›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 1723-1731.

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

李家峡水电站坝前水库滑坡蓄水前后稳定性预测

白俊光1, 2,吕生弟2,韩建设2   

  1. 1.天津大学,天津 300072;2.中国水电顾问集团西北勘测设计研究院,西安 710056
  • 收稿日期:2007-11-15 出版日期:2008-07-10 发布日期:2013-07-27
  • 作者简介:白俊光,男,1963年生,教授级高工,主要从事岩土工程、水工结构设计与咨询工作。

Stability prediction of reservoir landslide of Lijiaxia Hydropower station before and after reservoir impounding

BAI Jun-guang1, 2, LÜ Sheng-di2, HAN Jian-she2   

  1. 1. Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. Northwest Investigation Design and Research Institute, China Hydropower Engineering Consulting Group Corporation, Xi’an 710065, China
  • Received:2007-11-15 Online:2008-07-10 Published:2013-07-27

摘要: 基于位移监测、数值计算、室内和现场试验等成果,从动力学角度开展了李家峡坝前水库滑坡稳定性预测的系统研究,获得了其滑带土的蠕变特性及水库滑坡的蠕滑机制,提出滑面剪应力比和滑带土黏滞系数的增减是决定滑坡能否从蠕滑转入剧滑的内在条件;通过模拟水库运行环境,完成了代表性滑块的现场促滑试验,研究表明:该类试验既是论证滑坡蠕滑机制的可靠方法,也是水库滑坡增稳治理的有效手段之一。

关键词: 水库滑坡, 蠕滑机制, 稳定性预测, 李家峡水电站

Abstract: According to the landslide dynamics, a systematic study on the stability prediction of reservoir landslide of Lijiaxia Hydropower Station is conducted based on the results of in situ monitoring, numerical analysis, laboratory and in-situ tests. The creep characteristics of the soil in the sliding zone and the creep-sliding mechanism of the reservoir landslide are obtained. It is shown that the varieties of both the shear stress ratio on the sliding plane and the viscosity coefficient of the soil in the sliding zone play an important role in transforming the landslide behavior from creep sliding to sudden sliding. Moreover, a typical sliding block of the landslide is chosen to carry out in-situ sliding test; the test is implemented under the simulated environment of reservoir; and the variation of the reservoir water level is taken into account. The study shows that in situ sliding tests can be not only a rational approach of verifying creep-sliding mechanism of reservoir landslide but also an effective measure to enhance the stability of landslide.

Key words: reservoir landslide, creep-sliding mechanism, stability prediction, Lijiaxia Hydropower Station

中图分类号: 

  • TV 697.2+3
[1] 卢书强 ,易庆林 ,易 武 ,黄海峰 ,张国栋 , . 三峡库区树坪滑坡变形失稳机制分析[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1123-1130.
[2] 肖诗荣 ,卢树盛 ,管宏飞 ,宋桂林,. 三峡库区凉水井滑坡地质力学模型研究[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3534-3542.
[3] 张桂荣 ,程 伟. 降雨及库水位联合作用下秭归八字门滑坡稳定性预测[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 476-0482.
[4] 宋 琨 ,晏鄂川 ,朱大鹏 ,赵庆远. 基于滑体渗透性与库水变动的滑坡稳定性变化规律研究[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2798-2802.
[5] 李明超,王忠耀,刘 杰. 水库库岸滑坡体稳定性与三维可视化模拟分析系统研究[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 270-274.
[6] 梁桂兰, 徐卫亚. 基于T-S模型的模糊神经网络在边坡稳定评价中的应用[J]. , 2006, 27(S2): 359-364.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 关云飞,高 峰,赵维炳,俞 缙. ANSYS软件中修正剑桥模型的二次开发[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 976 -980 .
[2] 米海珍,高 春. 生石灰膨胀特性的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1253 -1256 .
[3] 孙熙平,张宝华,张 强,王笑难. 重力式码头基床遭水流冲刷后的稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3184 -3190 .
[4] 陈敬虞,龚晓南,邓亚虹. 软黏土层一维有限应变固结的超静孔压消散研究[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 191 -195 .
[5] 张春会,赵全胜. 基于ARCGIS的矿山开采沉陷灾害预警系统[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2197 -2202 .
[6] 孙 建 ,王连国 ,唐芙蓉 ,沈义峰 ,龚世龙. 倾斜煤层底板破坏特征的微震监测[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1589 -1595 .
[7] 杨永香 ,周 健 ,贾敏才 ,胡金虎. 饱和砂土液化特性的可视化试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1643 -1648 .
[8] 徐正明,薛 强,赵 颖. 改性污泥复合材料时间效应三轴力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1713 -1718 .
[9] 陈 明 ,胡英国 ,卢文波 ,严 鹏 ,周创兵. 锦屏二级水电站引水隧洞爆破开挖损伤特性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 172 -177 .
[10] 乔春江 ,陈卫忠 ,王 辉 ,田洪铭 ,谭贤君. 浅埋破碎地层隧道施工方法研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 455 -462 .