国¹，张志强¹，何川¹，王俊奇²

1.西南交通大学土木工程学院，成都 610031；2.华北电力大学可再生能源学院，北京 102206

收稿日期:2010-11-15 出版日期:2012-05-10 发布日期:2012-05-14
作者简介:何本国，男，1984年生，博士研究生，主要从事隧道工程和岩土工程方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（No. 51078318）；新世纪优秀人才支持计划（No. NCET-10-0667）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金科技创新项目（No. SWJTU09CX006）；国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）资助项目（No. 2010CB732105）。

Study of stability of two-lane soft rock tunnel for high-speed passenger railway in tectonic geo-stress

HE Ben-guo¹, ZHANG Zhi-qiang¹, HE Chuan¹, WANG Jun-qi²

1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China; 2. School of Renewable Energy Resources, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2010-11-15 Online:2012-05-10 Published:2012-05-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以铁道部250 km/h客运专线标准断面双线隧道为对象，依托木寨岭高地应力软岩隧道工程，研究构造应力场条件下隧道变形特性、能量积聚、力学响应及塑性区规律。水平大主应力平行隧道轴线时，高能集中区和塑性区主要集中于边墙，掌子面前方围岩能量密度较小，掌子面挤出变形较大；水平大主应力垂直轴线时，高能集中区和塑性区主要分布在拱顶、仰拱及掌子面，掌子面前方围岩能量密度较大，挤压变形较小。研究表明：掌子面前方待开挖核心土体表现能量-位移正交性，而目前采用简单的挤出变形来判别掌子面稳定性，其合理性值得进一步商榷；规范给出“最大水平主应力与隧道轴线平行或小角度相交设计原则”，并不是对所有高地应力场都适用；锚杆在开挖初期有效促进临时“承载拱”的形成，使“压力拱”偏移至隧道轮廓附近，成为施工初期稳定的关键；锚杆降低边墙深部岩体切向应力峰值，随着掌子面推进，拱效应不断向深部岩体移动，形成动态压力拱。

关键词: 软岩隧道, 高地应力, 位移-能量正交, 锚杆, 稳定性

Abstract: By taking on standard cross section used for two-lane soft rock tunnel on high-speed passenger railway for 250 km/h, Muzhai Mountain soft rock tunnel is cited here. Meanwhile, energy accumulation, deformation, mechanical response and plastic zone are developed to study stability of tunnel in different characteristics of geostress field. When the horizontal maximum principal stress is parallel to the tunnel axis, high energy and plastic zones occur at wall of tunnel mostly. Energy density ahead of working face is smaller; and squeezing deformation of working face is larger. However, when the horizontal maximum principal stress is perpendicular to the axis, high energy and plastic zones distribute at crown and invert of tunnel, ahead of working face. The energy density is larger and the squeezing deformation is smaller ahead of working face. Consequently, the conclusions can be drawn as follows: there is mechanical behavior of deformation-energy orthogonality ahead of working face. Nowadays, squeezing deformation is adopted to evaluate stability ahead of working face simply, which is worth to further study. It is not suitable that tunnel axis should be parallel to horizontal maximum principal stress regulated by means of the relevant codes in different tectonic geostresses. Bolt has effect on formation of arch effect temporarily at initial stage of excavation. It can make the arch effect closer to tunnel and reduce effectively the peak value of tangential stress for surrounding rock at wall. With advance of working face, arch effect moves to deep rock. Therefore, staged arch effect is formed.

Key words: soft rock tunnel, high geostress, orthogonality of deformation-energy, bolt, stability

中图分类号:

TU 452

何本国，张志强，何川，王俊奇 . 构造应力场中的软岩客运专线双线隧道稳定性研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1535-1541.

HE Ben-guo , ZHANG Zhi-qiang , HE Chuan , WANG Jun-qi . Study of stability of two-lane soft rock tunnel for high-speed passenger railway in tectonic geo-stress[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1535-1541.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[2]	朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[3]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[4]	刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[5]	聂秀鹏, 逄焕平, 孙志彬, 谢松梅, 侯超群. 三维加筋边坡地震稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
[6]	陈卫忠, 田云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[7]	朱才辉, 崔晨, 兰开江, 东永强. 砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物拆除对榆林卫城稳定性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3153-3166.
[8]	陈冲, 王卫, 吕华永, . 基于复合抗滑桩模型加固边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3207-3217.
[9]	陈建功, 李会, 贺自勇, . 基于变分法的均质土坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2931-2937.
[10]	冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[11]	蒋泽锋, 张戈, 朱大勇, 王军, . 锚固力作用下的边坡临界滑动场法研究与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2799-2806.
[12]	王宏磊, 孙志忠, 刘永智, 武贵龙, . 青藏铁路含融化夹层路基热力响应监测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2815-2824.
[13]	言志信, 龙哲, 屈文瑞, 张森, 江平, . 地震作用下含软弱层岩体边坡锚固界面剪切作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2882-2890.
[14]	陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[15]	余国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed