条形荷载下黏性土主动土压力计算

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (S1): 167-172.

条形荷载下黏性土主动土压力计算

柯才桐，陈奕柏，高洪波，谢洪波

海南大学土木建筑工程学院，海口570228

收稿日期:2012-11-26 出版日期:2013-08-30 发布日期:2014-06-09
作者简介:柯才桐，男，1986生，硕士研究生，主要从事支挡结构、地基基础工程等岩土工程研究。
基金资助:
海南省自然科学基金资助(No.512116)

Calculation of active earth pressure for cohesive soil under action of strip surcharge

KE Cai-tong, CHEN Yi-bo, GAO Hong-bo, XIE Hong-bo

College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China

Received:2012-11-26 Online:2013-08-30 Published:2014-06-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 依据库仑土压力理论假设，挡土墙土压力由墙后填土在极限平衡状态下出现滑动楔体产生，推导出考虑滑裂面上填土的黏聚力、墙土间黏聚力、黏性土表面出现张拉裂缝、条形荷载下的黏性土主动土压力计算式，并给出临界破裂角的显式解答。当墙后作用有连续均布荷载或不考虑黏性填土表面出现裂缝时，只需取条形荷载到墙顶的距离或计算的裂缝深度为0即可按相同的方法求解。研究表明，由于未考虑条形荷载对临界破裂角的影响，规范方法得到土压力值偏小。该公式适用范围广，尤其对于条形荷载作用墙后任意位置时均可应用，对实际工程中挡土墙的设计计算具有一定应用价值。

关键词: 挡土墙, 主动土压力, 黏性土, 黏着力, 条形荷载

Abstract: Based on the Coulomb's earth pressure theory hypothesis that active earth pressure against the back of retaining wall is due to thrust force exerted by a sliding wedge of soil between the back of the wall and a plane which passes through the bottom edge of the wall and has an inclination of θ, a formula of active earth pressure is proposed, which considers the cohesion force on the sliding plane, the adhesive force between soil and the retaining wall, tension crack appears on the surface of cohesive soil, the strip surcharge; and the explicit solutions of critical rupture angle are given. When continuous uniform load acts on the back of the wall or without considering the situation that tension crack appears on the surface of cohesive soil, it can be solved by the same method with zeroing the distance from the strip surcharge to the coping and that the calculation of crack depth. Studies have shown that the calculation result of earth pressure based on specification is small, as the influence of strip surcharge on critical angle of rupture doesn’t count. The formula has a wide range of application, especially for the case that the strip surcharge acts on arbitrary position behind the wall. It has a certain practical value for the design and calculation of retaining wall in practical projects.

Key words: retaining wall, active earth pressure, cohesive soil, adhesive force, strip surcharge

中图分类号:

TU 442

柯才桐，陈奕柏，高洪波，谢洪波. 条形荷载下黏性土主动土压力计算[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 167-172.

KE Cai-tong, CHEN Yi-bo, GAO Hong-bo, XIE Hong-bo. Calculation of active earth pressure for cohesive soil under action of strip surcharge[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 167-172.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王龙, 朱俊高, 郭万里, 陆阳洋, . 无黏性土压缩模型及其验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 229-234.
[2]	陈建旭, 宋文武, . 平动模式下挡土墙非极限主动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[3]	刘忠玉, 崔鹏陆, 郑占垒, 夏洋洋, 张家超. 基于非牛顿指数渗流和分数阶Merchant模型的一维流变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2029-2038.
[4]	芮瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[5]	刘洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[6]	张晓曦, 何思明, 樊晓一, . L型挡土墙滑裂面确定方法与地震稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4011-4020.
[7]	刘美麟，侯艳娟，张顶立，房倩. 砂土地层中考虑基坑施工效应的柔性挡墙主动土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 149-158.
[8]	李兆华，胡杰，冯吉利，龚文俊. 基于黏弹塑性本构模型的泥石流数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 513-520.
[9]	杨山奇，卢坤林，史克宝，赵瀚天，陈一鸣，. 刚性挡土墙后三维被动滑裂面的模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3303-3312.
[10]	王学滨，张楠，潘一山，张博闻，杜亚志，. 单轴压缩黏性土剪切带相互作用及损伤试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1168-1175.
[11]	闫澍旺，李嘉，闫玥，陈浩，. 黏性土地基中竖向圆孔的极限稳定深度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1176-1181.
[12]	李泽，刘毅，周宇，王均星,. 基于混合离散的砌石挡土墙边坡极限承载力下限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108.
[13]	颜荣涛，纪文栋，陈星欣，张芹，韦昌富，. 盐溶液饱和黏土的力学行为模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 546-552.
[14]	闫澍旺，李嘉，闫玥，郎瑞卿，纪玉诚, . 轴对称主动土压力问题的滑移线解[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4133-4141.
[15]	高彦斌. 移动状态边界面法在黏性土不排水蠕变孔压分析中的应用[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4176-4182.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed