›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 2378-2382.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

静动力排水固结法处理淤泥软基振动试验研究

李彰明,林军华   

  1. 广东工业大学 岩土工程技术开发中心,广州 510090
  • 收稿日期:2006-12-27 出版日期:2008-09-10 发布日期:2013-08-03
  • 作者简介:李彰明,男,1955年生,教授,博士,主要从事岩土力学与工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    广东省自然科学基金项目(No. 06021462,No. 04009477),广东省重点学科基金资助项目

In-situ tests and analyses on vibration influences during mud ground improvement with static-dynamic drainage consolidation

LI Zhang-ming, LIN Jun-hua   

  1. Technique Center of Geotechnical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510090, China
  • Received:2006-12-27 Online:2008-09-10 Published:2013-08-03

摘要: 对于高含水率、大孔隙比的深厚淤泥地基,在静动力排水固结法处理中,采用组合式高效夯击减震锤(SAAT)等4种不同形状尺寸的典型夯锤,以975~1 125 kN•m单击夯击能夯击,进行场地振动加速度及夯沉量原位对比测试,获得SAAT夯锤与地基土首次接触、回弹和二次作用历时分别为15,80,35 ms,各锤作用下竖向与水平向加速度分别在10 m与5 m距离内急剧降低,得到满足规范(烈度Ⅶ度)安全要求时SAAT及各夯锤夯击综合安全距离为20~30 m,其中SAAT所需安全距离最小。结果表明,采用SAAT可明显提高夯击效率,并可有效地减小对周边环境的振动影响。此外,对该条件下夯击冲击波的传播及衰减规律进行了总结与分析。

关键词: 淤泥软基, 静动力排水固结, 振动影响, 组合减震锤, 试验及分析

Abstract: Under the condition of tamping energy 975-1 125 kN•m per blow with four kinds of typic tampers including the shock absorbed and assembled tamper (SAAT) designed by the first author, the tests of vibration acceleration and comparative tamping settlement are carried out in-situ during the improvement of mud ground with high water content and great void ratio by using the static-dynamic drainage consolidation (SDDC); SAAT first contact with ground, rebound, and impact secondary action lasted for 15ms, 80 ms and 35 ms respectively; vertical and horizontal acceleration under the four temper action descend sharp within 10 m and 5m respectively; the synthesized safety distances satisfying the requirement of relevant code (under seismic intensity grade Ⅶ)are obtained as 20-30 m under the condition, and the safety distance for SAAT is least; the result shows that the SAAT enhances the effect of MSDDC in evidence and diminishes vibration influence on surrounding environment obviously. Besides, transmissions of vibration acceleration produced by impacting are analyzed.

Key words: mud ground, static-dynamic drainage consolidation, vibration influence, shock absorbed and assembled tamper(SAAT), test and analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU413
[1] 钱晓敏,李彰明,曾文秀. 冲击荷载下淤泥地基上覆土层合理厚度试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 841-846.
[2] 龚 伦 , 仇文革. 引水隧洞下穿铁路隧道近接施工振动影响研究[J]. , 2006, 27(S2): 779-783.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 杨 强,刘耀儒,冷旷代,吕庆超,杨春和. 能源储备地下库群稳定性与连锁破坏分析[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3553 -3561 .
[3] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[4] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[5] 雷明锋,彭立敏,施成华,安永林. 长大深基坑施工空间效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1579 -1584 .
[6] 胡勇刚,罗 强,张 良,黄 晶,陈亚美. 基于离心模型试验的水泥土搅拌法加固斜坡软弱土地基变形特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2207 -2213 .
[7] 王学武,许尚杰,党发宁,程素珍. 水位骤降时的非饱和坝坡稳定分析[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2760 -2764 .
[8] 杨召亮,孙冠华,郑 宏. 基于潘氏极大值原理的边坡稳定性的整体分析法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 559 -563 .
[9] 许 江,唐晓军,李树春,杨红伟,陶云奇. 周期性循环载荷作用下岩石声发射规律试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1241 -1246 .
[10] 王光进,杨春和,张 超,马洪岭,孔祥云,侯克鹏. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .