矿渣胶凝材料固化软土的力学性状及机制

›› 2007, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (9): 1987-1991.

矿渣胶凝材料固化软土的力学性状及机制

张大捷¹，田晓峰¹，侯浩波¹，刘浩²，谭石康³

1.武汉大学资源与环境学院，武汉 430079; 2. 湖北交通规划设计院，武汉 430020; 3. 湖北随岳中高速公路指挥部，湖北天门 431700

收稿日期:2005-12-30 出版日期:2007-09-10 发布日期:2013-10-15
作者简介:张大捷，男，1978年生，博士研究生，主要从事软土加固材料的研究
基金资助:
湖北省交通厅重点科技项目（鄂交通科教2003（570））

Mechanical behavior and mechanism of stabilizing soft soil by slag cementitious material

ZHANG Da-jie¹, TIAN Xiao-feng¹, HOU Hao-bo¹, LIU Hao², TAN Shi-kang³

1. School of Resources and Environmental Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079,China; 2. Hubei Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institute, Wuhan 430020,China; 3. Hubei Suiyue Expressway Headquarters, Tianmen 441300,China

Received:2005-12-30 Online:2007-09-10 Published:2013-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用矿渣胶凝材料固化软土，既可利用工业废渣，又能减少水泥的用量。以矿渣胶凝材料固化黏土、砂土二种软土。发现矿渣胶凝材料加固软土的效果远好于水泥、石灰，其9 %掺量的固化土28 d的无侧限强度达到2.0 MPa以上，普遍高于15 %掺量的水泥固化土，且其28 d固化土的软化系数普遍高于90 %以上，固化黏土后CBR值远高于同掺量的石灰固化土。X衍射结构分析表明，矿渣胶凝材料水化时产生的高强难溶的矿物晶体是其固化软土效果好的主要原因。因此，矿渣胶凝材料是一种性能优异的软土加固材料。

关键词: 矿渣胶凝材料, 固化, 软土, 无侧限抗压强度, 水稳定性, 加洲承载比

Abstract: soft soil is stabilized by slag cementitious materials, which can not only reuse industrial wastes, but also reduce amount of cement. Sandy soil and clay soil are stabilized by slag cementitious materials. Result shows that the stabilization effect of alkali-slag cementitious materials is better than cement and lime. The unconfined compressive strength of soils added 9 % slag cementitious materials after curing 28 days reaches 2.0 MPa, which are higher than soils added 15 % cement; softening coefficient of stabilized soils after curing 28 days are almost higher than 90 %; the CBR of stabilized clay soil outclasses that of the lime-clay soil with the same mixing ratio. XRD analysis shows that the high-strength, insoluble mineral produced due to hydration of slag cementitous materials is the main cause for better effect of soil. All those show that alkali-slag cementitious material is an ideal solidifying agent for soil stabilization.

Key words: slag cementitious materials, stabilization, soft soil, unconfined compressive strength, water stability, CBR

中图分类号:

TU 411

张大捷，田晓峰，侯浩波，刘浩，谭石康 . 矿渣胶凝材料固化软土的力学性状及机制[J]. , 2007, 28(9): 1987-1991.

ZHANG Da-jie , TIAN Xiao-feng , HOU Hao-bo , LIU Hao , TAN Shi-kang . Mechanical behavior and mechanism of stabilizing soft soil by slag cementitious material[J]. , 2007, 28(9): 1987-1991.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[2]	张奎, 赵成刚, 李伟华. 海底软土层对海洋地基场地动力响应的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2456-2468.
[3]	蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周洋, 闫婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[4]	王东星, 肖杰, 肖衡林, 马强, . 武汉东湖淤泥碳化-固化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1805-1812.
[5]	张聪, 梁经纬, 阳军生, 曹磊, 谢亦朋, 张贵金, . 堤坝脉动注浆浆液扩散机制及应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1507-1514.
[6]	杨爱武, 潘亚轩, 曹宇, 尚英杰, 吴可龙, . 吹填软土低位真空预压室内试验及其数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 539-548.
[7]	吕擎峰, 周刚, 王生新, 霍振升, 马博, . 固化盐渍土核磁共振微观特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 245-249.
[8]	孙潇昊, 缪林昌, 吴林玉, 王呈呈, 陈润发. 低温条件下微生物诱导固化对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 224-230.
[9]	吴建涛, 叶霄, 李国维, 蒋超, 曹雪山, . 高路堤下PHC桩加固软土地基的承载及变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 351-358.
[10]	郭红仙, 周鼎. 软土中基坑土钉支护稳定性问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 398-404.
[11]	方祥位，李晶鑫，李捷，申春妮,. 珊瑚砂微生物固化体三轴压缩试验及损伤本构模型研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 1-8.
[12]	杨爱武，胡垚. 新型城市污泥固化土工程特性及微观机理[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 69-78.
[13]	陈瑞锋，田高源，米栋云，董晓强,. 赤泥改性黄土的基本工程性质研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 89-97.
[14]	汪益敏，闫岑，于恒，李奇. 静载作用下土工格栅加筋拓宽路堤土中应力特征试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 311-317.
[15]	宗钟凌，鲁先龙，李青松，. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed