›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11): 3133-3138.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土工格室加筋土的大尺寸直剪试验研究

刘 炜1,汪益敏1,陈页开1,周 刚2,余继东2,黄放军2   

  1. 1. 华南理工大学 交通学院,广州 510640;2. 广东梅河高速公路有限公司,广东 兴宁 514500
  • 收稿日期:2007-01-12 出版日期:2008-11-10 发布日期:2013-08-07
  • 作者简介:刘炜,男,1981年生,硕士,主要从事土工合成材料与填料的研究

Research on large size direct shear test for geocell reinforced soil

LIU Wei1, WANG Yi-min1, CHEN Ye-kai1, ZHOU Gang2, YU Ji-dong2, HUANG Fang-jun2   

  1. 1. School of Traffic and Communications, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China; 2. Guangdong Meihe Expressway Limited Corporation, Xingning 514500, China
  • Received:2007-01-12 Online:2008-11-10 Published:2013-08-07

摘要: 采用自行研制的500 mm?500 mm?400 mm(长?宽?高)大尺寸直剪仪,对土工格室加筋土以及土工格室加筋水泥稳定土的剪切性能进行了试验研究。通过大尺寸直剪试验模拟土工格室加筋土的剪切作用过程,得出加筋土剪切应力与剪切应变关系为非线性确定了土工格室加筋土的抗剪强度指标以及土工格室对土的抗剪强度增强机理,土工格室加筋土的黏聚力提高较大,内摩擦角变化相对较小。通过对素土和掺入量为5 %的水泥稳定土进行常规直剪试验、大尺寸直剪试验和三轴压缩试验对比分析,探讨不同试验方法对抗剪强度指标的影响,得出3种试验方法对应的抗剪强度指标及其相对大小;即素土的摩擦角大小依次为:三轴试验小于大尺寸直剪试验小于常规直剪试验,素土的黏聚力大小依次为:大尺寸直剪试验小于三轴试验小于常规直剪试验;水泥稳定土的摩擦角大小为:三轴试验小于大尺寸直剪试验,黏聚力结果比较大小依次为:三轴试验小于大尺寸直剪试验。

关键词: 土工格室, 大尺寸, 直剪试验, 三轴压缩试验, 水泥稳定土

Abstract: The experimental research on shear properties of geocell reinforced soil and geocell reinforced cement stabilized soil was carried out by using a large size direct shear equipment (500 mm?500 mm?400 mm, length?width?height) which was developed by South China University of Technology. Through the experiments, the shearing process of geocell reinforced soil was simulated. The shear strength indices and its strengthening theory by mechanics were determined. The experimental results show that the relationship curve of shear stress to shear strain of geocell reinforced soil is nonlinear. In addition, the cohesive force index was increased greatly. The friction angle was increased relatively less. Furthermore, on the purpose of understanding the influences of testing methods, three kinds of shear tests including regular direct shear test, large size direct shear test and triaxial compression test with in-situ soil and 5 % dosage of cement stabilized soil were conducted. The corresponding shear strength indices of different kinds of testing methods are in sequence from less to more as below: Friction angle of soil: triaxial compression test less than large size direct shear test less than regular direct shear test. Cohesive of soil: large size direct shear test is less than triaxial compression test less than regular direct shear test. Friction angle of cement stabilized soil: triaxial compression test is less than large size direct shear test. Cohesive force of cement stabilized soil: triaxial compression test less than large size direct shear test.

Key words: geocell, large size, direct shear test, triaxial compression test, cement stabilized soil

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432
[1] 李文轩, 卞士海, 李国英, 吴俊杰, . 粗粒料接触面模型及其在土石坝工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2379-2388.
[2] 陈国庆, 唐 鹏, 李光明, 张广泽, 王 栋, . 岩桥直剪试验声发射频谱特征及主破裂前兆分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1649-1656.
[3] 周 辉, 程广坦, 朱 勇, 陈 珺, 卢景景, 崔国建, 杨聘卿, . 大理岩规则齿形结构面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[4] 秦昌安, 陈国庆, 郑海君, 唐 鹏. 端部岩桥直剪破坏试验及断裂条件[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 642-653.
[5] 崔德山, 陈 琼, 项 伟, 王菁莪, . 黄土坡滑坡饱和滑带土三轴压缩应力松弛试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 209-216.
[6] 崔国建,张传庆,刘立鹏,周 辉,程广坦,. 锚杆杆体–砂浆界面力学特性的剪切速率效应研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 275-281.
[7] 王炳龙,梅 祯,肖军华. 土工格室补强路基整治路基病害的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 325-332.
[8] 魏匡民,陈生水,李国英,吴俊杰, . 陡峻河谷高面板坝坝体与坝基接触效应[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3415-3424.
[9] 高 樯,温 智,王大雁,牛富俊,谢艳丽,苟廷韬,. 基于冻融交界面直剪试验的冻土斜坡失稳过程研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2814-2822.
[10] 梁 程,徐 超, . 土工格室加筋土垫层路堤临界高度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2984-2990.
[11] 陈 琛,冷伍明,杨 奇,金子豪,聂如松,邱 鋆,. 混凝土桩-泥皮-砂土接触面力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2461-2472.
[12] 赵 坤,陈卫忠,赵武胜,杨典森,宋万鹏,李 灿,马少森, . 地下工程衬砌与减震层接触面力学特性直剪试验及数值仿真[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2662-2670.
[13] 谢 涛,罗 强,张 良,连继峰,于曰明, . 主动与被动状态下墙体侧向位移近似计算[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1682-1690.
[14] 王永洪,张明义,刘俊伟,白晓宇, . 超孔隙水压力对低塑性黏性土桩土界面抗剪强度的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 831-838.
[15] 周 辉,程广坦,朱 勇,卢景景,陈 珺,崔国建,李振国,. 基于三维扫描和三维雕刻技术的岩石结构面原状重构方法及其力学特性[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 417-425.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 唐明明,王芝银,马兰平,曾志华,张之沛. 油气管道穿越黄土冲沟的管线设计参数研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1314 -1318 .
[2] 徐 明,陈金锋,宋二祥. 陡坡寺中微风化料的大型三轴试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2496 -2500 .
[3] 林 杭,曹 平,李江腾,江学良,何忠明. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的三维边坡变形稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3656 -3660 .
[4] 牛文杰,叶为民,刘绍刚,禹海涛. 考虑饱和-非饱和渗流的土坡极限分析[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2477 -2482 .
[5] 王可良,刘 玲,隋同波,徐运海, 胡廷正. 坝体岩基-橡胶粉改性混凝土现场抗剪(断)试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 753 -756 .
[6] 林达明,尚彦军,孙福军,孙元春,吴锋波,刘志强. 岩体强度估算方法研究及应用[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 837 -842 .
[7] 邓东平,李 亮,赵炼恒. 基于Janbu法的边坡整体稳定性滑动面搜索新方法[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 891 -898 .
[8] 金旭浩 ,卢文波 ,田 勇 ,严 鹏 ,陈 明. 岩石爆破过程S波的产生机制分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 228 -232 .
[9] 李建军,邵生俊,杨扶银,杨春鸣. 防渗墙粗粒土槽孔泥皮的抗渗性试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1087 -1093 .
[10] 李 辉 ,晏鄂川 ,杨建国 ,吕 坤 . 库水条件下滑坡体与挡墙相互作用研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1593 -1600 .