混凝土夯扩桩和土工格室加固铁路基床试验研究

›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8): 2157-2162.

混凝土夯扩桩和土工格室加固铁路基床试验研究

肖宏^1，2，罗强²，邓江东²，华明³

1. 北京交通大学土木建筑工程学院，北京 100044；2. 西南交通大学土木工程学院，成都 610031；3. 成都铁路局工务处，成都 610081

收稿日期:2006-06-23 出版日期:2008-08-11 发布日期:2013-08-02
作者简介:肖宏，男，1978年生，博士，主要从事高速铁路路基工程、轨道工程科学研究工作

Test study of reinforcing railway subgrades by using concrete compacted base-enlarged piles and geogrids

XIAO Hong^{1, 2}, LUO Qiang², DENG Jiang-dong², HUA Ming³

1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijng 100044, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China; 3. Engineering Department, Chengdu Railway Administration, Chengdu 610081, China

Received:2006-06-23 Online:2008-08-11 Published:2013-08-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了考察半干硬性混凝土夯扩桩与土工格室联合作用加固既有线路基基床病害的效果，结合达成铁路k337段成都黏土（膨胀土）基床病害工点的整治，选取了3个测试断面，分别测试了经不同加固方案处理后的轨道平顺性与基床不同高度处在机车荷载作用下的动应力、振动变形和加速度等动力响应。试验表明，3个测试断面的动力作用水平均在合理的范围内，动力学指标均低于相关限值；行车速度对动应力、动位移、加速度都有不同程度的影响。其中，加速度随行车速度的提高而增大最为明显；线路的平顺性与稳定程度对线路及路基结构的动力学（动应力、振动变形、加速度）响应有显著影响。

关键词: 混凝土夯扩桩, 基床加固, 机车荷载, 动态响应, 现场试验

Abstract: Three test sections were designed to investigate their effectiveness in reinforcing railway subgrades by using concrete compacted base-enlarged piles and geogrids based on the construction practice in the k337?665 ? ?770 section of the Da-Cheng Railway. Track smoothness and associated dynamic responses such as the stress, dynamic deformation and acceleration rate under the locomotive load are recorded during the tests. Test results show that the dynamic response in test sections is below the relevant limits. Running speed has an different impact, and the rule of acceleration increase with run-up is most obvious. Smoothness and stabilizing of railway have remarkable influence on dynamic responses such as the stress, dynamic deformation and acceleration rate in railway line and subgrade structure.

Key words: concrete compacted base-enlarged pile, subgrade reinforcing, locomotive load, dynamic response, field experiment

中图分类号:

TU 473

肖宏，罗强，邓江东，华明 . 混凝土夯扩桩和土工格室加固铁路基床试验研究[J]. , 2008, 29(8): 2157-2162.

XIAO Hong , LUO Qiang , DENG Jiang-dong , HUA Ming . Test study of reinforcing railway subgrades by using concrete compacted base-enlarged piles and geogrids[J]. , 2008, 29(8): 2157-2162.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	余瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[2]	李驰, 王硕, 王燕星, 高瑜, 斯日古楞, . 沙漠微生物矿化覆膜及其稳定性的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1291-1298.
[3]	王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[4]	信亚雯, 周志芳, 马筠, 李鸣威, 陈朦, 汪姗, 胡尊乐, . 基于现场双管试验确定弱透水层水力参数的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1535-1542.
[5]	崔光耀, 祁家所, 王明胜, . 片理化玄武岩隧道围岩大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 231-237.
[6]	王炳龙，梅祯，肖军华. 土工格室补强路基整治路基病害的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 325-332.
[7]	郭飞，陶连金，孔恒，马红红，张丽丽，张新全,. 兰州砂卵石地层盾构施工振动传播及衰减特性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3377-3384.
[8]	喻豪俊，彭社琴，赵其华,. 碎石土斜坡水平受荷桩承载特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2537-2545.
[9]	王翔鹰，陈育民，江强，刘汉龙, . 抗液化排水刚性桩沉桩过程的土压力响应[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2184-2192.
[10]	付海清，袁晓铭，王淼，. 基于现场液化试验的饱和砂土孔压增量计算模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1611-1618.
[11]	李自强，徐湉源，吴秋军，于丽，王明年，王子健，. 破碎围岩重载铁路隧道基底结构动力特性现场试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 949-956.
[12]	王新志，谌民，魏厚振，孟庆山，余克服，. 车辆荷载作用下钙质砂路基的动态响应试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4093-4101.
[13]	王洋，冯君，谢先当，赖冰，杨涛，. 微型桩组合抗滑结构受力机制的现场试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4226-4231.
[14]	李术才，陈红宾，章冲，龚英杰，李会良，丁万涛，王琦,. 粉质黏土隧道超前支护作用效果研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 287-294.
[15]	孙凯强，唐朝生，刘昌黎，李昊达，王鹏，冷挺. 土体龟裂研究方法[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 11-26.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed