›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 2151-2157.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

击实黏土单轴拉伸特性试验研究

张 云1,王惠敏2,鄢丽芬1   

  1. 1.南京大学 地球科学与工程学院,南京 210093;2.山东正元建设工程有限责任公司,济南 250101
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-22 出版日期:2013-08-12 发布日期:2013-08-13
  • 作者简介:张云,女,1965年生,博士,教授,主要研究方向为复杂应力条件下土体的变形与强度以及开采地下水引起的地面沉降和地裂缝

Test research on tensile properties of compacted clay

ZHANG Yun1, WANG Hui-min2, YAN Li-fen1   

  1. 1 .School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China; 2. Shangdong Zhengyuan Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Jinan 250101, China
  • Received:2012-06-22 Online:2013-08-12 Published:2013-08-13

摘要: 为研究土的拉伸特性,对击实黏土进行直接拉伸试验。试验表明,不同抗拉强度的击实黏土具有不同的拉伸应力-应变曲线型式,即应变软化型、应变硬化型和应变强化型;在试验涉及的干密度和含水率范围内,击实黏土的抗拉强度随干密度的增加而增加,随含水率的增加而减小,且具有较好的线性关系;拉伸速率对击实黏土的抗拉强度和应力-应变曲线的型式也有明显影响,对同一干密度和含水率的土样,低拉伸速率测得的抗拉强度往往较小,且应力-应变曲线为软化型,而较高的拉伸速率测得的抗拉强度较大,且应力-应变曲线为强化型。

关键词: 单轴直接拉伸试验, 击实黏土, 应力-应变曲线, 抗拉强度

Abstract: In order to research the tensile properties of compacted clay, a conventional triaxial test apparatus was modified to a uniaxial tensile apparatus for clays, by which clay samples can be extended and the stress and corresponding strain of the samples can be measured directly. A series of laboratory tests were conducted to investigate the tensile properties of compacted clay. The tested clay samples have various moisture contents (from 16% to 24%) and various dry densities (from 1.29 g/cm3 to 1.65 g/cm3), which have impacts not only on the tensile strength of samples, but also on the pattern of tensile stress-strain curves. It is found that there are three patterns of stress-strain curves for the tension of clay soil, i. e. strain-softening, strain-hardening, and strain-strengthening, corresponding to the increasing tensile strength and failure strain. The tensile strength of compacted clay approximately increases with its dry density and decreases with its moisture content linearly. With the increasing dry density and decreasing moisture content, the pattern of stress-strain curves of the clay samples changes from strain-softening to strain-hardening, then to strain-strengthening pattern. The tensile rate has obvious effect on the measured tensile strength and the pattern of stress-strain curves. For the samples with identical dry density and moisture content, lower tensile rate results in smaller measured tensile strength and strain-softening stress-strain curves; and higher tensile rate causes greater measured tensile strength and strain-strengthening stress-strain curves.

Key words: uniaxial direct tensile test, compacted clay, stress-strain curve, tensile strength

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 吴顺川, 马 骏, 程 业, 成子桥, 李建宇, . 平台巴西圆盘研究综述及三维启裂点研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1239-1247.
[2] 王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[3] 吉恩跃, 陈生水, 傅中志, . 掺砾心墙料拉裂力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4777-4782.
[4] 宋洪强, 左建平, 陈 岩, 黎立云, 洪紫杰, . 基于岩石破坏全过程能量特征改进的能量跌落系数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 91-98.
[5] 高桂云,王成虎,王春权,. 双圆环直接拉伸试验试样最优尺寸范围研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 191-202.
[6] 许宏发,柏 准,齐亮亮,耿汉生,马林建,刘 斌, . 基于全应力-应变曲线的软岩蠕变寿命估计[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1973-1980.
[7] 刘跃东,林 健,冯彦军,司林坡,. 基于水压致裂法的岩石抗拉强度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1781-1788.
[8] 陈卫昌,王思敬,李 黎,张晓平,王彦兵, . 改性料礓石力学性质试验[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1796-1804.
[9] 滕尚永, 杨圣奇, 黄彦华, 田文岭, . 裂隙充填影响巴西圆盘抗拉力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4493-4507.
[10] 吴秋红,赵伏军,李夕兵,王世鸣,王 斌,周志华,. 径向压缩下圆环砂岩样的力学特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 3969-3975.
[11] 骆 晗,李荣建,刘军定,霍旭挺,张 真,孙 萍,. 基于联合强度的黄土主动土压力公式与计算比较[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2080-2086.
[12] 崔 猛,韩尚宇,洪宝宁,. 新型土工单轴拉伸试验装置的研制及应用[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1832-1840.
[13] 贾 珺,肖本林,柯长仁. 基于虚内键模型的三维均质岩石本构关系模拟[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 740-746.
[14] 郭 翔,王学滨,白雪元,王春伟,齐大雷,. 加载方式及抗拉强度对巴西圆盘试验影响的连续-非连续方法数值模拟[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 214-220.
[15] 许 雷,刘斯宏,鲁 洋,宋迎俊,杨 齐. 冻融循环下膨胀土物理力学特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 167-174.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 颜天佑,李同春,赵兰浩,季薇薇. 三维边坡稳定分析的有限元弹塑性迭代解法[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3102 -3108 .
[2] 关伶俐,田洪铭,陈卫忠. 煤岩力学特性及其工程应用研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3715 -3719 .
[3] 董 捷,张永兴,吴曙光,陈 云. 切方边坡悬臂桩桩间土稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3881 -3888 .
[4] 薛新华,张我华. 双标量损伤模型及其在Biot固结有限元中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 20 -26 .
[5] 谢 强,余贤斌,Carlos Dinis da Gama. 时间延迟对劈裂试验条件下岩石凯塞效应的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 46 -50 .
[6] 樊恒辉,孔令伟,李洪良,卢雪清,尹培杰. 马家树水库大坝防渗土料分散性判别和改性试验[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 193 -198 .
[7] 田 威,党发宁,丁卫华,梁昕宇,陈厚群. 适于CT试验的动态加载设备研制及其应用[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 309 -313 .
[8] 李 强,杨 庆,栾茂田,贾景超. 曲线翼型裂纹扩展路径理论分析及试验验证[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 345 -349 .
[9] 王明年,陈炜韬,刘大刚,童建军. 公路隧道岩质和土质围岩统一亚级分级标准研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 547 -552 .
[10] 刘东燕,孙海涛,张 艳. 采动影响下采区上覆岩层层间剪切滑移模型分析[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 609 -614 .