碱渣改良膨胀土室内试验研究

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 1608-1612.

碱渣改良膨胀土室内试验研究

孙树林^{1, 2}，郑青海^{2, 3}，唐俊^{2, 4}，张淦钰^{2, 5}，周立国^{2, 6}，尚文涛⁷

1. 河海大学水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室，南京 210098；2. 河海大学地球科学与工程学院，南京 210098；3. 中国水电顾问集团中南勘测设计研究院，长沙 410014；4. 安徽省交通规划设计研究院，合肥 230088；5. 江苏省国土资源信息中心，南京 210029； 6. 安徽省电力设计院，合肥 230601；7. 河海大学土木工程与交通学院，南京 210098

收稿日期:2010-12-20 出版日期:2012-06-11 发布日期:2012-06-14
作者简介:孙树林，男，1963年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事环境地质工程及岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作
基金资助:
教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金（No. [2007]1108）；河海大学水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室开放研究基金项目(No. 2005408911)；江苏省环保科研基金项目(No. 201029)。

Experimental research on expansive soil improved by soda residue

SUN Shu-lin^{1, 2}，ZHENG Qing-hai^{2, 3}，TANG Jun^{2, 4}，ZHANG Gan-yu^{2, 5}，ZHOU Li-guo^{2, 6}，SHANG Wen-tao⁷

1. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology, Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 2. College of Earth Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 3. Mid-South Design and Research Institute, China Hydropower Engineering Consulting Group Co., Changsha 410014, China; 4. Anhui Communications Consulting & Design Institute, Hefei 230088, China; 5. Information Center of Jiangsu of Land and Resources, Nanjing 210029, China; 6. Anhui Electric Power Design Institute, Hefei 230601, China; 7. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China

Received:2010-12-20 Online:2012-06-11 Published:2012-06-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过室内试验，探讨利用碱渣作为添加剂对膨胀土改良的可行性和改良效果和碱渣改性土的基本物理力学性质和膨胀性。研究结果表明，随着掺渣率的增加，碱渣改性土的黏性成分的含量降低，粗颗粒含量增加，导致相对密度、液限、塑性指数、自由膨胀率、有荷膨胀量均呈明显减小趋势，这说明碱渣对膨胀土膨胀性的改良有显著效果；碱渣改性土可击实含水率范围较之膨胀土宽，这给碱渣改性土的施工带来很大方便；经过7 d养护后的土样无侧限抗压强度和抗剪强度都显著增加，并在掺渣率为30%时存在一个峰值点。抗剪强度增强主要体现在黏聚力显著增加，而内摩擦角变化不大。

关键词: 膨胀土, 碱渣, 改良, 固体废弃物

Abstract: By laboratory test, the potential use and effectiveness of soda residue as an additive for improving expansive soil are evaluated. The tests research the features of the basic physico-mechanical properties and expansibility of soda residues treated soil. The result shows that the increase of blending residue ratio has made the viscous composition decreased while the percentage of coarse granule increases so that the plasticity index, liquid limit, relative density, free swell index, load swell index are reduced significantly with the increase of soda residue. The test indicates that the soda residue has significant impact on the improvement of the expansibility of expansive soil. The range of compaction water content for soda residues treated soil is larger than expansive soil’s. It brings great convenience for the construction of soda residues treated soil roadbed. After 7 days conservation, there is a remarkable increase in unconfined compression strength and shear strength. Furthermore, a peak appears when the blending ratio of residue has come up to 30%. The remarkable increase in cohesion reflects the shear strength enhancement. However, the angle of internal friction changes little.

Key words: expansive soil, soda residue, improvement, solid waste

中图分类号:

TU 443

孙树林，郑青海，唐俊，张淦钰，周立国，尚文涛 . 碱渣改良膨胀土室内试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1608-1612.

SUN Shu-lin ，ZHENG Qing-hai ，TANG Jun ，ZHANG Gan-yu ，ZHOU Li-guo ，SHANG Wen-tao . Experimental research on expansive soil improved by soda residue[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1608-1612.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[2]	刘祖强, 罗红明, 郑敏, 施云江, . 南水北调渠坡膨胀土胀缩特性及变形模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 409-414.
[3]	李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[4]	陈永青, 文畅平, 方炫强, . 生物酶改良膨胀土的修正殷宗泽模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3515-3523.
[5]	李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 南阳原状膨胀土不排水剪切性状时效性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2947-2955.
[6]	李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 考虑卸荷速率的K0固结膨胀土应力-应变行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1299-1306.
[7]	蔡正银, 朱洵, 黄英豪, 张晨. 冻融过程对膨胀土裂隙演化特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4555-4563.
[8]	李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 卸荷损伤原状膨胀土剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4685-4692.
[9]	梁维云, 韦昌富, 颜荣涛, 杨德欢. NaCl溶液饱和膨胀土的压缩特性及其微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4759-4766.
[10]	李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 原状膨胀土剪切力学特性的卸荷速率效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3758-3766.
[11]	郑俊杰, 吕思祺, 曹文昭, 景丹, . 高填方膨胀土作用下刚柔复合桩基挡墙结构数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 395-402.
[12]	李国维, 施赛杰, 侯宇宙, 吴建涛, 李峰, 吴少甫, . 引江济淮试验工程非膨胀土开发技术实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 302-314.
[13]	庄心善, 王俊翔, 王康, 李凯, 胡智. 风化砂改良膨胀土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 149-156.
[14]	胡东旭，李贤，周超云，薛乐，刘洪伏，汪时机. 膨胀土干湿循环胀缩裂隙的定量分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 318-324.
[15]	杨和平，唐咸远，王兴正，肖杰，倪啸，. 有荷干湿循环条件下不同膨胀土抗剪强度基本特性[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2311-2317.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed