矩形SMW工法工作井土体反力计算方法的研究

›› 2007, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 769-773.

矩形SMW工法工作井土体反力计算方法的研究

陈春来¹，魏纲¹，陈华辉²

1. 浙江大学城市学院土木工程系，杭州 310015；2. 湖州职业技术学院理工分院，湖州 313000

收稿日期:2005-05-11 出版日期:2007-04-10 发布日期:2013-09-05
作者简介:陈春来，男，1977年，讲师，主要从事地下隧道施工与工程管理研究。

Study on calculating methods of earth counterforce in rectangular working shaft by SMW methods

CHEN Chun-lai¹, WEI Gang¹, CHEN Hua-hui²

1. Department of Civil Engineering, City College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310015, China; 2. Faculty of Science and Engineering, Huzhou Vocational and Technological College, Huzhou 313000, China

Received:2005-05-11 Online:2007-04-10 Published:2013-09-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对采用型钢水泥土复合挡土墙(Soil Mixing Wall，SMW)建造的矩形工作井在顶力反力作用下的受力机理进行分析，假定承载后背竖向土体反力呈拟正态分布、水平向土体反力呈均匀分布，求得后背土体所能承受的最大土体反力计算公式。考虑前壁土体达到主动状态，得到工作井最大土体反力和允许顶力的计算公式。算例分析表明：采用梯形分布计算得到的后背最大土体反力值要略大于文中方法计算结果；在黏性土中，文中方法采用水土合算计算得到的允许顶力值与实测值较吻合。

关键词: 顶管, SMW工法, 工作井, 土体反力, 顶力

Abstract: The loading mechanism under the action of jacking counterforce of rectangular working shaft by soil mixing wall (SMW) methods is investigated. Assuming the horizontal earth counterforce distributed equably, vertical earth counterforce at the back of loaded wall is considered as quasi-normal distribution, a formula for calculating maximal earth counterforce at the back of loaded wall is obtained. Assuming the soil at the front of loaded wall is at active state, formulas for the maximal earth counterforce and permitted jacking force of working shaft are obtained. The analytical calculation results of an example show that the maximal earth counterforce at the back of loaded wall by trapezoidal distributing method is some greater than one with the method presented in text. The permitted jacking force calculated by estimating water and earth pressure together in cohesive soil is highly close to the maximal jacking force measured in field.

Key words: pipe jacking, soil mixing wall (SMW) methods, working shaft, earth counterforce, jacking force

中图分类号:

TU 431

陈春来，魏纲，陈华辉 . 矩形SMW工法工作井土体反力计算方法的研究[J]. , 2007, 28(4): 769-773.

CHEN Chun-lai , WEI Gang , CHEN Hua-hui . Study on calculating methods of earth counterforce in rectangular working shaft by SMW methods[J]. , 2007, 28(4): 769-773.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[2]	陈孝湘，张培勇，丁士君，唐自强,. 大口径三维曲线顶管顶力估算及实测分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 547-552.
[3]	张治国，张孟喜，王卫东,. 顶管推进引起施工场地竖向附加荷载分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 121-128.
[4]	刘念武，龚晓南，俞峰，房凯 , . 内支撑结构基坑的空间效应及影响因素分析[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2293-2298.
[5]	王双，夏才初，葛金科，. 考虑泥浆套不同形态的顶管管壁摩阻力计算公式[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 159-166.
[6]	景路，袁聚云，袁勇 . 顶管工程中的地层损失参数和土体变形计算[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 173-178.
[7]	杨仙，张可能，黎永索，彭环云，黄常波 . 深埋顶管顶力理论计算与实测分析[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 757-761.
[8]	李方楠，沈水龙，罗春泳. 考虑注浆压力的顶管施工引起土体变形计算方法[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 204-208.
[9]	黎永索，张可能，黄常波，李钟，邓美龙. 管幕预筑隧道地表沉降分析[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3701-3707.
[10]	诸以惇，陈卫忠，田洪铭，曹俊杰，耿亚梅，陈培帅. 考虑连续墙接头效应的软土大型盾构工作井稳定性分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2937-2943.
[11]	丁文其，袁森林，高小庆，谢东武. 电力隧道超大直径顶管施工扰动特性研究[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2901-2906.
[12]	魏丽敏，向远华，陈果元，胡海军. 顶管工程工作井位移与土抗力分析[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2397-2402.
[13]	魏纲，朱奎. 顶管施工对邻近地下管线的影响预测分析[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 825-831.
[14]	向安田，朱合华，丁文其. 顶管施工中顶力和平均摩阻力与顶程关系分析[J]. , 2008, 29(4): 1005-1009.
[15]	顾士坦，施建勇. 深基坑SMW工法模拟试验研究及工作机理分析[J]. , 2008, 29(4): 1121-1126.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed