›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 1545-1550.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

吸力式沉箱基础极限拉拔承载力的数值分析

王志云1-3,王忠涛1, 2,栾茂田1, 2,王 栋1, 2   

  1. 1. 大连理工大学 海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室,大连 116024;2. 大连理工大学 土木水利学院岩土工程研究所,大连 116024; 3. 大连水产学院 土木工程学院,大连 116023
  • 收稿日期:2007-01-25 出版日期:2008-06-10 发布日期:2013-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 栾茂田,男,1962年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学基本理论、海洋土力学理论与实验技术、非线性土动力学理论与计算等方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail: mtluan@dlut.edu.cn E-mail:dlutwzhy@163.com
  • 作者简介:王志云,女,1980年生,博士研究生,主要从事海洋土力学理论与计算等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 50639010; No. 50579006);国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(No. 50309001);与教育部跨世纪优秀人才培养计划研究基金资助项目(教技函[1998]2号)

Numerical analysis of ultimate uplift bearing capacity behavior of suction caisson foundations

WANG Zhi-yun1-3, WANG Zhong-tao1,2, LUAN Mao-tian1,2, WANG Dong1,2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China; 3. Civil Engineering Institute, Dalian Fisheries University, Dalian 116023, China
  • Received:2007-01-25 Online:2008-06-10 Published:2013-07-15

摘要: 作为新型的深水海洋基础型式,吸力式沉箱基础被广泛地用于系泊深水海洋设施中,从而承受巨大的倾斜上拔荷载。在上拔荷载水平分量与竖向分量的共同作用下,吸力式沉箱的承载特性及其工作性能评价是海洋工程设计与建设中的关键技术问题之一。然而现有的理论分析与试验研究并不能满足工程实践的需要,因此,对吸力式沉箱基础的极限承载力分析建立了有限元数值计算方法。当沉箱基础在快速拔出过程中,正常固结黏土处于完全不排水状态,沉箱基础发生整体破坏时表现出反向地基承载力失稳模式,此时沉箱基础所发挥的极限承载能力往往最大。为此,在数值计算中直接假定沉箱基础及其周围土体处于完全不排水状态,针对不同的沉箱长径比,分别确定了在竖向上拔荷载和水平拉拔的单独作用下沉箱基础极限承载力。对比发现:竖向上拔极限承载力有限元解能够较好地与理论计算结果相符合,而水平极限承载力解与理论计算结果存在一定的差异。

关键词: 吸力式沉箱基础, 有限元分析, 极限拉拔承载力, 拉拔荷载, 承载力理论

Abstract: As a new type of deep-water offshore foundations, suction caisson foundation is widely used to fix offshore structure or facilities. Under such a circumstance, suction caisson foundations are frequently subjected to pullout forces. Therefore the ultimate bearing capacity and performance of such foundations under combined application of both vertical and horizontal components of pullout are one of the key issues in the design and construction of offshore structures and facilities. However, the performance of such foundations has been not well understood; and current methods of evaluation and design cannot meet the increasing requirement of engineering practice. Therefore a numerical procedure based on FEM for evaluating the uplift bearing capacity behavior of suction caisson foundation is developed. On the basis of the multi-purpose finite element analysis software ABAQUS, step-by-step loading procedure is numerically implemented to simulate the progressive deformation process and failure mechanism. During the pullout of caisson foundation, the normal consolidated clay is under fully undrained state. The general shear failure of caisson foundation is characterized by an ultimate collapse pattern due to bearing capacity which is opposite to traditional failure mode of foundation subjected to vertical compressive load. It is assumed that the soils surrounding the caisson foundations are in undrained condition during pullout and their original strength is fully mobilized. Then comparative numerical computations are performed for different aspect ratios of caisson foundation to determine the ultimate bearing capacity of caisson foundations under single action of vertical pullout or horizontal pullout. The authors’ numerical results are compared with the solutions obtained by current theoretical or numerical analyses. It indicates that the uplift ultimate bearing capacity by finite element numerical method is accordance with by theoretical method, and the horizontal ultimate bearing capacity has small variant.

