›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 2287-2294.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

锦屏二级水电站大理岩复杂加卸载应力路径力学特性研究

刘立鹏1,汪小刚1,贾志欣1,段庆伟1,张 磊2   

  1. 1.中国水利水电科学研究院 岩土工程研究所,北京 100048;2.北京科技大学 金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-28 出版日期:2013-08-12 发布日期:2013-08-13
  • 作者简介:刘立鹏,男,1983年生,博士,工程师,主要从事地下洞室及结构工程稳定性方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)资助(No. 2011CB013502);国家自然科学基金资助(No. 51179210,No. 51179210);中国水利水电科学研究院流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室自主研究课题资助项目(No. 2013ZY05

Experiment study of marble mechanical properties of Jinping II hydropower station under complex loading and unloading conditions

LIU Li-peng1, WANG Xiao-gang1, JIA Zhi-xin1, DUAN Qing-wei1, ZHANG Lei2   

  1. 1.Department of Geotechnical Engineering,China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research,Beijing 100048,China;2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for High Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2012-05-28 Online:2013-08-12 Published:2013-08-13

摘要: 地下洞室开挖围岩经历典型径向卸载、环向加载应力路径,由此引起的岩体强度、变形特征和破坏机制也不尽相同。针对锦屏二级水电站高地应力赋存环境,对施工排水洞大理岩开展常规单轴全应变、三轴压缩、卸围压、卸围压-加载轴压等4种不同应力路径力学试验,得到应力-应变全过程曲线、变形破坏特征和极限储能变化规律。试验研究结果表明, (1)锦屏二级水电站大理岩破坏时轴向应变一般较小,为硬脆性材料,卸荷应力路径下该脆性特征更为明显;(2)卸围压同时加载轴压试验峰值强度对应轴向应变、环向应变及体积应变值一般高于单纯的卸围压值,而对应峰值强度则一般低于卸围压值;(3)卸荷速率较大时,变形模量越大,大理岩峰值强度越低。加载速率越大,变形模量越小,峰值强度越高。初始围压越高,变形模量值越低,峰值强度越高;(4)无侧限作用时试件主要为张拉破坏,低侧限作用时为剪切破坏为主,局部存在张拉破坏,较高侧限时,剪切面为典型X或Y型;(5)岩石试件具有极限储能值,该值受多种因素的影响。一般情况下试件破坏对应围压越高,极限储能值越高,卸载速率越大,极限储能值越小。研究结果对于岩爆孕育发生机制解释以及工程实际问题的解决均有参考价值。

关键词: 锦屏二级水电站大理岩, 卸围压-加载轴压全过程试验, 极限储能

Abstract: Rock mass surrounding the excavation also under the complex radial unloading and ring direction loading stress path due to the excavation, for which results in difference from that of rock mass strength,deformation property and failure mechanism. Aiming to the high in-situ stress characteristics of Jinping II hydropower station, four different stress paths are chosen as test schemes corresponding as the uniaxial compressive test, triaxial compressive test, unloading triaxial test and unloading confining – loading axial pressure full test under high stress conditions are carried out on the marble specimens from the drainage tunnel. The complete stress-strain curve,deformation properties,failure characteristics and limited energy storage are obtained under respective stress path. Some instructive conclusions are drawn from tests as follows: (1) The failure axial strain is generally small. Jinping marble is hard and brittle which more apparent under unloading conditions. (2) The axial strain, circumferential strain and volumetric strain value unloading confining – loading axial pressure full tests are generally higher in the unloading tests, peak strength conversely. (3) The deformation modulus is large and the peak strength is lower with larger unloading rate, the deformation modulus is lower and the peak strength is large with larger loading rate, the deformation modulus is lower and the peak strength is large with larger initial confining pressure. (4) The principally failure model is tension without confining pressure; shear failure and locally tensile failure with lower confining pressure; while shear failure shape is X or Y with higher confining pressure. (5) The rock specimens have the limited value of energy storage, which can be effected by various factors. Limited energy storage is large with high confining pressure and is lower with higher unloading stress rate. The results can offer valuable references in explaining the mechanism of rockbutst and solving underground rock engineering problems.

Key words: Jinping II hydropower station marble, unloading confining-loading axial pressure full test, limited energy storage

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 杨艳霜,周 辉,张传庆,张 凯,晏 飞. 大理岩单轴压缩时滞性破坏的试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2714-2720.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 卢 正,姚海林,骆行文,胡梦玲. 公路交通荷载作用下分层地基的三维动响应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2965 -2970 .
[2] 孙文静,孙德安,孟德林. 饱和膨润土及其与砂混合物的压缩变形特性[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3249 -3255 .
[3] 王 伟,李兴照. 竖向荷载下刚性板桩筏基础分析方法[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3441 -3446 .
[4] 兰四清,王玉林,谢康和. 径向双侧壁排水软土地基固结数学模型及解析解[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3871 -3875 .
[5] 魏 丽,柴寿喜,蔡宏洲,王晓燕,李 敏,石 茜. 麦秸秆加筋材料抗拉性能的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 128 -132 .
[6] 谢桂华,张家生,尹志政. 基于随机介质理论的采水地面变形时空分布[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 282 -286 .
[7] 黄庆享,张 沛,董爱菊. 浅埋煤层地表厚砂土层“拱梁”结构模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2722 -2726 .
[8] 杨锡鎏,周翠英. 基于ANSYS与OpenGL的高速公路结构物仿真建模及三维地层地表修剪方法[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 571 -576 .
[9] 赵延林,王卫军,曹 平,王 军,赵阳升. 不连续面在双重介质热-水-力三维耦合分析中的有限元数值实现[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 638 -644 .
[10] 徐 冲,刘保国,刘开云,郭佳奇. 基于组合核函数的高斯过程边坡角智能设计[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 821 -826 .