›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 2829-2836.

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

排水砂槽渗流试验与Signorini型变分不等式方法验证

白正雄,陈益峰,胡 冉,张 勤,周创兵   

  1. 武汉大学 水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-07 出版日期:2012-09-11 发布日期:2012-09-12
  • 作者简介:白正雄,男,1986年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土力学数值模拟方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(No. 2011CB013500);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51079107,No. 51179136);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(No. NCET-09-0610)。

Seepage flow test on drain sand flume and validation of variational inequality method of Signorini condition

BAI Zheng-xiong, CHEN Yi-feng, HU Ran, ZHANG Qin, ZHOU Chuang-bing   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Received:2012-05-07 Online:2012-09-11 Published:2012-09-12

摘要: 排水是岩土体及工程构筑物渗流控制的主要措施之一,其实质是通过在渗流域内形成潜在溢出边界或低水位边界而实现渗流控制的。在排水渗控条件下,渗流场往往具有强烈的边界非线性特征,Signorini型变分不等式方法从理论上为稳定和非稳定排水渗流问题提供了有效的分析方法,但其实际效果还需要得到试验的验证。通过开展含5个排水廊道的排水砂槽模型试验,研究了复杂排水条件下砂土渗流的基本规律,并通过试验数据与数值计算成果的对比分析,论证了Signorini型变分不等式方法的有效性和正确性。试验结果表明,在稳定渗流条件下,排水砂槽上游侧3个排水廊道对渗流控制起主导作用,而下游侧2个廊道则失去排水功能,数值计算与试验成果吻合较好;在非稳定渗流条件下,受测压管精度、砂样均匀性和毛细效应的影响,数值计算与试验成果存在一定偏差,但也较好地揭示了复杂排水条件下砂槽中的非稳定渗流特征。排水砂槽试验结果验证了Signorini型变分不等式方法的有效性和正确性,为复杂排水条件下岩土体及工程构筑物的渗控结构优化设计提供了有效的分析手段。

关键词: 砂槽模型, 排水试验, 非稳定渗流, Signorini型变分不等式

Abstract: Draining is one of most effective seepage control measures for geomaterials and engineering structures, of which the essence is through forming the potential spillover boundary or low water level boundary in flow region to realize the seepage control. Induced by the seepage boundary of drains, the seepage flow may exhibit a strong nonlinear effect. The variational inequality formulation of Signorini condition has been theoretically proved to be an effective approach for steady and non-steady seepage problems with drains, but needs further experimental validations. For this purpose, a laboratory test is performed on the seepage behavior in a sand flume with five horizontal drainage galleries, then the effectiveness and correctness of the variational inequality method of Signorini condition is validated by experimental data. The experimental results show that: in steady seepage flow condition, the upstream three drainage galleries in the sand flume have a dominant effect on controlling the seepage flow, while the other two drainage galleries in the downstream side lose the draining effect; and the numerical results agree well with experimental observations. In non-steady seepage flow condition, the numerical results somewhat deviate from the experimental results due to low accuracy of piezometer tubes, inhomogeneity of the sand sample and negligence of capillary effect. The non-steady seepage flow process in the sand flume with complex drains, however, is still satisfactorily demonstrated. The effectiveness and correctness of the variational inequality method of Signorini condition is validated by the seepage flow test; and it provides an effective approach for optimization design of seepage control structure in geotechnical engineering under complex drains.

Key words: sand flume model, drainage test, non-steady seepage, variational inequality of Signorini condition

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 李修磊, 李金凤, 施建勇, . 考虑纤维加筋作用的城市生活 垃圾土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1916-1924.
[2] 周 斌,严 俊,刘斯宏,杨茂盛,. 结点虚流量法理论基础阐释及改进算法[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 349-355.
[3] 薛海斌,党发宁,尹小涛,丁卫华,刘海伟,. 非稳定渗流条件下非饱和土质边坡稳定性的矢量和分析法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 49-56.
[4] 吴 越,杨仲轩,徐长节,. 初始组构各向异性对砂土力学特性及临界状态的影响[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2569-2576.
[5] 贺 洁 ,蒋明镜 , . 孔隙填充型能源土的宏微观力学特性真三轴试验离散元分析[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 3026-3034.
[6] 蒋泽锋 ,朱大勇 ,沈银斌 ,王宝存,. 非饱和-非稳定渗流条件下的边坡临界滑动场[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1815-1823.
[7] 刘映晶 ,李 罡 ,尹振宇 ,夏小和 ,王建华,. 颗粒级配对粒状材料不排水力学特性的影响[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 423-429.
[8] 王 霜 ,陈建生 ,周 鹏,. 三层堤基中细砂层厚度对管涌影响的试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2847-2854.
[9] 杨期君 ,赵春风 , . 水合物沉积物力学性质的三维离散元分析[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 255-262.
[10] 叶祖洋 ,姜清辉 ,姚 池 ,周创兵 . 岩体裂隙网络非稳定渗流分析与数值模拟[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 1171-1178.
[11] 詹美礼,踪金梁,严 飞,罗玉龙,盛金昌. 堤外水位升降条件下非稳定渗流模型试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 91-96.
[12] 宋新江,徐海波. 平面应变条件下水泥土强度特性试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2325-2330.
[13] 高洪梅,刘汉龙,刘金元,沈 扬. EPS颗粒轻质混合土的蠕变模型研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 198-205.
[14] 王学武,许尚杰,党发宁,程素珍. 水位骤降时的非饱和坝坡稳定分析[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2760-2764.
[15] 年廷凯,万少石,蒋景彩,栾茂田. 库水位下降过程中土坡稳定强度折减有限元分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2264-2269.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 崔 凯,谌文武,张景科,韩文峰,梁收运. 多元层状边坡土体风蚀速率与微结构参数关系[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2741 -2746 .
[2] 李加贵,陈正汉,黄雪峰,李 佳. 原状非饱和Q3黄土的土压力原位测试和强度特性研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 433 -440 .
[3] 胡明鉴,汪 稔,陈中学,王志兵. 泥石流启动过程PFC数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 394 -397 .
[4] 张建新,刘双菊,周嘉宾. 逆作基坑开挖卸荷对工程结构的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 218 -223 .
[5] 白 冰,李春峰. 地铁列车振动作用下近距离平行隧道的弹塑性动力响应[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 123 -128 .
[6] 任 重,盛 谦. 我国岩石力学学科结构及其演变初探[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 293 -298 .
[7] 张军辉. 不同软基处理方式下高速公路加宽工程变形特性分析[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1216 -1222 .
[8] 王亮清,P.H.S.W. Kulatilake,唐辉明,梁 烨,吴 琼. 双临空面岩质边坡滑动与倾倒破坏的运动学分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 72 -77 .
[9] 李 旭,张利民,敖国栋. 失水过程孔隙结构、孔隙比、含水率变化规律[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 100 -105 .
[10] 邓华锋,李建林,刘 杰,朱 敏,郭 靖,鲁 涛. 考虑裂隙水压力的岩体压剪裂纹扩展规律研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 297 -0302 .