›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 2195-2203.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于稳健模拟退火-单纯形混合算法的微震定位研究

吕进国1, 2,姜耀东2, 3,赵毅鑫2, 3,祝 捷3,王 欣3,陶 磊3   

  1. 1.中国矿业大学(北京) 资源与安全工程学院,北京 100083;2.中国矿业大学(北京) 煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点试验室,北京 100083; 3.中国矿业大学(北京) 力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-01 出版日期:2013-08-12 发布日期:2013-08-13
  • 作者简介:吕进国,男,1984年生,博士研究生,从事矿山动力灾害与防治方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目资助(No. 2010CB226801);国家自然科学基金资助(No. 50704034);教育部新世纪优秀人才计划项目资助(No. NCET-10-0775);中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助(No. 2010YL10)。

Study of microseismic positioning based on steady simulated annealing-simplex hybrid algorithm

LÜ Jin-guo1, 2, JIANG Yao-dong2, 3, ZHAO Yi-xin2, 3, ZHU Jie3, WANG Xin3, TAO Lei3   

  1. 1. Faculty of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 2. State Key Lab. of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 3. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2012-06-01 Online:2013-08-12 Published:2013-08-13

摘要: 为提高矿井微震的定位精度,通过模拟试验对比分析常规定位及新方法在定位求解中的适用范围及优缺点,研究反演未知变量数目、检波器的密度、波速等对各自定位方法的影响。基于单纯形法的优点,并结合模拟退火法的全局收敛性,提出采用稳健的模拟退火-单纯形法进行微震定位。研究发现,该方法不必直接搜索发震时刻,只需通过稳健方法预先估算,利用较少的检波器就可进行微震定位,且基本不受初始波速影响,从而大大减少搜索步数,有效地提高定位精度及收敛速度。以柿竹园矿人工爆破定位测试试验为例,重点分析比较模拟退火-单纯形法、稳健模拟退火-单纯形法及其他定位方法的空间绝对距离及目标函数误差,认为检波器数量较多且可获得理想的P波信息时,应用非线性最小二乘法能求出可信的结果;其余定位方法的三维定位误差及目标函数误差相差不大,但稳健模拟退火-单纯形法目标函数误差最小,稳定性最高,可在矿井微震定位中推广使用。

关键词: 微震, 三维定位, 非线性最小二乘, 单纯形, 模拟退火, 稳健估计

Abstract: To improve the accuracy of microseismic source location, the application scope, the advantages and disadvantages of traditional and improvement algorithms in locating solving were comparatively analyzed based on the simulation experiment. The influence of unknown variables, sensors’ density and P wave velocity on the location algorithms were studied respectively. Based on the advantages of the simplex and the global convergence characteristics of the simulated annealing, it was proposed that taking the steady simulated annealing-simplex algorithm located the microseism. The study shows that this algorithm is a simple estimation in advance by steady arithmetic without directly searching for the seismogenic moment. The searching steps can be greatly reduced and the location accuracy and convergence velocity can be improved. So the microseismic focus can be effectively located with less sensors without being affected by the initial velocity. Taking the artificial blasting location test experiment of a mine as an example, the errors of both the location accuracy and objective function for the simulated annealing-simplex, the steady simulated annealing-simplex and the other algorithms were specially analyzed. It is widely believed that applying the nonlinear least square algorithm can get reliable results when there are more sensors and better information of P wave. The errors of three-dimensional location and objective function of the other location algorithms are basically the same. But the objective function error of the steady simulated annealing-simplex algorithm is the minimum; and the stability is the best. So this algorithm with higher reliability and stability has obvious advantages; and it can be widely used for the microseismic location in mines.

