›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 2059-2064.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于弹性力学的诱导劈裂注浆机制分析

黄明利1,管晓明1,吕奇峰2   

  1. 1. 北京交通大学 土木建筑工程学院,北京 100044;2. 清华大学 土木水利学院,北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2012-07-13 出版日期:2013-07-10 发布日期:2013-07-15
  • 作者简介:黄明利,男,1969年生,博士(后),教授,主要从事隧道与地铁施工力学以及岩土注浆理论和检测技术的研究与教学工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 50978016);北京交通大学研究生创新资助项目(No. 2012YJS080)

Mechanism analysis of induced fracture grouting based on elasticity

HUANG Ming-li1,GUAN Xiao-ming1,LÜ Qi-feng2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2012-07-13 Online:2013-07-10 Published:2013-07-15

摘要: 针对隧道内水平超前劈裂注浆中浆液劈裂方向随机性的问题,提出一种诱导劈裂注浆方法,可以控制和改变浆液的劈裂方向。首先,基于弹性力学理论及其基本假定,分析竖向地应力大于水平地应力条件下对单一土层进行劈裂注浆时浆液沿竖向劈裂的力学机制,在此基础上探讨改变浆液劈裂方向为水平劈裂的必要性和诱导方法,并从应力集中的角度分析诱导劈裂注浆的力学机制;其次,采用有限元法研究注浆孔孔周劈裂方向控制点的应力随侧向压力系数和诱导孔与注浆孔间距变化而变化的情况,得出实现诱导劈裂注浆时两孔间距及侧向压力系数应满足的条件,并拟合两孔间距临界值的计算公式。结果表明:在离注浆孔上、下方4倍注浆孔径以内对称布设诱导孔,改变了注浆孔孔周劈裂方向控制点的应力场。当两孔间距小于实现诱导的临界距离值时,注浆孔孔周控制点的应力大小发生转换,浆液的劈裂方向发生改变,将沿水平方向劈裂。诱导孔与注浆孔间距的临界值会随着侧向压力系数的增大而逐渐增大。

关键词: 诱导劈裂注浆, 弹性分析, 孔间距, 侧向压力系数, 有限元

Abstract: An induced fracture grouting method has been developed to solve the randomness of the splitting direction of fracture grouting in soil in tunnel. The objective of the method is to control and change the splitting direction of the soil. The results can be used to guide the design and construction of induced fracture grouting. Based on the elastic theory and its basic assumptions, the mechanism of fracture grouting in a single layered soil under the condition that the vertical in-situ stress is larger than horizontal in-situ stress is analyzed. And then the necessity of changing the splitting direction into horizontal as well as the induced method is discussed. The mechanism of induced fracture grouting is analyzed according to the stress concentration theory. By using the finite element method, a research about the stress distribution around the grouting hole is performed, in order to find out how it changes with the lateral pressure coefficient and distance between the grouting hole and the induced hole. The requirements about the lateral pressure coefficient and distance between the above two holes to achieve induced fracture grouting are studied. The formula for calculating critical value of distance between the above two holes is fitted. It is concluded that it appears possible to change the stress distribution around the grouting hole by excavating symmetrically the induced holes at its top and bottom positions; and the distance needs less than 4 times the diameter of the grouting hole. While the distance between the grouting hole and induced hole is less than the critical distance, the stresses of the control points around the grouting hole transform, as a result the slurry would split horizontally. In addition, the critical distance between the induced hole and grouting hole increases if the lateral pressure coefficient increases.

Key words: induced fracture grouting, elastic analysis, distance between the induced hole and grouting hole, lateral pressure coefficient, finite element method

中图分类号: 

  • U 455
[1] 孙锐, 杨峰, 阳军生, 赵乙丁, 郑响凑, 罗静静, 姚捷, . 基于二阶锥规划与高阶单元的 自适应上限有限元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 687-694.
[2] 叶观宝, 郑文强, 张 振, . 大面积填土场地中摩擦型桩负摩阻力分布特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 440-448.
[3] 赵密, 欧阳文龙, 黄景琦, 杜修力, 赵旭, . P波作用下跨断层隧道轴线地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3645-3655.
[4] 张海廷, 杨林青, 郭芳, . 基于SBFEM的层状地基埋置管道动力 响应求解与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2713-2722.
[5] 曹洪, 胡瑶, 骆冠勇. 滤管两端均不在含水层层面的承压不 完整井近似计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2774-2780.
[6] 王翔南, 李全明, 于玉贞, 喻葭临, 吕禾, . 基于扩展有限元法对土体滑坡破坏过程的模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2435-2442.
[7] 周小文, 程 力, 周 密, 王 齐, . 离心机中球形贯入仪贯入黏土特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[8] 梅慧浩, 冷伍明, 聂如松, 刘文劼, 伍晓伟, . 重载铁路路基面动应力峰值随机分布特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1603-1613.
[9] 吴顺川, 马 骏, 程 业, 成子桥, 李建宇, . 平台巴西圆盘研究综述及三维启裂点研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1239-1247.
[10] 邱 敏, 袁 青, 李长俊, 肖超超, . 基于孔穴扩张理论的黏土不排水抗剪强度 计算方法对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1059-1066.
[11] 郑安兴, 罗先启, 陈振华, . 基于扩展有限元法的岩体水力劈裂耦合模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 799-808.
[12] 许江, 宋肖徵, 彭守建, 张超林, 李奇贤, 张小蕾, . 顺层钻孔布置间距对煤层瓦斯抽采效果影响的 物理模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4581-4589.
[13] 王冬勇, 陈曦, 于玉贞, 吕彦楠, . 基于二阶锥规划有限元增量加载法的条形浅基础极限承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4890-4896.
[14] 刘庆彬, 潘懋, 刘洁, 郭艳军, 张小双, 姚健鹏, 李芳玉, . 基于ParaView的Abaqus有限元输出结果的 可视化与虚拟现实[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4916-4924.
[15] 刘锋涛, 张绍发, 戴北冰, 张澄博, 林凯荣, . 边坡稳定分析刚体有限元上限法的锥规划模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4084-4091.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘 晓,唐辉明,刘 瑜. 基于集对分析和模糊马尔可夫链的滑坡变形预测新方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3399 -3405 .
[2] 胡大伟,周 辉,谢守益,张 凯,邵建富,冯夏庭. 大理岩破坏阶段Biot系数研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3727 -3732 .
[3] 朱建明,彭新坡,姚仰平,徐金海. SMP准则在计算煤柱极限强度中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2987 -2990 .
[4] 原喜忠,李 宁,赵秀云,杨银涛. 东北多年冻土地区地基承载力对气候变化敏感性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3265 -3272 .
[5] 白 冰,李小春,石 露,唐礼忠. 弹塑性应力-应变曲线的斜率恒等式及其验证和应用[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3789 -3792 .
[6] 唐利民. 地基沉降预测模型的正则化算法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3945 -3948 .
[7] 李占海,朱万成,冯夏庭,李绍军,周 辉,陈炳瑞. 侧压力系数对马蹄形隧道损伤破坏的影响研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 434 -441 .
[8] 蔡辉腾,危福泉,蔡宗文. 重庆主城区粉质黏土动力特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 224 -228 .
[9] 宋 玲 ,刘奉银 ,李 宁 . 旋压入土式静力触探机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 787 -0792 .
[10] 金解放 ,李夕兵 ,殷志强 ,邹 洋. 循环冲击下波阻抗定义岩石损伤变量的研究[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1385 -1393 .