Key words: suction caisson foundation, finite element analysis, ultimate uplift bearing capacity, pullout load, bearing capacity theory

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 何伟杰,杨冬英,崔周飞. 考虑横向惯性下桩的纵向振动理论解和数值解对比分析[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2757-2763.
[2] 徐 江,龚维明,张 琦,戴国亮,霍少磊,杨 超, . 大口径钢管斜桩竖向承载特性数值模拟与现场试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2434-2440.
[3] 冯 君,张俊云,朱 明,江 南,. 软土地层高承台桥梁群桩基础横向承载特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 94-104.
[4] 林 聪,杨 强,王海波,李仁鸿,. 基于非线性有限元的孟底沟拱坝数值模拟研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2624-2630.
[5] 周英博,张玉军. 压力溶解对颗粒聚集岩体中热-水-应力耦合作用的弹塑性有限元分析[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1781-1790.
[6] 张思渊,张玉军. 双重孔隙-裂隙岩体中洞室变形及强度各向异性的三维有限元分析[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3583-3590.
[7] 陈 曦 ,张训维 ,陈佳林 ,金 锋 ,于玉贞,. 水位波动下非饱和心墙土坝体的渗流和稳定性[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 609-613.
[8] 张盼盼,罗 汀,姚仰平. 考虑膨胀效应UH模型的有限元实现[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 664-668.
[9] 付长静 ,李国英 ,米占宽 ,赵天龙,. 卸荷式板桩高桩梁板码头结构土压力简化计算[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2426-2432.
[10] 温立峰 ,柴军瑞 ,王 晓,. 深覆盖层上面板堆石坝应力变形特性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2386-2394.
[11] 张玉军 ,琚晓冬,. 热-水-应力-迁移耦合条件下双重孔隙-裂隙介质的抗剪强度及有限元分析[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 877-884.
[12] 肖珍珍 ,王登银 ,陈建叶 ,杨宝全 ,张 林,. 碾压混凝土高拱坝坝肩稳定及坝体开裂静动力分析[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3541-3547.
[13] 张玉军 ,张维庆,. 塑性扩容梯度对孔隙介质岩体中T-H-M 耦合作用的二维有限元分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 556-564.
[14] 张玉军 ,张维庆,. 不同的层状岩体抗剪强度表达式计算效果的有限元分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 359-364.
[15] 田建勃 ,韩晓雷 ,于清桦 ,刘江元 ,边登鹏 ,王海刚,. 碎石垫层强度与变形特性试验研究和有限元分析[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 83-89.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庄 宁,朱苦竹,李军伟. 偏压连拱隧道施工的动态模拟及最优化分析[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2875 -2880 .
[2] 尚守平,岁小溪,周志锦,刘方成,熊 伟. 橡胶颗粒-砂混合物动剪切模量的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 377 -381 .
[3] 江 浩,汪 稔,吕颖慧,孟庆山. 钙质砂中模型桩的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 780 -784 .
[4] 周永习,张得煊,罗春泳,陈 军. 饱和黄土稳态强度特性的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1486 -1490 .
[5] 肖 忠,王元战,及春宁,黄泰坤,单 旭. 波浪作用下加固软基上大圆筒结构稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2648 -2654 .
[6] 曾文泽,艾智勇. 轴对称多层可压缩渗透各向异性岩基固结分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 212 -217 .
[7] 冷 艺,栾茂田,许成顺,马太雷. 复杂应力条件下饱和砂土排水剪切强度的试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1620 -1626 .
[8] 钱岳红 ,李 杰 ,陈文涛 ,李文培. 考虑卸荷时间的深埋巷道附近破坏特性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1347 -1352 .
[9] 李建军 ,邵生俊 ,王 超. 岩质断层地基及其治理措施分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 344 -348 .
[10] 钦亚洲 ,孙 钧. 土体各向异性边界面模型隐式算法在ABAQUS软件中的实现[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 307 -313 .