夯实水泥土桩桩身压缩量对承载特性的影响

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (S1): 233-236.

夯实水泥土桩桩身压缩量对承载特性的影响

杨志红¹，郭忠贤²

1. 河北省建筑科学研究院，石家庄 050021；2. 石家庄铁道大学土木分院，石家庄 050043

收稿日期:2012-05-11 出版日期:2012-09-11 发布日期:2012-09-21
作者简介:杨志红，女，1964年生，正高级工程师，从事岩土工程设计、施工、测试及研究

Influence of pile shaft compression on bearing properties of rammed soil-cement pile

YANG Zhi-hong¹, GUO Zhong-xian²

1. Hebei Provincial Architectural Science Institute, Shijiazhuang 050021, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China

Received:2012-05-11 Online:2012-09-11 Published:2012-09-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对夯实水泥土桩的施工方法，在桩身埋设特制的应变传感器，测定桩身应变。基于试验测试数据，探讨桩身压缩量的计算方法，分析桩身压缩变形的分布规律及其对桩侧摩阻力的影响，并探讨不同桩长、不同水泥掺入比情况下，夯实水泥土桩桩身压缩量及其对承载特性的影响。研究表明，（1）对夯实水泥土桩，桩身压缩主要集中在桩身上部8 d（d为桩径）范围内，且变形速率变化较大，桩身压缩在桩顶位移中占比达80%以上；（2）桩身轴向荷载传递、桩侧摩阻力分布主要发生在此范围内；（3）桩身侧摩阻力分布非常不均匀，上部发挥较为充分，而下部发挥较少；（4）在工程常用水泥掺入比下，桩长大于12 d后，桩长径比和水泥掺入比的变化对桩承载特性影响不显著。

关键词: 夯实水泥土桩, 桩身压缩量, 长径比, 掺入比, 承载特性

Abstract: Aiming at special method of installation of rammed soil-cement piles, laying special strain sensor and then the pile shaft can be measured. Based on test data of pile shaft compressions, the computation method of shaft compression is studied; and the distribution of pile shaft compression, and its influence on shaft resistance are analyzed. The shaft compression and its influence on bearing properties in different lengths and different cement contents of rammed soil-cement pile are discussed. Research results show that (1) the pile shaft compression is mainly distributed in upper range of pile length about 8 pile diameters; and the varying gradient is larger; and pile shaft compression the displacement of pile tip; (2) the axial load transfer, distribution of shaft resistance occurred mainly within this range; (3) the shaft friction distribution is uneven; and it plays more fully in upper part of pile and less in lower part of pile; (4) under cement mixing ratio within the common project and the length-diameter ratio＞12, the change of length-diameter ratio and cement mixing ratio is not significant effect on load-bearing characteristics of pile.

Key words: rammed soil-cement piles, shaft compression, length-diameter ratio, cement mixing ratio, bearing properties

中图分类号:

TU473

杨志红，郭忠贤 . 夯实水泥土桩桩身压缩量对承载特性的影响[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 233-236.

YANG Zhi-hong , GUO Zhong-xian . Influence of pile shaft compression on bearing properties of rammed soil-cement pile[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 233-236.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	覃玉兰, 邹新军, 曹雄. 均质砂土中水平简谐荷载与扭矩联合受荷单桩内力、位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[2]	江强强, 焦玉勇, 骆进, 王浩, . 能源桩传热与承载特性研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3351-3362.
[3]	王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[4]	雷华阳, 刘广学, 周骏, . 吹填场区双层软黏土地基承载特性及破坏模式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 260-268.
[5]	王忠瑾, 方鹏飞, 谢新宇, 王奎华, 王文军, 李金柱, . 带肋竹节桩竖向抗压承载力影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 381-388.
[6]	王家全，张亮亮，刘政权，周圆兀. 土工格栅加筋砂土地基大模型动载试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3539-3547.
[7]	肖忠，王琰，王元战，刘莺, . 桶间距对四桶吸力式基础各单向承载力的影响及最优间距的确定[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3603-3611.
[8]	邓琴，汤华，吴振君，尹小涛，袁从华,. 隧道锚–围岩系统承载特性的室内模型试验及畸变纠正[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 247-254.
[9]	徐江，龚维明，张琦，戴国亮，霍少磊，杨超, . 大口径钢管斜桩竖向承载特性数值模拟与现场试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2434-2440.
[10]	李永辉，朱翔，周同和,. 桩端后注浆对大直径灌注桩影响的现场对比试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 388-396.
[11]	崔强，周亚辉，童瑞铭，吉晔. 上拔扩底基础与地基土体承载特性差异性分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 476-482.
[12]	卢一为，丁选明，刘汉龙，孔纲强, . 循环加载下X形桩竖向承载特性模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 281-288.
[13]	曹卫平，陆清元，樊文甫，李升. 竖向荷载作用下斜桩荷载传递性状试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3048-3056.
[14]	刘润，刘孟孟，马文冠,. 新型防沉板基础的地基承载力研究[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3065-3071.
[15]	姚建平，蔡德钩，朱健，王立伟,. 后压浆钻孔灌注桩承载特性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 513-517.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed