›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 2023-2030.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

河谷地形对深覆盖层中防渗墙应力变形影响分析

潘 迎1, 2,何蕴龙1,周小溪3,曹学兴1   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,武汉 430072; 2. 中国市政工程中南设计研究总院有限公司,武汉 430010;3. 中国水电工程顾问集团公司,北京 100120
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-13 出版日期:2013-07-10 发布日期:2013-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 何蕴龙,男,1964年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事坝工结构研究。E-mail: ylhe2002cn@aliyun.com E-mail:panying2011@163.com
  • 作者简介:潘迎,女,1988年生,硕士研究生,主要从事高坝结构设计领域方面的研究

Analysis of effect of canyon terrain on stress and displacement of cutoff wall in dam foundation with deep overburden

PAN Ying1, 2,HE Yun-long1,ZHOU Xiao-xi3,CAO Xue-xing1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China; 2. Central and Southern China Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430010, China; 3. HydroChina Corporation, Beijing 100120, China
  • Received:2012-06-13 Online:2013-07-10 Published:2013-07-15

摘要: 为研究河谷地形对深厚覆盖层中防渗墙应力、变形的影响,以某沥青混凝土心墙堆石坝为工程背景,模拟了狭窄河谷和宽深河谷并分别建立有限元模型,坝体材料及覆盖层采用邓肯-张E-B模型,防渗墙与覆盖层、基岩之间的接触关系采用无厚度接触面模拟,进行三维非线性有限元计算,对比分析两种河谷情况下防渗墙的应力、变形情况。计算结果表明:狭窄河谷中,防渗墙沉降和水平向位移及防渗墙与覆盖层的不均匀变形均比宽深河谷小,其中不均匀变形最大减小了24.8%;宽深河谷中,防渗墙受河谷地形约束作用较弱,竖直向压应力较狭窄河谷更大,最大增加了40.3%;防渗墙的竖直向压应力最大值位置受中性点位置和河谷地形的共同影响,其中竖直向压应力最大值约30%来自墙顶坝体土压力,70%来自与覆盖层之间的负摩擦力。其研究结果可为不同地形条件下坝基防渗墙的设计提供参考。

关键词: 河谷地形, 深厚覆盖层, 防渗墙, 应力变形, 无厚度接触面

Abstract: In order to research the effect of the canyon terrain on the stress and displacement of cutoff wall in dam foundation with deep overburden, taking an asphalt concrete core rockfill dam project as a background, a narrow canyon and a broad canyon were simulated and corresponding finite element models were also established respectively. The filling materials of dam and overburden were simulated by the Duncan-Chang E-B model. The interface without thickness was used to simulate the contact relation between the cutoff wall, overburden and bedrock. A 3-D nonlinear finite element calculation was carried out to analyze the stress and displacement of cutoff wall in different canyon terrains. Results indicate that vertical deformation and horizontal displacement of cutoff wall, as well as unequal settlement between cutoff wall and overburden in narrow canyon are less than that in a broad one; the maximum unequal settlement reduced 24.8%. The cutoff wall is less restrained by the broad canyon than that in a narrow one; thus the vertical stress in the broad canyon is greater and increases by 40.3% utmost. The position of the maximum vertical stress of cutoff wall is affected both by the position of neutral point and canyon terrain. The maximum vertical stress is approximately 30% by the weight of embankment and 70% by negative skin friction. The studied results can provide a reference for the design of cutoff wall in dam foundation in different canyon terrains.

Key words: canyon terrain, deep overburden, cutoff wall, stress and displacement, interface without thickness

中图分类号: 

  • TV 641
[1] 余挺, 邵磊. 含软弱土层的深厚河床覆盖层坝基动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 267-277.
[2] 徐浩青, 周爱兆, 姜朋明, 刘顺青, 宋苗苗, 陈亮, . 不同砂−膨润土垂直防渗墙填筑土料的掺量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 424-430.
[3] 李 波,肖先波,徐唐锦,周 嵩,. 泥皮存在时防渗墙与复合土工膜联接型式模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1761-1766.
[4] 张文杰,楼晓红,高佳雯. 高塌落度防渗墙填料扩散系数快速测定的透析试验[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 523-528.
[5] 刘天翔,王忠福, . 隧道正交穿越深厚滑坡体的相互影响分析与应对措施[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 265-274.
[6] 张智超,陈育民,刘汉龙,柳 侃,叶龙珍,. 微型桩-加筋土挡墙应力变形特性的多因素分析[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1911-1918.
[7] 吴梦喜,余 挺,张 琦,. 深厚覆盖层潜蚀对大坝应力变形影响的有限元模拟[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2087-2095.
[8] 李 赛,汪 优,秦志浩,刘建华,. 基于统计损伤本构模型的改进桩-土接触面模型研究[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 1947-1955.
[9] 朱 伟 ,徐浩青 ,王升位 ,范惜辉,. CaCl2溶液对不同黏土基防渗墙渗透性的影响[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1224-1230.
[10] 温立峰 ,柴军瑞 ,王 晓,. 深覆盖层上面板堆石坝应力变形特性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2386-2394.
[11] 罗 超 ,楼梦麟 ,桂国庆,. 确定大跨连续刚构桥地震动输入时程方法比较[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 414-422.
[12] 刘光明、袁鸿鹄、黄卫红、刘 淼、王芝银、. 大宁水库防渗墙受墙侧回填施工影响的数值模拟[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1786-1790.
[13] 徐杨青 ,刘国锋 ,盛永清 . 深基坑嵌岩地下连续墙隔渗效果分析与评价方法研究[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 2905-2910.
[14] 蒋凯乐 ,李云鹏 ,张如满 ,张琦伟 . 塑性混凝土防渗墙土反力系数反演[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 389-395.
[15] 罗玉龙,吴 强,詹美礼,盛金昌. 考虑应力状态的悬挂式防渗墙-砂砾石地基管涌临界坡降试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 73-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李英勇,张顶立,张宏博,宋修广. 边坡加固中预应力锚索失效机制与失效效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[2] 梁健伟,房营光,谷任国. 极细颗粒黏土渗流的微电场效应分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3043 -3050 .
[3] 王丽艳,姜朋明,刘汉龙. 砂性地基中防波堤地震残余变形机制分析与液化度预测法[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3556 -3562 .
[4] 李秀珍,王成华,邓宏艳. DDA法和Fisher判别法在潜在滑坡判识中的应用比较[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 186 -192 .
[5] 谷拴成,苏培莉,王建文,王宏科. 烧变岩体特性及其注浆扩散行为研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 60 -63 .
[6] 吉武军. 黄土隧道工程问题调查分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 387 -390 .
[7] 陈力华 ,林 志 ,李星平. 公路隧道中系统锚杆的功效研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843 -1848 .
[8] 陈立文,孙德安. 不同应力路径下水土耦合超固结黏土分叉分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2922 -2928 .
[9] 郑 刚 张立明 刁 钰. 开挖条件下坑底工程桩工作性状及沉降计算分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3089 -3096 .
[10] 赵明华,雷 勇,张 锐. 岩溶区桩基冲切破坏模式及安全厚度研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 524 -530 .