双层竖井地基半透水边界固结分析

›› 2007, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 116-122.

双层竖井地基半透水边界固结分析

刘加才¹，施建勇²，赵维炳³，宰金珉¹

1.南京工业大学土木工程学院，南京 210009；2.河海大学岩土工程研究所，南京 210098；3.南京水利科学研究院，南京 210024

收稿日期:2005-04-22 出版日期:2007-01-10 发布日期:2013-08-28
作者简介:刘加才，男，1970年生，博士，讲师，主要从事软土地基特性及其地基处理方面的教学和科研。

Consolidation analysis of double-layered ground with impeded boundaries using vertical drains for soil improvement

LIU Jia-cai¹, SHI Jian-yong², ZHAO Wei-bing³, ZAI Jin-min¹

1. College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing 210009, China; 2. Reaserch Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 3. Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210024, China

Received:2005-04-22 Online:2007-01-10 Published:2013-08-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在现有双层竖井地基固结理论基础上，对双面半透水边界下的固结问题进行了研究，给出了相应的固结解答。将该解答编制成应用程序，对一算例进行了参数分析，以了解双层竖井地基半透水边界的固结特性。算例分析表明，半透水边界对竖井地基的固结影响较大：半透水参数(Rt，Rb)越大，则整个系统的孔压消散越快；半透水参数对与其相邻的土层的固结影响要比远离其边界的土层的固结影响大得多；按变形定义和按孔压定义的平均固结度两者的差别受半透水边界参数的影响。

关键词: 双层地基, 竖井, 半透水边界, 固结

Abstract: The consolidation problem of double-layered ground with impeded boundaries using vertical drains for soil improvement is studied based on the existing consolidation theory of double-layered ground with vertical drains. The corresponding solutions are presented and it is coded into a program. An engineering case is analyzed using the program and parametric studies are conducted to study the consolidation characteristics of the double-layered ground with impeded boundaries improved by vertical drains. The results lead to the following conclusions: The greater the values of impeded parameters (Rt and Rb) are, the faster the pore pressure of the system dissipate. Impeded parameters have greater influence on the stratum close to the impeded boundaries than that stratum far away from the impeded boundaries. The difference between the average consolidation defined by pore pressure and that defined by settlement is influenced by impeded parameters.

Key words: double-layered ground, vertical drains, impeded boundaries, consolidation

中图分类号:

TU 46+3

刘加才，施建勇，赵维炳，宰金珉. 双层竖井地基半透水边界固结分析[J]. , 2007, 28(1): 116-122.

LIU Jia-cai, SHI Jian-yong, ZHAO Wei-bing, ZAI Jin-min. Consolidation analysis of double-layered ground with impeded boundaries using vertical drains for soil improvement[J]. , 2007, 28(1): 116-122.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	刘忠玉, 崔鹏陆, 郑占垒, 夏洋洋, 张家超. 基于非牛顿指数渗流和分数阶Merchant模型的一维流变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2029-2038.
[2]	杨德欢, 颜荣涛, 韦昌富, 潘雪瑛, 张芹, . 饱和黏土平均粒间应力的确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2075-2084.
[3]	龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[4]	加瑞, 雷华阳, . 有明黏土各向异性固结特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2231-2238.
[5]	罗庆姿, 陈晓平, 袁炳祥, 冯德銮, . 柔性侧限条件下软土的变形特性及固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2264-2274.
[6]	蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周洋, 闫婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[7]	童立红, 王珏, 郭生根, 朱怀龙, 徐长节, . 变荷载下连续排水边界黏弹性地基一维固结性状分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1862-1868.
[8]	唐晓武, 杨晓秋, 俞悦. 开孔管桩复合地基排水固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1248-1254.
[9]	李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 考虑卸荷速率的K0固结膨胀土应力-应变行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1299-1306.
[10]	金丹丹, 王素, 李传勋. 考虑起始水力坡降的天然非均质地基固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1433-1440.
[11]	胡田飞, 刘建坤, 王天亮, 岳祖润, . 粉质黏土变形特性的冻融循环效应及其双屈服面本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 987-997.
[12]	郑黎明, 张洋洋, 李子丰, 马平华, 阳鑫军, . 低频波动下考虑孔隙度与压力不同程度变化的岩土固结渗流分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1158-1168.
[13]	郑栋, 黄劲松, 李典庆, . 基于多源信息融合的路堤沉降预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 709-719.
[14]	张磊, 刘慧, 王铁行. 固结与不固结条件下黄土-混凝土接触面剪切试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 238-244.
[15]	郑刚, 栗晴瀚, 哈达, 程雪松, . 天津市承压层应力状态及减压引发沉降规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 285-294.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed