高桩码头岸坡滑弧模式研究与变形稳定性分析

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 227-234.

高桩码头岸坡滑弧模式研究与变形稳定性分析

余神光^{1, 2}，别社安¹，李伟³，王初生³，马勇²

1. 天津大学建筑工程学院，天津 300072；2. 中交第四航务工程勘察设计院有限公司，广州 510230；3. 天津港（集团）有限公司，天津 300461

收稿日期:2011-10-14 出版日期:2013-01-10 发布日期:2013-01-10
作者简介:余神光，男，1987年生，硕士研究生，主要从事港口、海岸和海洋工程结构与岩土方面的研究

Research on slip arc mode and deformation stability of bank slope on high-piled wharf

YU Shen-guang^{1, 2}，BIE She-an¹，LI Wei³，WANG Chu-sheng³，MA Yong²

1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. Fourth Harbor Engineering Investigation and Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Communications Construction Company, Guangzhou 510230, China; 3. Tianjin Port(Group) Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300461, China

Received:2011-10-14 Online:2013-01-10 Published:2013-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 分别采用有限元强度折减法、简单条分法以及Spencer法对108组不同条件的高桩码头岸坡进行了整体稳定性分析，比较了上述3种方法计算结果的差异性与关联性，并依据有限元强度折减法系统地研究了不同岸坡滑弧模式发生的土体强度条件，分析了岸坡特征点的侧向位移随安全系数的变化关系。结果表明，有限元强度折减法与简单条分法在安全系数的定义形式上是一致的，但计算结果一般存在-1%～8%的差异；当坡体下方或后方的土体与坡体的强度指标之比小于某临界值（一般在1～2之间）时，滑弧将向深处或者码头后方扩展；而当岸坡的整体稳定安全系数接近工程规范所规定的安全阈值时，坡顶点的侧向位移一般会出现突变。最后，通过对某工程岸坡实例加固效果的分析，验证了结论的合理性和有效性。

关键词: 岸坡稳定, 有限元强度折减法, 滑弧模式, 变形稳定

Abstract: The strength reduction finite element method, the Swedish slices method and Spencer’s generalized procedure of slices are adopted to analyze the global stability of bank slops on high-piled wharves under 108 different conditions. The results are compared to demonstrate the difference and relevance among three methods. The soil strength conditions when different slip arc modes occurred are studied with the strength reduction FEM. Meanwhile, the dependence of the lateral displacement of the feature points on the safety factor is analyzed. It was indicated that there is a difference of -1%~8% between the results of the strength reduction FEM and the Swedish slices method, though the definitions of safety factor of two methods have the same form. It also demonstrated that when the ratio of the soil strength under or behind the slope body to that of the slope is less than a certain critical value usually between 1 and 2, the slip arc will expand to a deeper position or the rear of the wharf, from which we draw a conclusion that when the safety factor comes close to the safety threshold defined by the engineering standard, there will be a drastic change in the lateral displacement. In the end, the conclusion is proved to be reasonable and efficacious by a practical project.

Key words: slope stability, the strength reduction finite element method, slice arc mode, deformation stability

中图分类号:

TU 432

余神光，别社安，李伟，王初生，马勇 . 高桩码头岸坡滑弧模式研究与变形稳定性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 227-234.

YU Shen-guang ，BIE She-an ，LI Wei ，WANG Chu-sheng ，MA Yong . Research on slip arc mode and deformation stability of bank slope on high-piled wharf[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 227-234.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	涂义亮，刘新荣，钟祖良，杜立兵，王鹏, . 三类边坡失稳判据的统一性[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 173-180.
[2]	朱彦鹏，杨晓宇，马孝瑞，杨校辉，叶帅华, . 边坡稳定性分析双折减法的几个问题[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 331-338.
[3]	田洪铭，陈卫忠，郑鹏强，于建新 . 桥梁荷载下跨谷拱桥岩质桥基岸坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 379-385.
[4]	漆祖芳，姜清辉，唐志丹，周创兵. 锦屏一级水电站左岸坝肩边坡施工期稳定分析[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 531-538.
[5]	李宁，许建聪. 基于场变量的边坡稳定分析有限元强度折减法?[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 314-318.
[6]	邓检强，吕庆超，杨强，刘耀儒. 变形稳定理论在盐岩储气库优化设计中的应用[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 507-513.
[7]	陈力华，林志，李星平. 公路隧道中系统锚杆的功效研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843-1848.
[8]	程选生，郑颖人，田瑞瑞. 隧道围岩结构地震动稳定性分析的动力有限元强度折减法[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1241-1248.
[9]	钟才根，张斌. 采用不同Drucker-Prager屈服准则得到的边坡安全系数的转换[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3751-3754.
[10]	雷文杰，汪国华，薛晓晓. 有限元强度折减法在煤层底板破坏中的应用[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 299-303.
[11]	王成，徐浩，郑颖人. 隧道近接桩基的安全系数研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 260-264.
[12]	周桂云，李同春. 基于静动力有限元的边坡抗震稳定分析方法[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2303-2308.
[13]	张红，郑颖人，杨臻，王谦源，葛苏鸣. 黄土隧洞支护结构设计方法探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 473-478.
[14]	赵尚毅，郑颖人，李安洪，邱文平，唐晓松，徐俊. 多排埋入式抗滑桩在武隆县政府滑坡中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 160-164.
[15]	徐光苗，罗文静，伍永胜. 广州飞碟训练中心高边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 190-194.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed