土石坝坡抗震极限分析上限法

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 721-726.

土石坝坡抗震极限分析上限法

杨昕光，迟世春

大连理工大学海岸与近海工程国家重点实验室，辽宁大连116024

收稿日期:2012-02-16 出版日期:2013-03-11 发布日期:2013-03-20
作者简介:杨昕光，男，1983年生，博士研究生，研究方向为高土石坝极限抗震能力。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(No. 50979014，No. 51179024)；高等学校博士点基金(No. 20090041110016)。

Upper bound method for seismic stability limit analysis of earth-rock dams

YANG Xin-guang，CHI Shi-chun

State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China

Received:2012-02-16 Online:2013-03-11 Published:2013-03-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于极限分析的上限定理，提出一种土石坝极限抗震分析的新方法。该方法假定土体为理想刚塑性材料且满足相关联流动准则，将土石坝坡滑动体划分为若干水平土条，计算各滑动土条的外功率与内能耗散，然后通过能量平衡条件，利用优化算法确定土石坝的极限抗震能力。运用所提方法，对一典型心墙土石坝进行极限抗震能力分析，研究了水平条分数以及抗剪强度参数对极限抗震能力影响。计算结果表明，水平条分数对滑裂面形状影响较大而对大坝极限抗震能力影响较小。当水平条分数增加到一定数目时大坝极限抗震能力最终趋于一个稳定值。同时，堆石料的抗剪强度对大坝极限抗震能力影响较大。通过与传统的极限平衡法对比，验证了所提方法的正确性与可行性。

关键词: 土石坝, 极限分析, 上限定理, 极限抗震能力

Abstract: A new approach based on the limit analysis upper bound theorem is proposed to study the seismic stability of earth-rock dams. First, according to the upper bound analysis, a perfectly plastic soil model is assumed with an associated flow rule. Then, the dam slope is divided into horizontal slices with regarding the sliding surface as an arbitrary surface. In order to obtain the maximum anti-seismic capability of dams and the corresponding sliding surface, the multivariate function is established by the energy-work balance equation and optimized by intelligent algorithm. For the study of the influences of shear strength parameters and horizontal slice number on the maximum anti-seismic capability and the sliding surface, the new approach is applied to a typical earth-rock dam with core wall. It is shown by the results that the horizontal slice number has a great influence on the sliding surface but a small influence on the maximum anti-seismic capability. When the horizontal slices achieve a certain number, the maximum anti-seismic capability of dams is ultimately a stable value. Meanwhile, the shear strength parameters of the rockfill materials have a great influence on the maximum anti-seismic capability. Compared with the limit equilibrium method the result illustrates the correctness and feasibility of the proposed method.

Key words: earth-rock dams, limit analysis, upper bound theorem, maximum anti-seismic capability

中图分类号:

TV 641

杨昕光，迟世春. 土石坝坡抗震极限分析上限法[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 721-726.

YANG Xin-guang，CHI Shi-chun. Upper bound method for seismic stability limit analysis of earth-rock dams[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 721-726.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	于丽, 吕城, 段儒禹, 王明年, . 考虑孔隙水压力及非线性Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则下浅埋土质隧道三维塌落机制的上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 194-204.
[2]	孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[3]	刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[4]	袁维, 刘尚各, 聂庆科, 王伟, . 基于冲切破坏模式的嵌岩桩桩端溶洞顶板临界厚度确定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[5]	陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[6]	冯凌云, 朱斌, 代加林, 孔德琼, . 深海管道水平向管−土相互作用大变形连续极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4907-4915.
[7]	张晓曦, 何思明, 樊晓一, . L型挡土墙滑裂面确定方法与地震稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4011-4020.
[8]	郭红仙, 周鼎. 软土中基坑土钉支护稳定性问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 398-404.
[9]	周雄雄, 迟世春, 贾宇峰, 谢芸菲, . 高土石坝填筑过程的精细化模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 443-450.
[10]	徐鹏，蒋关鲁，邱俊杰，林展展，王智猛,. 基于二楔块法的加筋土挡墙屈服加速度及破坏模式极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2765-2770.
[11]	尹君凡，雷勇，陈秋南，刘一新，邓加政,. 偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
[12]	严敏嘉，夏元友，刘婷婷. 地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2691-2698.
[13]	曹文贵，谭建辉，胡卫东, . 水平加筋地基极限承载力的极限上限分析法[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1955-1962.
[14]	余翔，孔宪京，邹德高，周晨光, . 覆盖层上土石坝非线性动力响应分析的地震波动输入方法[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1858-1866.
[15]	李泽，刘毅，周宇，王均星,. 基于混合离散的砌石挡土墙边坡极限承载力下限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed