›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (S1): 179-186.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深埋软弱岩层钻孔围岩应变软化弹塑性分析

黄 磊1, 2, 3,卢义玉1, 2,夏彬伟1, 2,贾亚杰1, 2, 3,黄 飞1,2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室,重庆400030; 2. 重庆大学 复杂煤层气抽采国家与地方联合工程实验室, 重庆400030;3. 中国广东核电集团有限公司 中广核燃料有限公司,北京100029
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-18 出版日期:2013-08-30 发布日期:2014-06-09
  • 作者简介:黄磊,男,1987年生,硕士研究生,主要从事隧道与地下空间工程研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助(No.50704039,No.50921063);中央高校基本科研业务费科研专项自然科学类项目资助(No.CDJZR 10248801)

Elastoplastic analysis of surrounding rock of drilling with strain softening model in deep soft rock

HUANG Lei1, 2, 3,LU Yi-yu1, 2,XIA Bin-wei 1, 2,JIA Ya-jie 1, 2, 3,HUANG Fei1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China; 2. National & Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Gas Drainage in Complex Coal Seams, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China; 3. CGNPC Uranium Resources Co. Ltd., China Guangdong Nuclear Power Holding Co. Ltd., Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2012-09-18 Online:2013-08-30 Published:2014-06-09

摘要: 为解决在软弱岩层中钻孔易塌孔、成孔难的工程问题,认为岩体黏聚力沿塑性区呈线性弱化,得出应变软化条件下钻孔围岩二次应力、位移和塑性区分布表达式。利用FLAC3D内嵌FISH语言,自定义岩体黏聚力,对钻孔围岩弹塑性分布进行数值模拟分析。研究表明,理想弹塑性模型下的塑性区半径公式为文中解黏聚力co=cs时的特解;考虑黏聚力弱化特性后,相同地应力条件下塑性区半径显著扩大,为修正Fenner解的1.4倍,钻孔围岩最大切向应力位于距钻孔中心约2.9倍钻孔半径处,应力集中系数小于2。成果应用于四川某矿井钻孔工程,表明当加固半径约为3倍钻孔半径时,成孔率在90%以上,取得较好技术经济效果。

关键词: 软弱岩层, 钻孔塌孔, 黏聚力弱化, 弹塑性分析, 钻孔加固

Abstract: When drilling in soft and weak rock, the drilling is difficult to form and collapses frequently. To solve this engineering problem, based on the assumption that the rock cohesion weakens linearly along the plastic zone, the elastoplastic analysis of surrounding rock of drilling was completed and the secondary stress, displacement and plastic zone expressions of distribution are obtained. Gained self-defined rock mass cohesion by using FISH language that embedded in FLAC3D software. The numerical simulation analysis of elastoplastic distribution of rock around drilling was done. Compared to the original ideal M-C standards, the contrast results indicate that the theoretical calculation is correct. Theory and numerical simulation results show that: The plastic zone radius formula (e.g. fixed Fenner solution) that based on ideal elasticplastic model is a special solution when cohesion co equal to cs. After considering the cohesion weakening and residual cohesion, the plastic zone radius is 1.4 times as big as fixed Fenner solution. The numerical simulation shows that the maximum tangential stress in surrounding rock of drilling present to approximately 2.9 times drilling radius from drilling center; the stress concentration factor is less than 2. When under the same in-situ stress conditions, the plastic zone radius expand obviously after considering the cohesion weakening. Through analysis it is gained that the best drilling reinforcement radius is 3 times of the drilling radius; these achievements were applied to a drilling engineering of a certain coal mine in China.

Key words: soft rock, drilling collapse, cohesion weakening, elastoplastic analysis, drilling reinforcement

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 谷拴成,周 攀,黄荣宾. 锚杆–围岩承载结构支护下隧洞稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 122-130.
[2] 管华栋,周晓敏. 基于围岩相互作用的冻结壁弹塑性分析对比研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 649-655.
[3] 曹雪叶,赵均海,张常光. 基于统一强度理论的冻结壁弹塑性应力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 769-774.
[4] 谷拴成,丁 潇. 岩体离层对锚固体荷载影响的弹塑性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2649-2654.
[5] 张玉军. CO2注入岩体的热-气-应力耦合二维弹塑性有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 582-586.
[6] 张黎明,王在泉. 考虑岩体峰后非线性软化的衬砌压力隧洞应力解[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 283-287.
[7] 孙金山,卢文波. 非轴对称荷载下圆形隧洞围岩弹塑性分析解析解[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 327-332.
[8] 吴志敏,屠毓敏. 土钉基坑支护的空间效应研究[J]. , 2007, 28(10): 2178-2182.
[9] 王 成,林 胜. 岩体裂隙受内压力的弹塑性分析[J]. , 2006, 27(S2): 181-185.
[10] 马志涛 ,刘汉龙,. 现浇薄壁管桩水平受力特性三维弹塑性有限元分析[J]. , 2006, 27(S2): 860-864.
[11] 栾茂田 ,李 波,. 基于广义SMP破坏准则的柱形孔扩张问题理论分析[J]. , 2006, 27(12): 2105-2110.
[12] 张玉军. 热-水-应力耦合弹塑性二维有限元程序的开发与应用尝试[J]. , 2005, 26(2): 19-174.
[13] 朱合华 ,杨宝红 ,蔡永昌 ,徐 斌,. 无网格自然单元法在弹塑性分析中的应用[J]. , 2004, 25(4): 671-674.
[14] 张玉军 ,李治国,. 铁山隧道和大垭口隧道的平面弹塑性有限元分析[J]. , 2004, 25(12): 1969-1972.
[15] 葛修润;. 岩体中节理面、软弱夹层等的力学性质和模拟分析方法(一)[J]. , 1979, 1(1): 54-75.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[2] 梁桂兰,徐卫亚,谈小龙. 基于熵权的可拓理论在岩体质量评价中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 535 -540 .
[3] 马文涛. 基于灰色最小二乘支持向量机的边坡位移预测[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1670 -1674 .
[4] 于琳琳,徐学燕,邱明国,闫自利,李鹏飞. 冻融作用对饱和粉质黏土抗剪性能的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2448 -2452 .
[5] 王 伟,刘必灯,周正华,王玉石,赵纪生. 刚度和阻尼频率相关的等效线性化方法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3928 -3933 .
[6] 王海波,徐 明,宋二祥. 基于硬化土模型的小应变本构模型研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 39 -43 .
[7] 曹光栩,宋二祥,徐 明. 山区机场高填方地基工后沉降变形简化算法[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 1 -5 .
[8] 刘华丽 ,朱大勇 ,钱七虎 ,李宏伟. 边坡三维端部效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1905 -1909 .
[9] 刘年平 ,王宏图 ,袁志刚 ,刘竟成. 砂土液化预测的Fisher判别模型及应用[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 554 -557 .
[10] 王卫东 ,李永辉 ,吴江斌 . 超长灌注桩桩-土界面剪切模型及其有限元模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3818 -3824 .