基于流固耦合理论某尾矿坝失稳特性及稳定性分析

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (S2): 243-250.

基于流固耦合理论某尾矿坝失稳特性及稳定性分析

李强^{1, 2}，张力霆^{1, 2}，齐清兰^{1, 2}，周占磊^{1, 2}

1. 石家庄铁道大学土木工程学院，石家庄 050043; 2. 石家庄铁道大学道路与铁道工程安全保障省部共建教育部重点实验室, 石家庄 050043

收稿日期:2011-11-21 出版日期:2012-11-22 发布日期:2012-12-11
作者简介:李强，男，1979年生，博士，副教授，主要从事岩土力学研究方面的工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目资助（No. 50908153）

Instability characteristics and stability analysis of a tailings dam based on fluid-solid coupling theory

LI Qiang^{1, 2}, ZHANG Li-ting^{1, 2}, QI Qing-lan^{1, 2}, ZHOU Zhan-lei^{1, 2}

1.School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Roads and Railway Engineering Safety Control of Ministry of Education, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China

Received:2011-11-21 Online:2012-11-22 Published:2012-12-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选用典型的尾矿库工程实例，采用流固耦合和强度折减法相结合对其尾矿坝进行稳定性分析，确定尾矿库渗流场分布及浸润线的位置，该浸润线位置与实测浸润线位置吻合较好。建议强度折减过程中尾矿坝的失稳准则，计算安全系数，确定潜在滑裂面的位置，并与极限平衡法计算出的安全系数及临界滑裂面位置进行比较，表明强度折减法得出的结果与Bishop法结果接近，流固耦合-强度折减法在尾矿库稳定性分析的可行性。在该基础上研究尾矿坝潜在的失稳模式，将尾矿坝潜在的失稳模式分为局部失稳和整体性失稳两种，局部失稳为尾矿坝的部分坝面发生滑移，整体失稳为整个尾矿坝坝体发生失稳，并分析导致该尾矿坝两种失稳模式的主要因素，认为浸润线埋深过浅是导致局部失稳的主要原因。

关键词: 流固耦合, 强度折减法, 尾矿坝, 安全系数, 稳定性

Abstract: The stability analysis for a typical tailings dam is carried out by combining the fluid-solid coupling method with the strength reduction method. Then the seepage field, the location of potential sliding surface and the safety factor are determined; and the tailings dam failure criterion in strength reduction method for tailings dam is suggested. By comparison, the location of the saturation line by the above determined seepage field is in accordance with the field measured saturation line; meanwhile, the location of the potential sliding surface and the safety factor is well consistent with the results by Bishop method, so as to show the feasibility of the stability analysis for the tailings dam by combining the fluid-solid coupling method with the strength reduction method. Based on the above results, the instability model of the tailings dam is studied; and two instability models are concluded, one is the local instability which the instability takes place in the part of the tailings dam sliding; and the other is global instability which can cause the whole tailings dam failure. Moreover the main factors which lead to the two failure models are analyzed; and the result shows the important factor of the local instability is caused by the too shallow saturation line in the tailing dams.

Key words: fluid-solid coupling theory, strength reduction method, tailings dam, safety factor, stability analysis

中图分类号:

TV 3

李强，张力霆，齐清兰，周占磊 . 基于流固耦合理论某尾矿坝失稳特性及稳定性分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 243-250.

LI Qiang , ZHANG Li-ting , QI Qing-lan , ZHOU Zhan-lei . Instability characteristics and stability analysis of a tailings dam based on fluid-solid coupling theory[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 243-250.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[2]	朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[3]	李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[4]	刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[5]	聂秀鹏, 逄焕平, 孙志彬, 谢松梅, 侯超群. 三维加筋边坡地震稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
[6]	朱才辉, 崔晨, 兰开江, 东永强. 砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物拆除对榆林卫城稳定性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3153-3166.
[7]	陈冲, 王卫, 吕华永, . 基于复合抗滑桩模型加固边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3207-3217.
[8]	陈建功, 李会, 贺自勇, . 基于变分法的均质土坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2931-2937.
[9]	张海娜, 陈从新, 郑允, 孙朝燚, 张亚鹏, 刘秀敏, . 坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[10]	蒋泽锋, 张戈, 朱大勇, 王军, . 锚固力作用下的边坡临界滑动场法研究与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2799-2806.
[11]	王宏磊, 孙志忠, 刘永智, 武贵龙, . 青藏铁路含融化夹层路基热力响应监测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2815-2824.
[12]	陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[13]	吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[14]	王胤, 周令新, 杨庆. 基于不规则钙质砂颗粒发展的拖曳力系数模型及其在细观流固耦合数值模拟中应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2009-2015.
[15]	余国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed