郯庐断裂带山东段深孔地应力测量及其现今活动性分析

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 2329-2336.

郯庐断裂带山东段深孔地应力测量及其现今活动性分析

张鹏^{1, 2}，秦向辉^{1, 2}，丰成君^{1, 2}，孙炜锋^{1, 2}，谭成轩^{1, 2}

1.中国地质科学院国土资源部新构造运动与地质灾害重点实验室，北京 100081；2.中国地质科学院地质力学研究所，北京 100081

收稿日期:2012-05-24 出版日期:2013-08-12 发布日期:2013-08-13
作者简介:张鹏，男，1986年生，硕士，研究实习员，主要从事为地应力测量与监测、岩石力学、构造应力场等方面的研究。
基金资助:
中国地质调查局项目“北京地区主要活动断裂工程地质稳定性评价与地应力测量”资助（No. 1212011120070）；国土资源部公益行业专项项目“我国东部沿海核电站区域地壳稳定性与地质灾害研究”资助（No. 201211096）

In-situ stress measurement of deep borehole in Shandong segment of Tan-Lu fracture belt and analysis of its activity

ZHANG Peng^{1, 2}, QIN Xiang-hui^{1, 2}, FENG Cheng-jun^{1, 2}, SUN Wei-feng^{1, 2}, TAN Cheng-xuan^{1, 2}

1. Key Laboratory of Neotectonic Movement & Geohazard, Ministry of Land and Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2012-05-24 Online:2013-08-12 Published:2013-08-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 已有的地表调查和GPS位移测量、深部震源机制等研究结果表明，郯庐断裂山东段现今活动性表现为顺时针压扭性活动特征。为揭示郯庐（郯城－庐江）断裂带山东段地表和深部之间地壳浅表层日本大地震发生后的现今地应力状态和活动特征，在鲁东北部花岗岩地区开展了600 m的钻探工程与地应力测量工作。钻探岩芯编录初步揭示地壳浅表层岩体结构特征，随深度系统的地应力测量结果表明，现今水平主应力起主导作用，易于断层走滑作用发生，且现今最大水平主应力方向为近东西向，反映出郯庐断裂带山东段现今活动特征为压性兼右旋走滑，与地表和深部已有研究成果相吻合。研究成果为郯庐断裂带山东段现今活动性研究补充了新的资料。

关键词: 郯庐断裂带, 水压致裂, 地应力测量, 库仑准则, 走滑断层

Abstract: Analysis of earth surface displacement using GPS and deep focal mechanism show that present activity in the Shandong segment of Tan-Lu (Tancheng-Lujiang) fracture zone exhibit a clockwise compression-torsion characteristics in between the shallow earth crust and deep zone of the region after the 2008 Japan earthquake. Data was gathered from 25 in-situ stress sensors installed at varying intervals along the total depth of single 600 m borehole located inside a granite rich region at the northeast part of Shandong. Combined with in-situ stress data, core sampling of the structural features of shallow earth crust rock formations reveals that current horizontal principal stresses play a leading role in strike-slip fault activity. Moreover, measured maximum principle in-situ stress mechanics trend towards the east-west direction and reflects present compressive properties, with dextral slip activity, of the Shandong segment. Including pre-existing data of surface and subterranean experiments, this new data will allow us to open new research avenues for understanding the present active features of the Shandong segment of the Tan-Lu fracture belt.

Key words: Tan-Lu fracture belt, hydraulic fracturing, in-situ stress measurement, Coulomb criterion, strike-slip fault

中图分类号:

TV 554

张鹏，秦向辉，丰成君，孙炜锋，谭成轩 . 郯庐断裂带山东段深孔地应力测量及其现今活动性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2329-2336.

ZHANG Peng , QIN Xiang-hui , FENG Cheng-jun , SUN Wei-feng , TAN Cheng-xuan . In-situ stress measurement of deep borehole in Shandong segment of Tan-Lu fracture belt and analysis of its activity[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2329-2336.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王川婴, 王益腾, 韩增强, 汪进超, 邹先坚, 胡胜, . 基于钻孔形态分析的地应力测量方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 549-556.
[2]	张伟, 曲占庆, 郭天魁, 孙江. 热应力影响下干热岩水压致裂数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2001-2008.
[3]	张波, 李垚, 杨学英, 朱飘扬, 朱春帝, 刘子豪, 刘文杰, 罗志恒, . 一种用于水压致裂试验的水压供给装置研制及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2022-2028.
[4]	王璞, 王成虎, 杨汝华, 侯正阳, 王洪, . 基于应力多边形与震源机制解的深部岩体应力状态预测方法初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4486-4496.
[5]	蔡奇鹏，吴宏伟，胡平，陈星欣，李升才,. 跨越走滑断层黏土地层动力响应离心机试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2424-2432.
[6]	刘跃东，林健，冯彦军，司林坡，. 基于水压致裂法的岩石抗拉强度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1781-1788.
[7]	陈松，乔春生，叶青，邓斌. 基于摩尔-库仑准则的断续节理岩体复合损伤本构模型[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3612-3622.
[8]	钟山，江权，冯夏庭，刘继光，李邵军，邱士利，吴世勇，. 锦屏深部地下实验室初始地应力测量实践[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 356-366.
[9]	王成虎，邢博瑞，. 原生裂隙水压致裂原地应力测量的理论与实践新进展[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1289-1297.
[10]	王子娟，刘新荣，傅晏，张梁，袁文, . 两种pH水环境干、湿循环作用对泥质砂岩的侵蚀研究[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3231-3239.
[11]	廖明进，王全才，袁从华，汤华，张水华，. 基于楔形效应的隧道锚抗拔承载能力研究[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 185-192.
[12]	朱元广，刘泉声，蒋景东，薛俊华，. 三向压力盒的嵌入效应及其应力测量特性模拟[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2728-2736.
[13]	贾善坡，罗金泽，杨建平，高敏，龚俊，. 考虑围压影响的盐岩弹塑性损伤本构模型研究[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1549-1556.
[14]	赵颖，郭恩栋，刘智，高霖,. 走滑断层位错作用下城市地铁隧道损伤分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 467-473.
[15]	王海军，汤雷，任旭华，杨安玉，牛岩,. 低应力区岩石变形记忆效应形成机制及失忆性[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1007-1014.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed