卡拉水电站坝区渗流控制效应精细模拟与评价

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 2743-2748.

卡拉水电站坝区渗流控制效应精细模拟与评价

郑华康^{1, 2}，张枫^{1, 2}，李毅^{1, 2}，陈益峰^{1, 2}，周创兵^{1, 2}

1.武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室，武汉 430072；2.武汉大学水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室，武汉 430072

收稿日期:2012-02-29 出版日期:2012-09-11 发布日期:2012-09-12
通讯作者: 陈益峰，男，1974年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事岩土多场耦合分析，岩土渗流、变形与稳定分析方面的研究工作。E-mail: csyfchen@whu.edu.cn E-mail:zhengzeci@whu.edu.cn
作者简介:郑华康，男，1990年生，博士研究生，主要从事岩土体变形与稳定性研究工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No. 51079107，No. 51179136）；教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目（No. NCET-09-0610）

Simulation and assessment of seepage control effects at dam site in Kala hydropower project

ZHENG Hua-kang^{1, 2}, ZHANG Feng^{1, 2}, LI Yi^{1, 2}, CHEN Yi-feng^{1, 2}, ZHOU Chuang-bing^{1, 2}

1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

Received:2012-02-29 Online:2012-09-11 Published:2012-09-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 卡拉水电站坝址区河谷狭窄，岸坡陡峻，地质条件复杂，渗漏问题突出。为减小卡拉坝区渗漏并改善大坝的渗透稳定性，工程设计采取防渗帷幕、排水孔幕和排水洞等防渗排水措施。采用子结构、变分不等式和自适应罚函数相结合的方法（简称SVA方法），结合典型溢流坝段与坝区整体渗流场分析成果，评价卡拉大坝及坝基渗流控制方案的合理性，并论证其优化的可能性。研究表明：①防渗帷幕有效雍高了帷幕上游侧岩体内的地下水位、增加了绕坝渗流的渗径长度并降低了坝基的扬压力，排水系统则显著降低了坝体内的孔隙水压力以及坝基扬压力；②排水孔幕间距对坝体内的自由面分布有着显著影响，排水孔幕间距取3.0～4.5 m是合适的。

关键词: 卡拉水电站, 渗流控制, SVA方法, 数值模拟

Abstract: The Kala Hydropower Project, located in a narrow and deeply-cut valley on the middle course of the Yalong River, is subjected to serious seepage and leakage problems due to complex geological conditions at the dam site. In order to reduce the quantity of seepage flow through and around the gravity dam and prevent the dam and its foundation from seepage failure, a seepage control system consisting of grouting curtain, drainage hole array and drainage tunnels is designed. For performance assessment and optimization design of the seepage control system, a numerical method combining a substructure technique, a variational inequality formulation of Signorini’s type and an adaptive penalized Heaviside function (short for SVA method) is adopted. Numerical results at a typical overflow dam section and the whole dam site demonstrate that the primary design is a proper and considerable scheme for seepage control but further optimization can be performed in designing the layout. The results show that: ① the grouting curtain can effectively raise the groundwater level at the upstream of the grouting curtain, increase the bypass seepage path and reduce the uplift pressure in the dam foundation, and the drainage system can significantly reduce the pore water pressure in the dam body and the uplift pressure in the dam foundation; ② the drainage hole spacing has significant effects on the free surface locations with an appropriate spacing of 3.0~4.5 m.

Key words: Kala hydropower project, seepage control, SVA method, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TV 223

郑华康，张枫，李毅，陈益峰，周创兵 . 卡拉水电站坝区渗流控制效应精细模拟与评价[J]. , 2012, 33(9): 2743-2748.

ZHENG Hua-kang , ZHANG Feng , LI Yi , CHEN Yi-feng , ZHOU Chuang-bing . Simulation and assessment of seepage control effects at dam site in Kala hydropower project[J]. , 2012, 33(9): 2743-2748.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[2]	夏坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[3]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[4]	闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[5]	刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[6]	金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[7]	韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[8]	吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[9]	吴凤元, 樊赟赟, 陈剑平, 李军, . 基于不同侵蚀模型的高速崩滑碎屑流动力过程模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3236-3246.
[10]	孙峰, 薛世峰, 逄铭玉, 唐梅荣, 张翔, 李川, . 基于连续损伤的水平井射孔-近井筒三维破裂模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3255-3261.
[11]	穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘旸, 刘泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[12]	金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[13]	张聪, 梁经纬, 阳军生, 曹磊, 谢亦朋, 张贵金, . 堤坝脉动注浆浆液扩散机制及应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1507-1514.
[14]	严健, 何川, 汪波, 蒙伟, . 高地温对隧道岩爆发生的影响性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.
[15]	李世俊, 马昌慧, 刘应明, 韩玉珍, 张彬, 张嘎, . 离心模型试验与数值模拟相结合研究采空边坡渐进破坏特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1577-1583.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed