›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 3489-3496.

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

锚杆长度和间距对洞室抗爆性能影响研究

徐景茂1, 2,顾金才2,陈安敏2,张向阳2,明治清2   

  1. 1. 中国科学技术大学 近代力学系,合肥 230027;2. 总参工程兵科研三所,河南 洛阳 471023
  • 收稿日期:2012-03-18 出版日期:2012-11-12 发布日期:2012-11-14
  • 作者简介:徐景茂,男,1978年生,学士,助理研究员,主要从事防护工程与岩土工程方面的试验与理论分析工作

Study of anti-explosion ability of reinforced tunnels with different anchor lengths and spacings

XU Jing-mao1, 2,GU Jin-cai2,CHEN An-min2,ZHANG Xiang-yang2,MING Zhi-qing2   

  1. 1. Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China; 2. The Third Research Institute of the Corps of Engineering, General Staff of PLA, Luoyang, Henan 471023, China
  • Received:2012-03-18 Online:2012-11-12 Published:2012-11-14

摘要: 根据Froude相似理论,通过模型试验,对普通锚杆、中密锚杆、长密锚杆、短密锚杆、长短相间密锚杆加固洞室的抗爆性能进行了研究,分析了不同长度、间距的全长粘结式锚杆加固洞室在围岩应力、洞壁加速度、洞室拱顶底板相对位移、洞壁环向应变、洞室破坏形态等方面的不同特点。采用FLAC3D对模型试验进行了模拟,并利用参数化建模方法分析了洞顶位移随锚杆长度、间距的变化规律。研究结果表明:减小锚杆间距比增加锚杆长度更能有效地提高洞室抗爆能力,且锚杆间距必须达到一定密度时才可以阻止围岩裂缝进入锚固区;在锚杆长度相同的情况下,密锚杆能明显减小洞室拱顶加速度峰值、拱顶底板相对位移峰值、残余值和拱脚部位压应变峰值、残余值;当锚杆长度增加到一定程度后,加固的效果并不明显,而且带来了底板加速度峰值、拱顶拉应变峰值的增加;锚杆的最佳长度可取为1/3洞室跨度,锚杆的最佳间距可取为1/15洞室跨度。

关键词: 相似理论, 模型试验, 抗爆性能, 破坏形态, 数值模拟

Abstract: On the basis of Froude similarity law, model test studies of the anti-explosion ability of tunnels which are reinforced by common anchor bolts, slightly dense anchor bolts, long-dense anchor bolts, short-dense anchor bolts, and long-short alternation anchor bolts are carried out. This article, from five aspects, including stress in surrounding rock, acceleration of tunnel wall, relative displacement between vault and footwall, tangential strain of tunnel wall, and failure mode of tunnels, analyzes the different characteristics of tunnels reinforced by fully grouted anchor bolts which have different lengths and spacings. Furthermore, by using FLAC3D program and parameterized modeling methods, numerical calculations and corresponding model tests are also carried out; and the variation regularity of vault displacement with the change of anchor length and spacing is analyzed. The results show that, as comparing with increasing anchor length, the reinforcement effect of decreasing anchor spacing is better. It just prevents cracks from extending into the reinforced region only when anchor spacing decreases to a certain density. Under the same anchor length, acceleration peak at tunnel vault, peak and residual values of relative displacement between vault and footwall, and peak and residual values of compressive strain at arch springing in the tunnels reinforced by dense anchor bolts reduce greatly. But the reinforcement effect is not evident when the length of dense anchor bolts increases to a certain length; it contrarily arouses the sharp increment of the peak of acceleration at footwall and the peak of tensile strain at vault. The optimum anchor length is one-third of the tunnel span and the optimum anchor spacing is one-fifteenth of the tunnel span.

Key words: similarity theory, model test, anti-explosion ability, failure mode, numerical simulation similarity theory, model test, anti-explosion ability, failure mode, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • O 383
[1] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[2] 陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性 足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
[3] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[4] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[5] 雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[6] 于一帆, 王平, 王会娟, 许书雅, 郭海涛, . 堆积层滑坡地震动力响应的物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[7] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[8] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[9] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[10] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[11] 韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[12] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[13] 王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[14] 陈宇龙, 内村太郎, . 基于弹性波波速的降雨型滑坡预警系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3373-3386.
[15] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[3] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[4] 高广运,赵元一,高 盟,杨成斌. 分层土中群桩水平动力阻抗的改进计算[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 509 -515 .
[5] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[6] 胡勇刚,罗 强,张 良,黄 晶,陈亚美. 基于离心模型试验的水泥土搅拌法加固斜坡软弱土地基变形特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2207 -2213 .
[7] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[8] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[9] 王维铭,孙 锐,曹振中,袁晓铭. 国内外地震液化场地特征对比研究[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3913 -3918 .
[10] 杨召亮,孙冠华,郑 宏. 基于潘氏极大值原理的边坡稳定性的整体分析法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 559 -563 .