Key words: microseisms, three-dimensional locating, nonlinear least square, simplex, simulated annealing, steady estimation

中图分类号: 

  • TD 324
[1] 陈炳瑞, 吴昊, 池秀文, 刘辉, 伍梦蝶, 晏俊伟, . 基于STA/LTA岩石破裂微震信号实时识 别算法及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3689-3696.
[2] 蒋若辰, 徐奴文, 戴峰, 周家文. 基于快速行进迎风线性插值的微震定位算法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3697-3708.
[3] 李桐, 冯夏庭, 王睿, 肖亚勋, 王勇, 丰光亮, 姚志宾, 牛文静, . 深埋隧道岩爆位置偏转及其微震活动特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2847-2854.
[4] 雷文杰, 李金雨, 云美厚, . 采动微地震波传播与衰减特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1491-1497.
[5] 郭 超, 高永涛, 吴顺川, 成子桥, 张诗淮, 韩龙强, . 基于三维快速扫描算法与到时差数据库技术的层状介质震源定位方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1229-1238.
[6] 李成武, 付 帅, 解北京, 李光耀, 宛天宇. 煤体静载破坏中低频磁场变化特征及产生机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 481-488.
[7] 王剑锋, 李天斌, 马春驰, 张航, 韩瑀萱, 周雄华, 姜宇鹏, . 基于引力搜索法的隧道围岩微震定位研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4421-4428.
[8] 蒋 雄, 徐奴文, 周 钟, 侯东奇, 李 昂, 张 敏, . 两河口水电站母线洞开挖过程围岩破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 305-314.
[9] 赵金帅,冯夏庭,王鹏飞,江 权,陈炳瑞,周扬一,裴书锋, . 爆破开挖诱发的地下交叉洞室微震特性及破裂机制分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2563-2573.
[10] 杨 莹,徐奴文,李 韬,戴 峰,樊义林,徐 剑,李 彪,. 基于RFPA3D和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2193-2202.
[11] 马春驰,李天斌,张 航,王剑锋, . 基于EMS微震参数的岩爆预警方法及探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 765-774.
[12] 胡中华,徐奴文,戴 峰,顾功开,李 昂,杨 莹,. 乌东德水电站地下厂房层状岩体稳定性及变形机制[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3794-3802.
[13] 吴顺川,陈子健,张诗淮,徐淼斐,白添羊,. 缓倾地层微震定位算法探讨及其数值验证[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 297-307.
[14] 孙运江,左建平,李玉宝,刘存辉,李彦红,史 月,. 邢东矿深部带压开采导水裂隙带微震监测及突水机制分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2335-2342.
[15] 徐奴文,李 韬,戴 峰,李 彪,樊义林,徐 剑,. 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸岩质边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2358-2367.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 卢 正,姚海林,骆行文,胡梦玲. 公路交通荷载作用下分层地基的三维动响应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2965 -2970 .
[2] 孙文静,孙德安,孟德林. 饱和膨润土及其与砂混合物的压缩变形特性[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3249 -3255 .
[3] 王 伟,李兴照. 竖向荷载下刚性板桩筏基础分析方法[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3441 -3446 .
[4] 兰四清,王玉林,谢康和. 径向双侧壁排水软土地基固结数学模型及解析解[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3871 -3875 .
[5] 邵生俊,郑 文,王正泓,王 帅. 黄土的构度指标及其试验确定方法[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 15 -19 .
[6] 魏 丽,柴寿喜,蔡宏洲,王晓燕,李 敏,石 茜. 麦秸秆加筋材料抗拉性能的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 128 -132 .
[7] 谢桂华,张家生,尹志政. 基于随机介质理论的采水地面变形时空分布[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 282 -286 .
[8] 杨锡鎏,周翠英. 基于ANSYS与OpenGL的高速公路结构物仿真建模及三维地层地表修剪方法[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 571 -576 .
[9] 赵延林,王卫军,曹 平,王 军,赵阳升. 不连续面在双重介质热-水-力三维耦合分析中的有限元数值实现[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 638 -644 .
[10] 付 伟,汪 稔. 饱和粉质黏土反复冻融电阻率及变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 769 -774 .