›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 2295-2302.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

超细全尾砂材料胶凝成岩机理试验

徐文彬1, 2,杜建华1,宋卫东1,陈海燕1   

  1. 1.北京科技大学 金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点试验室,北京 100083;2.中国矿业大学(北京) 资源与安全工程学院,北京,100083
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-15 出版日期:2013-08-12 发布日期:2013-08-13
  • 通讯作者: 杜建华,男,1979年生,博士,主要从事岩石力学及采动灾害方面研究。E-mail: magicdna@163.com E-mail:xuwb08@163.com
  • 作者简介:徐文彬,男,1985年生,博士,讲师,主要从事充填工艺与理论以及新型胶结充填材料方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助(No. FRF-SD-12-003A);长江学者和创新团队发展计划资助(No. IRT0950)。

Experiment on the mechanism of consolidating backfill body of extra-fine grain unclassified tailings and cementitious materials

XU Wen-bin1, 2, DU Jian-hua1, SONG Wei-dong1, CHENG Hai-yan1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of High-Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines of Education Ministry, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. China University of Mining &Technology, Beijing, Faculty of Resources & Safety Engineering, Beijing, 100083, China
  • Received:2012-06-15 Online:2013-08-12 Published:2013-08-13

摘要: 矿山充填是保护土地资源、生态环境,实现矿山无废开采和消除重大安全隐患的理想途径。以某矿全尾砂为试验材料,在分析该矿全尾砂材料的化学成分、粒径级配组成等基本物理、化学特性基础上,借助XRD能谱分析和电镜扫描(SEM)方法,得到不同条件下的超细全尾砂材料胶凝成岩微观规律。对比以水泥、固结剂1#和固结剂2#分别为胶结剂时充填体的强度结果表明,在灰砂配比、浓度和龄期相同的条件下3种胶结材料充填体的强度大小为:固结剂1#>固结剂2#>水泥;固结剂1#可替代水泥作为矿山全尾砂胶结充填的胶结剂,且价格比水泥便宜,有利于降低矿山充填成本。对不同条件下的充填体强度曲线进行拟合,得到充填体的单轴抗压强度增长规律:在养护龄期28 d之内,充填体单轴抗压强度增长规律随龄期变化基本相同,皆遵循指数函数曲线增长规律;当以固结剂1#、2#分别作为胶结材料时,强度增长规律与水泥为胶结剂时相同;强度增长曲线趋势与灰砂配比、料浆浓度以及养护龄期正相关。

关键词: 全尾砂, 微观机制, 新型胶结剂, 强度规律

Abstract: Mine backfill is an ideal approach to protect land resources, ecological environment, to achieve the mine mode of no-waste-discharged and eliminate the potential hazards. The unclassified tailings from a mine was used as experimental raw material, then the micro-mechanism of consolidating backfill body of super-fineness unclassified tailings and cementitious materials under different conditions by means of XRD and SEM were obtained after analyzing the physical and chemical properties, the chemical components and particle size composition of the unclassified tailings. The cementing agent type #1 and type #2 were taken to replace the regular cement and the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of backfill specimens were gained. The experimental results showed that the influence degrees of different cementing agents on the behaviors of UCS were different, when the external experimental conditions were same; and it almost obeyed the law: cementing agent type #1>cementing agent type #2>cement. The study also demonstrated that the performance of the cementing agent type #1 were better than the others; and its price was cheaper; therefore, it can reduce the cost of mine backfill. The increasing curves of UCS of backfill samples at different curing times were obtained and it showed that the increasing laws of UCS at different curing conditions were unanimous, in accordance with the exponential function growth curve, although the cementing agents type were different. The cement-sand ratio, slurry concentration and curing time exhibit a positive correlation with the UCS growth curve.

Key words: unclassified tailings, micromechanism, new cementing agent, strength rule

中图分类号: 

  • TU 44
[1] 丁长栋, 张杨, 杨向同, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, . 致密砂岩高围压和高孔隙水压下渗透率 演化规律及微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3300-3308.
[2] 王东星, 肖杰, 李丽华, 肖衡林, . 基于碳化-固化技术的武汉东湖淤泥 耐久性演变微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3045-3053.
[3] 王东星, 肖 杰, 肖衡林, 马 强, . 武汉东湖淤泥碳化-固化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1805-1812.
[4] 查甫生, 刘晶晶, 许龙, 邓永锋, 杨成斌, 储诚富, . 水泥−粉煤灰固化/稳定重金属污染土的电阻率 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4573-4580.
[5] 刘松玉,曹菁菁,蔡光华, . 活性氧化镁碳化固化粉质黏土微观机制[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1543-1552.
[6] 蒋明镜,周 卫,刘静德,李 涛, . 基于微观力学机制的各向异性结构性砂土的本构模型研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3347-3355.
[7] 廖晓兰 ,杨久俊 ,张 磊 ,张宝莲 ,梁 超,. 丙烯酰胺聚合固化盐渍土试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2216-2222.
[8] 万 勇 ,薛 强 ,吴 彦 ,赵立业,. 干湿循环作用下压实黏土力学特性与微观机制研究[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2815-2824.
[9] 戴北冰 ,徐 锴 ,杨 峻 ,谭国焕 ,邓蕴桥 ,黄景昌,. 基于生物酶的固土技术在香港的应用研究[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1735-1742.
[10] 左清军 ,吴 立 ,袁 青 ,陆中玏 ,李 波,. 软板岩膨胀特性试验及微观机制分析[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 986-990.
[11] 王媛媛 ,孙 强 ,薛 雷 ,胡 凡,. 岩石脆性临界破坏的波速特征分析[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 529-535.
[12] 陈昌禄 ,邵生俊 ,张 喆 . 人工制备结构性黄土的真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2231-2238.
[13] 韩高孝,宫全美,周顺华. 摩擦型岩土材料土拱效应微观机制颗粒流模拟分析[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1791-1798.
[14] 孙 伟 ,吴爱祥 ,王洪江 ,周 喻 ,熊有为 ,仪海豹,. 全尾砂-废石混合回填膏体流动特性变化规律[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3464-3470.
[15] 崔 凯 ,谌文武 ,王旭东 ,韩文峰 ,朱彦鹏. 干旱区土遗址盐渍带风蚀损耗效应微观机制研究[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1167-1172.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吕海波,曾召田,赵艳林,卢 浩. 膨胀土强度干湿循环试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3797 -3802 .
[2] 熊田芳,邵生俊,王天明,高志宏. 西安地铁正交地裂缝隧道的模型试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 179 -186 .
[3] 王义锋,章 青. 基于界面元法的向家坝重力坝深层抗滑稳定分析[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2691 -2696 .
[4] 崔 凯,谌文武,张景科,韩文峰,梁收运. 多元层状边坡土体风蚀速率与微结构参数关系[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2741 -2746 .
[5] 张虎元,冯 蕾,吴军荣,王 宝,刘 平. 填埋场防渗衬垫等效替代研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2759 -2762 .
[6] 徐 超,黄 亮,邢皓枫. 水泥-膨润土泥浆配比对防渗墙渗透性能的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 422 -426 .
[7] 艾传志,王芝银. 既有路基下浅埋隧道开挖引起地层的位移及应力解析解[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 541 -546 .
[8] 丁 瑜,王全才,何思明. 拉力分散型锚索锚固段荷载传递机制[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 599 -603 .
[9] 金长宇,冯夏庭,张春生. 白鹤滩水电站初始地应力场研究分析[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 845 -850 .
[10] 谈云志,孔令伟,郭爱国,冯 欣,万 智. 红黏土路基填筑压实度控制指标探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 851 -855 .