富水软岩隧道突泥塌方及地层沉降的模型试验

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 2291-2296.

富水软岩隧道突泥塌方及地层沉降的模型试验

魏星，沈乐，陶志平

西南交通大学土木工程学院岩土工程系，成都 610031

收稿日期:2011-04-07 出版日期:2012-08-10 发布日期:2012-08-13
作者简介:魏星，女，1977年生，博士，副教授，主要从事本构理论和岩土工程数值分析方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家973计划项目(No. 2010CB732103)

Model test studies of collapse and settlement of tunnel in saturated soft rocks

WEI Xing，SHEN Le，TAO Zhi-ping

Department of Geotechnical Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

Received:2011-04-07 Online:2012-08-10 Published:2012-08-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在富水软岩地层中修建隧道容易出现突泥塌方，对施工及周边环境产生严重影响。北岗隧道围岩强度低且地下水丰富，在施工中多次遇到突泥涌水现象，出现了围岩大面积坍塌、地表开裂、地下水位下降等严重灾害问题。以北岗隧道为原型，开展了室内模型试验，再现了该隧道的破坏现象，研究了隧道突泥塌方的影响因素、破坏规律及影响范围。结果表明:（1）地表未出现裂缝时，隧道开挖导致的地表和地层内部变形可以采用Peck的正态分布曲线描述；（2）涌水是造成隧道围岩发生严重坍塌的根本原因；（3）隧道破坏从拱顶开始，呈拱形破坏型式；（4）地表的两条主裂缝在隧道塌方初期形成，塌方对地表沉降和裂缝的主要影响区域位于两条主裂缝之间。

关键词: 模型试验, 软岩隧道, 塌方, 沉降

Abstract: Tunneling in saturated soft rocks may induce serious environment problems. During the excavation of Beigang Tunnel, a railway tunnel in soft rock mass rich in water, a large volume of water and soil flowed into the tunnel and induced severe damage at several sites. At these sites, water table fell down, ground surface cracks occurred. Taking Beigang Tunnel as the prototype, model tests are conducted to study the pattern and law of ground subsidence and cracks when tunneling in soft rock with high water content. It was found that: (1) The transverse settlements curve of ground before collapse can be well described by the normal probability curve proposed by peck. (2) Water and soil flow is the main reason for severe damage in Beigang Tunnel. (3) Collapse happens firstly at the top of the tunnel and then develops upwards to form an arch shaped failure structure. (4) Main influenced area on surface by tunneling is limited in the region between the two largest cracks, which come into being in the early stage of collapse and located on the each side of the tunnel axis respectively.

Key words: model test, tunnel in soft rock, collapse, settlement

中图分类号:

TU 443

魏星，沈乐，陶志平. 富水软岩隧道突泥塌方及地层沉降的模型试验[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2291-2296.

WEI Xing，SHEN Le，TAO Zhi-ping. Model test studies of collapse and settlement of tunnel in saturated soft rocks[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2291-2296.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[2]	王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[3]	陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
[4]	刘成禹, 陈博文, 罗洪林, 阮家椿, . 满流条件下管道破损诱发渗流侵蚀的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 1-10.
[5]	刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[6]	于一帆, 王平, 王会娟, 许书雅, 郭海涛, . 堆积层滑坡地震动力响应的物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[7]	张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[8]	雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[9]	王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[10]	陈宇龙, 内村太郎, . 基于弹性波波速的降雨型滑坡预警系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3373-3386.
[11]	王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[12]	卢谅, 石通辉, 杨东, . 置换减载与加筋复合处理方法对路基不均匀沉降控制效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3474-3482.
[13]	杨文波, 邹涛, 涂玖林, 谷笑旭, 刘雨辰, 晏启祥, 何川. 高速列车振动荷载作用下马蹄形断面隧道动力响应特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3635-3644.
[14]	陈卫忠, 田云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[15]	张治国, 黄茂松, 杨轩, . 基于衬砌长期渗漏水影响的隧道施工扰动诱发超孔隙水压消散及地层固结沉降解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed