粉性土毛管水的力学和工程特性

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 80-84.

粉性土毛管水的力学和工程特性

吴世余¹，余金煌^{1, 2}

1. 安徽省•水利部淮河水利委员会水利科学研究院，安徽蚌埠 233000；2. 合肥工业大学土木与水利工程学院，合肥 230009

收稿日期:2011-10-08 出版日期:2013-01-10 发布日期:2013-01-10
作者简介:吴世余，男，1926年生，本科，教授级高级工程师，主要从事土工和渗流方面的研究工作

Mechanical and engineering characteristics of capillary water of silty soils

WU Shi-yu¹，YU Jin-huang^{1, 2}

1. Anhui and Huaihe River Water Resources Research Institute, Bengbu, Anhui 233000, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China

Received:2011-10-08 Online:2013-01-10 Published:2013-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 阐述了毛管水对土体强度、变形和渗流的影响。粉性土既有较高的毛管水头，又有一定的渗透性，水压传递快；毛管水对此类土的地基、基坑和堤坝等工程有明显的影响。研究的主要成果有：①根据试样浸水与否的无侧限抗压强度比较试验及理论分析，证明毛管水张力增高了土体强度，强度增高的数值，试验结果和理论分析相符；②计算分析雨季粉性土地表层毛管水张力消失和土体膨胀的过程；③借砂模试验和电拟试验，分析了毛管水对堤坝渗流流态的影响，毛管水增高了渗流量和出逸点高度；④提出了砂土和粉性土毛管水头hc和渗透系数k新的经验计算式。研究成果可应用于粉性土地基、基坑和堤坝等工程。

关键词: 毛管水, 粉土, 强度, 固结, 渗流

Abstract: This paper deals with the influence of capillary water on the strength and deformation of soils, and on the seepage flow state of levees and dams. Silty soils possess both higher water head and higher permeability, water pressure transmitting rapidly. So that the influence of capillary water in the engineering with silty soils is obvious. The principal research results are: ①According to the comparison tests of unconfined compression strength with samples immersed in the water or not, and with theoretical analysis, it has been demonstrated the capillary water head results the further consolidation and strength increasing of the soil. The strength increasing values of the tests are the same as the values of theoretical calculation. ②Analyzing and calculating the decreasing process of capillary water tension accompanied by soil expansion in silty surface strata on heavy rain condition. ③Using electric analog test and sand model test, the influence of capillary water on the seepage flow state of levees and dams is studied. The capillary water results the increasing of the seepage flow quantity and the height of release point. ④Two new empirical formulae of capillary water head and permeability coefficient of sand and silty soils are presented. The research results can be applied to the engineering of foundation foundation pits, levees and dams with silty soils.

Key words: capillary water, silty soils, strength, consolidation, seepage

中图分类号:

TU 411

吴世余，余金煌 . 粉性土毛管水的力学和工程特性[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 80-84.

WU Shi-yu ，YU Jin-huang . Mechanical and engineering characteristics of capillary water of silty soils[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 80-84.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[2]	程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[3]	蒙宇涵, 张必胜, 陈征, 梅国雄, . 线性加载下含砂垫层地基固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 461-468.
[4]	樊科伟, 刘斯宏, 廖洁, 方斌昕, 王建磊, . 袋装石土工袋剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 477-484.
[5]	刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 杨建军, 孙嘉宝, . 部分排水条件下饱和黏土渐近状态本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 485-491.
[6]	马维嘉, 陈国兴, 吴琪, . 复杂加载条件下珊瑚砂抗液化强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 535-542.
[7]	涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[8]	李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[9]	刘成禹, 陈博文, 罗洪林, 阮家椿, . 满流条件下管道破损诱发渗流侵蚀的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 1-10.
[10]	刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[11]	夏才初, 喻强锋, 钱鑫, 桂洋, 庄小清. 常法向刚度条件下岩石节理剪切−渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 57-66.
[12]	王峰, 张建清, . 考虑颗粒强度尺寸效应的原型堆石料破碎特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 87-94.
[13]	李小刚, 朱长歧, 崔翔, 张珀瑜, 王睿, . 含碳酸盐混合砂的三轴剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 123-131.
[14]	郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[15]	尹光志, 鲁俊, 张东明, 李铭辉, 邓博知, 刘超, . 真三轴应力条件下钻孔围岩塑性区及增透半径研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 1-10.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed