重塑石灰土的力学特征与性能劣化机制分析

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 653-658.

重塑石灰土的力学特征与性能劣化机制分析

谈云志^{1, 2}，郑爱¹，喻波¹，夏振尧¹

1. 三峡大学三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室，湖北宜昌 443002； 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室，武汉 430071

收稿日期:2012-01-17 出版日期:2013-03-11 发布日期:2013-03-20
作者简介:谈云志，男，1979年生，博士，副教授，主要从事特殊土土力学方面的教学与科研工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51009084)；岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室开放基金项目资助(No. Z011002)；湖南省交通科技进步与创新计划项目(No. 200910，No. 201045)。

Mechanical properties and degradation mechanism of remolded lime soil

TAN Yun-zhi^{1, 2}，ZHENG Ai¹，YU Bo¹，XIA Zhen-yao¹

1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards in Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China

Received:2012-01-17 Online:2013-03-11 Published:2013-03-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 石灰土在公路等工程中应用很广泛，随着公路改扩建等工程的迅速增多，面临如何处理与利用废弃石灰土的难题。通过对比分析素土、石灰土、重塑石灰土的压缩、强度等力学指标，探讨重塑石灰土的力学特征。结果表明，重塑石灰土压缩系数与石灰土相比提高了2～3倍，无侧限抗压强度损失了30%～40%，内摩擦角增大了1.2倍，黏聚力降低了40%。提出用劣化系数评价重塑石灰土的力学特性劣化程度，并从石灰处治红黏土的团粒化、碳化、灰结机制等角度分析了重塑石灰土性能劣化的本质原因。与素土相比，石灰土的黏粒（d <0.002 mm）含量减少而粗粒（d >0.074 mm）含量增加，从而提高了石灰土的内摩擦角。但重塑过程则破化了石灰土中的胶结结构致使重塑石灰土的黏聚力降低，从而影响重塑石灰土的其他力学性能指标。

关键词: 石灰土, 重塑, 劣化系数

Abstract: Lime soils are widely used in road engineering. With the rebuilding and expanding of road engineering, it may cause many problems, such as how to treat the lime soil and how to reuse it. The compression and strength mechanical properties are discussed by comparing remolded lime soil with lime soil and pure soil. The results show that, compared to lime soil, the compression coefficient (a1-2) of remolded lime soil increases 2-3 times; the unconfined compressive strength decreases 30%-40%; the internal friction angle increases about 1.2 times and the cohesion reduces 40%. Degradation coefficient (DC) is introduced to evaluate the degradation degree of remolded lime soil. The essential degradation cause of the remolded lime soil is analyzed from the standpoints of aggregation, carbonization and hardening. Compared to pure soil, the clay (d <0.002 mm) content of lime soil decreases and coarse grain (d >0.074 mm) content increases. So, the internal friction angle of lime soil is improved. But the cemented structure between lime soil particles is broken by remolding effect. The cohesion of remolded lime soil decreases because of the remolding; and the other mechanical properties of remolded lime soil are affected.

Key words: lime soil, remolding, degradation coefficient

中图分类号:

TU 449

谈云志，郑爱，喻波，夏振尧 . 重塑石灰土的力学特征与性能劣化机制分析[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 653-658.

TAN Yun-zhi ，ZHENG Ai ，YU Bo ，XIA Zhen-yao . Mechanical properties and degradation mechanism of remolded lime soil[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 653-658.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	余良贵, 周建, 温晓贵, 徐杰, 罗凌晖, . 利用HCA研究黏土渗透系数的标准探索[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2293-2302.
[2]	林清辉，严佳佳，董梅，朱剑锋，. 大主应力方向及中主应力系数对重塑黄土小应变刚度特性影响试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1369-1376.
[3]	王娇，邵生俊，陈攀，. 非饱和重塑黄土的土水特性及压缩屈服与湿陷性的研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 217-222.
[4]	池泽成，陈善雄，周哲，戴张俊，宋瑞军, . 合肥重塑膨胀土三向膨胀力试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 381-386.
[5]	石博溢，倪万魁，王衍汇，李征征，袁志辉,. 重塑黄土压缩变形的预测模型研究[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 1963-1968.
[6]	沈扬，陶明安，王鑫，杜文汉，. 交通荷载引发主应力轴旋转下软黏土变形与强度特性试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1569-1578.
[7]	沈扬，王保光，陶明安，王鑫，杜文汉，. 重塑黏土空心圆柱试样制备技术改进及应用[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 697-701.
[8]	王鹏程，骆亚生，胡连信，王书静. 重塑黄土三轴蠕变特性研究及模型分析[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1627-1632.
[9]	谈云志，喻波，刘云，左清军，胡莫珍，郑爱. 重塑石灰土的强度恢复方法与机制初探[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 633-639.
[10]	安鹏，张爱军，刘宏泰，王婷 . 重塑饱和黄土长期渗流劣化机制及其渗透性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(7): 1965-1971.
[11]	陈波，孙德安，吕海波 . 海相软土压缩特性的试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 381-388.
[12]	郭长宝，张永双，孟庆伟，郑光，李海华 . 重塑硅藻土抗剪强度的环剪试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 109-114.
[13]	曾玲玲，洪振舜，陈福全 . 压缩过程中重塑黏土渗透系数的变化规律[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1286-1292.
[14]	邓津王兰民志坚小鹏王峻 . 黄土抗震陷变形的酸改性方法及其微观结构分析[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3624-3631.
[15]	王亮，谢健，张楠，王升位，吕一彦 . 含水率对重塑淤泥不排水强度性质的影响[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 2973-2978.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed