现浇X形混凝土桩沉桩挤土效应现场试验研究

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (S2): 219-223.

现浇X形混凝土桩沉桩挤土效应现场试验研究

刘汉龙^{1, 2}，金辉^{1, 2}，丁选明^{1, 2}，李健³

1. 河南大学岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室，南京 210098；2. 河海大学岩土工程科学研究所，南京 210098； 3. 江苏省交通规划设计院，南京 210000

收稿日期:2011-10-13 出版日期:2012-11-22 发布日期:2012-12-11
作者简介:刘汉龙，男，1964年生，博士，教授，长江学者，博士生导师，主要从事地基基础与土动力学方面的教学与研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金高铁联合基金资助（No. U1134207）；国家自然科学基金资助（No. 51008116）；教育部博士点基金资助（No. 20100094110015）；江苏省交通科学研究计划项目资助（No. 2011526412）

Field test research on squeezing effects of X-section cast-in-place concrete pile

LIU Han-long^{1, 2}, JIN Hui^{1, 2}, DING Xuan-ming^{1, 2}, LI Jian³

1. Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering of Ministry of Education, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 2. Geotechnical Research Institute，Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 3. Jiangsu Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institute Co.,Ltd.,Nanjing 210000, China

Received:2011-10-13 Online:2012-11-22 Published:2012-12-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 挤土型桩的挤土效应一直是工程界研究和关注的热点问题之一。结合南京长江四桥北接线段现浇X形桩软基处理工程，首次开展现浇X形混凝土桩（简称X形桩）沉桩过程现场试验，测得不同X形横截面方向、不同距离及深度处的水平位移、侧向土压力以及孔隙水压力的分布规律，研究X形桩挤土效应规律。研究结果表明，最大水平位移发生在桩顶，距离5倍等效桩径处的土体水平位移可以忽略不计；随着桩中心距的增加，挤土压力和孔隙水压力逐渐减小，并且尖角方向的挤土压力大于凹弧方向的挤土压力。现场试验数据为X形桩的布置形式以及桩间距的选择提供有力的设计参考依据。

关键词: 现浇X形混凝土桩, 挤土效应, 侧向位移, 软土地基, 现场试验

Abstract: Squeezing effects of different piles are hot issues and important problems in engineering design and constructions. Based on the Fourth Yangtze River Bridge?s north-line soft soil treatment engineering at Nanjing, the squeezing effects of X-section cast-in-place concrete pile (referred to as XCC pile) were studied. The influence of pile construction on pore water pressure changes, earth pressure and lateral displacement are observed by pre-laying piezometers, earth pressure cells and inclinometers, respectively. Instruments are embedded at different directions and different depths. Through analyzing the data from field tests, the squeezing effects of XCC pile are obtained. The results show that the maximum horizontal displacement occurs at the top of the piles; and these displacements can be neglected when the distance exceeds five times of equivalent pile diameter. It is also shown that crowded soil pressure and pore-water pressure decreased with the increasing of center distance; besides, pressure of sharp corner is larger than that of concavity. The data from field tests provide other engineers with reliable evidences.

Key words: X-section cast-in-place concrete pile, squeezing effects, lateral displacement, soft soil ground, field test

中图分类号:

TU 443

刘汉龙，金辉，丁选明，李健 . 现浇X形混凝土桩沉桩挤土效应现场试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 219-223.

LIU Han-long , JIN Hui , DING Xuan-ming , LI Jian . Field test research on squeezing effects of X-section cast-in-place concrete pile[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 219-223.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
[2]	冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[3]	吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 龚辉, 周昌, 徐楚, 王强, 应春业, . 3种模式下钻孔灌注桩桩-土剪切特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2838-2846.
[4]	余瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[5]	王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[6]	信亚雯, 周志芳, 马筠, 李鸣威, 陈朦, 汪姗, 胡尊乐, . 基于现场双管试验确定弱透水层水力参数的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1535-1542.
[7]	李驰, 王硕, 王燕星, 高瑜, 斯日古楞, . 沙漠微生物矿化覆膜及其稳定性的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1291-1298.
[8]	任连伟, 孔纲强, 郝耀虎, 刘汉龙, . 基于能量桩现场试验的土体综合热导率系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4857-4864.
[9]	崔光耀, 祁家所, 王明胜, . 片理化玄武岩隧道围岩大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 231-237.
[10]	吴建涛, 叶霄, 李国维, 蒋超, 曹雪山, . 高路堤下PHC桩加固软土地基的承载及变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 351-358.
[11]	汪益敏，闫岑，于恒，李奇. 静载作用下土工格栅加筋拓宽路堤土中应力特征试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 311-317.
[12]	王炳龙，梅祯，肖军华. 土工格室补强路基整治路基病害的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 325-332.
[13]	宗钟凌，鲁先龙，李青松，. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[14]	刘成禹，郑智享，. 改进的基于p-y曲线的基坑围护结构计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 446-452.
[15]	郭飞，陶连金，孔恒，马红红，张丽丽，张新全,. 兰州砂卵石地层盾构施工振动传播及衰减特性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3377-3384.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed