湖相软土流变模型识别及其工程应用分析

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 2383-2387.

湖相软土流变模型识别及其工程应用分析

邵勇^{1, 2}，阎长虹¹，许宝田¹，徐杨¹，吴焕然¹

1.南京大学地球科学与工程学院，南京 210093；2. 连云港职业技术学院，江苏连云港 222006

收稿日期:2011-12-20 出版日期:2012-08-10 发布日期:2012-08-13
作者简介:邵勇，男，1982年生，博士研究生，主要从事城市环境岩土工程方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
教育部高等学校科技创新工程重大项目培育资金项目(No. 708043)

Identification on rheological model of lacustrine soft soil and its engineering application

SHAO Yong^{1, 2}，YAN Chang-hong¹，XU Bao-tian¹，XU Yang¹，WU Huan-ran¹

1. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China; 2. Lianyungang Technical College, Lianyungang, Jiangsu 222006, China

Received:2011-12-20 Online:2012-08-10 Published:2012-08-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对苏州湖相软土进行了三轴流变试验，根据试验结果拟采用S-6、K-B、K-S 3个流变模型来描述土体的流变特征，在模型参数反演中发现，S-6模型对加载初期变形的拟合精度不够，K-B模型对加载中期变形的拟合精度不够，而K-S模型能够很好地描述苏州湖相软土的流变特征。在模型的实际应用中引入应力比的概念，发现应力比与模型参数成指数关系，以此可以根据不同的工程应力条件来选择模型参数，最后，将该模型用于实际工程的沉降计算，通过与实测数据的对比显示模型的拟合精度较高，可以用于指导该地区的工程建设。

关键词: 湖相软土, 三轴流变, K-S流变模型, 应力比, 地基沉降

Abstract: The triaxial rheological tests are carried out on Suzhou lacustrine soft soil; according to the results of test, S-6, K-B and K-S rheological models are used to describe the rheological characteristics of the soil. In the inversion of model parameters, it is found that the fitting accuracy of initial deformation by S-6 model is not enough; and the fitting accuracy of medium-term deformation by K-B model is not enough; the fitting results of K-S model are the best. Therefore, K-S model is used to study the rheological properties of Suzhou lacustrine soft soil. In order to determine the parameters of model better, the concept of stress ratio is introduced in the practical application of the model, and it is found that, there are exponential relationship between stress ratio and model parameters; based on this, we can select the model parameters according to different engineering stress conditions. At last, the model is used for the settlement calculation of practical engineering; the results show that K-S model has high fitting precision, and it can be used to guide the region's project construction.

Key words: lacustrine soft soil, triaxial rheology, K-S model, stress ratio, settlement of foundation

中图分类号:

TU 411

邵勇，阎长虹，许宝田，徐杨，吴焕然 . 湖相软土流变模型识别及其工程应用分析[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2383-2387.

SHAO Yong ，YAN Chang-hong ，XU Bao-tian ，XU Yang ，WU Huan-ran . Identification on rheological model of lacustrine soft soil and its engineering application[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2383-2387.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[2]	马维嘉, 陈国兴, 吴琪, . 复杂加载条件下珊瑚砂抗液化强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 535-542.
[3]	刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[4]	张峰, 陈国兴, 吴琪, 周正龙. 波浪荷载下饱和粉土不排水动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2695-2702.
[5]	王铁行, 金鑫, 罗扬, 张松林. 考虑卸荷作用的黄土湿陷性评价方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1281-1290.
[6]	刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 李学彬, 张建俊, 任昆, . 部分排水时饱和粉质黏土变围压循环三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1413-1419.
[7]	盛云锋, 陈远, 周伟, 马刚, 常晓林, . 基于改进动剪切模量模型的堆石坝动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 405-414.
[8]	郑进修，张建海，高克静. 地下厂房支护措施经验回归及支护强度判据[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 303-310.
[9]	陆清元，罗强，蒋良潍, . 路堤下刚性桩复合地基桩-土应力比计算[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2473-2482.
[10]	陈四利，李艳宇，周辉，胡大伟,. 基于极限应力比的三参数双τ2强度准则及其应用[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1948-1954.
[11]	孔洋，阮怀宁，黄雪峰, . 延安地区压实马兰黄土高压固结变形特性[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1731-1736.
[12]	姜文雨, 刘一, . 刚性桩复合地基中性面深度与桩土应力比计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4554-4560.
[13]	姜景山，程展林，左永振，丁红顺,. 三维应力状态下粗粒料强度特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3581-3588.
[14]	周正龙，陈国兴，赵凯，吴琪，马维嘉. 循环加载方向角对饱和粉土不排水动力特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 36-44.
[15]	陈卫忠，马池帅，田洪铭，杨建平,. TBM隧道施工期岩爆预测方法探讨[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 241-249.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed