›› 2007, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (10): 2046-2051.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

碎石土滑坡的因素敏感性计算分析

许建聪1,尚岳全2   

  1. 1.同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2.浙江大学 建筑工程学院,杭州 310027
  • 收稿日期:2005-10-08 出版日期:2007-10-10 发布日期:2013-10-15
  • 作者简介:许建聪,男,1967年生,博士后,主要从事岩土工程与工程地质、地下结构工程、防灾减灾工程及防护工程等方面的科研工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 40372118)

Sensitivity analysis of influencing factors of debris landslide

XU Jian-cong1, SHANG Yue-quan2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
  • Received:2005-10-08 Online:2007-10-10 Published:2013-10-15

摘要: 通过资料搜集整理和分析、现场工程地质调查与勘探和室内外的物理力学试验,采用弹塑性接触有限元强度折减法、不平衡推力法和数理统计分析法,结合工程实例,分析了影响碎石土滑坡各因素的敏感性,结果表明,按因素敏感度从大到小排列,主要影响碎石土滑坡稳定性的因素依次为滑面岩土体内摩擦角、地形坡度、滑体饱水面积比和滑面岩土体的内聚力。地形坡度大、具有低内摩擦角滑面的碎石土滑坡的整体稳定性较差,而连续降雨、强降雨会抬高地下水位增大滑体饱水面积比,降低滑面带岩土体抗剪强度,增加下滑力,对碎石土滑坡的稳定性将产生最不利的影响。同时,在对碎石土滑坡进行加固处理时,必须优先考虑采取提高滑面等效内摩擦角、降低地形坡度结合降低地下水位措施,其次考虑采取提高滑面岩土体内聚力的措施。

关键词: 碎石土滑坡, 弹塑性有限元, 接触算法, 不平衡推力法, 因素敏感性

Abstract: Connected with the engineering concrete example, through the collection, arrangement and analysis of related data, the site investigation and exploration of engineering geology, indoor and outdoor physico-mechanical tests, adopting the analytic means of mathematic statistics, unbalanced-thrust method and non-separation contact elastoplastic FEM together, the influencing factor sensitivity of debris landslide has been analyzed and researched. The results show as follows. First, through the sensitivity analysis of main factors to influence on the stability of debris landslide, its main influenced factors are internal friction angle of sliding surface, topographic grade, saturation-area ratio of slope-mass and cohesion of sliding surface by descending order of their sensitivity coefficients. Second, the integral stability coefficient of debris landslide with large topographic grade and the slip surface of small internal friction angle is more inferior. But steady rain and intensive rainfall can raise groundwater level, augment saturation-area ratio of slope-mass, lower the rock and soil shear strength of slip-surface, and increase downward sliding force, which will bring about the most disadvantage influence on the stability of a concrete debris landslide. Meanwhile, on reinforcing and treating the debris landslide, the measure raising equivalent angle of slip-surface internal friction and lowering topographic grade connected with lowering groundwater level must be taken the prior step, and may be thought over taking the next measure to increase the soil and rock cohesion of slip surface.

Key words: debris landslide, elastoplastic FEM, contact algorithm, unbalanced-thrust method, sensitivity of influencing factors

中图分类号: 

  • TU 431
[1] 潘卓夫,金亮星,陈文胜,. 边坡稳定性分析改进的径向移动算法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 2079-2084.
[2] 沈华章,张国发,王水林,郭明伟,葛修润,. 基于矢量分析方法的边坡下滑推力计算[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1096-1108.
[3] 陈志超 ,罗 旋 ,柳 侃 ,叶龙珍 ,左昌群,. 碎石土滑坡渗流系统特征及防治措施研究[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 813-818.
[4] 张建成 ,贾金青 ,涂兵雄 ,何慧荣,. 两种强度准则在Cosserat扩展模型弯曲变形中的应用[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 279-286.
[5] 刘汉龙,陶学俊,张建伟,陈育民. 水平荷载作用下PCC桩复合地基工作性状[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2716-2722.
[6] 李 湛,栾茂田. 土石坝拟静力抗震稳定分析的强度折减有限元法[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1503-1508.
[7] 许建聪,王余富. 水下隧道裂隙围岩渗流控制因素敏感性层次分析[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1719-1725.
[8] 方建瑞 ,许志雄 ,庄晓莹 . 三维边坡稳定弹塑性有限元分析与评价[J]. , 2008, 29(10): 2667-2672.
[9] 许建聪 ,尚岳全 . 降雨作用下碎石土滑坡解体变形破坏机制研究[J]. , 2008, 29(1): 106-112.
[10] 陈秀铜 ,李 璐,. 某水电站地下洞室群初始地应力场反演回归分析[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 540-544.
[11] 年廷凯 ,栾茂田 ,杨 庆 ,蒋景彩,. 基于强度折减弹塑性有限元法的抗滑桩加固边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 558-562.
[12] 陈益峰,周创兵,余志雄,张文杰,姜清辉. 锦屏一级左岸导流洞出口边坡开挖支护有限元模拟[J]. , 2007, 28(8): 1565-1570.
[13] 曾祥勇,邓安福. 锚索与锚杆联合锚固支护岩坡的有限元分析[J]. , 2007, 28(4): 790-794.
[14] 李 亮,迟世春,林 皋,褚雪松. 利用潘家铮极值原理与和声搜索算法进行土坡稳定分析[J]. , 2007, 28(1): 157-162.
[15] 年廷凯 ,栾茂田 ,王 栋 ,崔春义,. 基于ABAQUS的边坡稳定性强度折减有限元分析[J]. , 2006, 27(S2): 275-280.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 伟,李兴照. 竖向荷载下刚性板桩筏基础分析方法[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3441 -3446 .
[2] 兰四清,王玉林,谢康和. 径向双侧壁排水软土地基固结数学模型及解析解[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3871 -3875 .
[3] 黄庆享,张 沛,董爱菊. 浅埋煤层地表厚砂土层“拱梁”结构模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2722 -2726 .
[4] 孙德安,陈 波. 重塑超固结上海软土力学特性及弹塑性模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1739 -1743 .
[5] 赵明华,杨晶,杨明辉. 考虑桩土相互作用的变截面高墩自振频率计算分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2507 -2513 .
[6] 朱珍德,孙林柱,王明洋. 不同频率循环荷载作用下岩石阻尼比试验与变形破坏机制细观分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 8 -12 .
[7] 雷金波,陈从新. 基于双曲线模型的带帽刚性桩复合地基荷载传递机制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3385 -3391 .
[8] 龚成明,程谦恭,刘争平. 黄土边坡开挖与支护效应的离心模拟试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3481 -3486 .
[9] 丁光亚,蔡袁强,徐长节. 饱和土中刚性排桩对平面SV波的隔离分析[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 849 -854 .
[10] 黄 明,刘新荣,祝云华,钟祖良. 低频周期荷载下广义Kelvin-Voigt模型特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2300 -2304 .