刚性荷载下现浇X形桩复合地基极限承载力特性研究

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 2691-2696.

刚性荷载下现浇X形桩复合地基极限承载力特性研究

吕亚茹^{1, 2}，丁选明^{1, 3}，孙甲⁴，孔纲强^{1, 2}

1.河海大学岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室，南京 210098；2.河海大学岩土工程科学研究所，南京 210098； 3.河海大学水资源高效利用与工程安全国家工程研究中心，南京210098；4.河南省尙正行房地产咨询有限公司，郑州 450000

收稿日期:2012-05-07 出版日期:2012-09-11 发布日期:2012-09-12
作者简介:吕亚茹，女，1987年生，博士研究生，主要从事软土特性与软基处理方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金高铁联合基金重点项目（No. U1134207）；国家自然科学基金青年项目（No. 51008115，No. 51008116）

Analysis of ultimate bearing capacity of X-section cast-in-place concrete pile composite foundation under rigid load

LÜ Ya-ru^{1, 2}, DING Xuan-ming^{1, 3}, SUN Jia⁴, KONG Gang-qiang^{1, 2}

1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 2. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 3. National Engineering Research Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Engineering Safety, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 4. Henan SZH Real Estate Organization Company, Zhengzhou 450000, China

Received:2012-05-07 Online:2012-09-11 Published:2012-09-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 现浇X形桩是通过等截面周边扩大原理，将圆形截面的正拱变为反拱而成的。作为一种新型的异型截面桩，目前对其极限承载力的计算仍采用规范中建议的经验公式。结合南京桥北污水处理厂地基处理工程的现场静载荷试验，应用有限元软件ABAQUS，建立刚性荷载下现浇X形混凝土桩复合地基的模型，模拟不同桩身模量、桩周土模量、桩长、褥垫层厚度和模量等参数下现浇X形混凝土桩复合地基的荷载-沉降关系，从而得出复合地基的极限承载力。结果表明，现浇X形桩单桩复合地基极限承载力比等截面面积的圆形桩单桩复合地基增大20%以上，X形桩4桩梅花形复合地基极限承载力比等截面面积的圆形桩大12.35%。极限承载力随桩身模量、褥垫层模量、桩周土体模量或者桩长的增大而增大，而且在众多影响因素中桩周土体模量对复合地基极限承载力的影响最为明显。

关键词: 现浇X形桩, 现场试验, 极限承载力, 桩侧摩阻力

Abstract: Based on the principle of enlarging perimeter with the same section area, X-section cast-in-place concrete pile (abridged XCC pile) is developed by changing the convex of circular-section to concave. As a new special section pile, the ultimate bearing capacity is calculated by empirical formulas in standard. The in-situ static load tests are carried out based on the foundation treatment project in Qiaobei sewage treatment plant in Nanjing. Besides, a finite element model is established to simulate the XCC pile composite foundation under the rigid base by software ABAQUS. The ultimate bearing capacities are discussed considering some factors including elastic modulus of pile, modulus of surrounding soil, pile length, cushion thickness and cushion modulus. The results indicate that XCC single-pile composite foundation can increase the bearing capacity by 20% more than that of traditional pile. The ultimate bearing capacity of XCC four-pile composite foundation can increase the bearing capacity by 12.35% more than that of traditional pile. The ultimate bearing capacity increases with the increase of pile modulus, cushion modulus surrounding soil modulus and pile length. From the factors, the effect of modulus of surrounding soil is most obviously.

Key words: X-section cast-in-place concrete (XCC) pile, in-situ test, ultimate bearing capacity, pile side friction

中图分类号:

TU 473

吕亚茹，丁选明，孙甲，孔纲强 . 刚性荷载下现浇X形桩复合地基极限承载力特性研究[J]. , 2012, 33(9): 2691-2696.

Lü Ya-ru , DING Xuan-ming , SUN Jia , KONG Gang-qiang . Analysis of ultimate bearing capacity of X-section cast-in-place concrete pile composite foundation under rigid load[J]. , 2012, 33(9): 2691-2696.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
[2]	蔡雨, 徐林荣, 周德泉, 邓超, 冯晨曦, . 自平衡与传统静载试桩法模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3011-3018.
[3]	冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[4]	穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘旸, 刘泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[5]	吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 龚辉, 周昌, 徐楚, 王强, 应春业, . 3种模式下钻孔灌注桩桩-土剪切特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2838-2846.
[6]	余瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[7]	王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[8]	信亚雯, 周志芳, 马筠, 李鸣威, 陈朦, 汪姗, 胡尊乐, . 基于现场双管试验确定弱透水层水力参数的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1535-1542.
[9]	李驰, 王硕, 王燕星, 高瑜, 斯日古楞, . 沙漠微生物矿化覆膜及其稳定性的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1291-1298.
[10]	任连伟, 孔纲强, 郝耀虎, 刘汉龙, . 基于能量桩现场试验的土体综合热导率系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4857-4864.
[11]	王冬勇, 陈曦, 于玉贞, 吕彦楠, . 基于二阶锥规划有限元增量加载法的条形浅基础极限承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4890-4896.
[12]	冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[13]	崔光耀, 祁家所, 王明胜, . 片理化玄武岩隧道围岩大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 231-237.
[14]	王炳龙，梅祯，肖军华. 土工格室补强路基整治路基病害的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 325-332.
[15]	宗钟凌，鲁先龙，李青松，. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed