›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (S1): 285-292.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

某大型堆积体边坡成因机制分析及治理措施研究

邓华锋,朱 敏,原先凡,马 莉,罗 骞,胡 鹏   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 三峡地区地质灾害与生态环境湖北省协同创新中心,湖北 宜昌 443002; 2. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2012-10-13 出版日期:2013-08-30 发布日期:2014-06-09
  • 作者简介:邓华锋,男,1979年生,博士,副教授,主要从岩土工程方面研究。
  • 基金资助:

    973计划前期研究专项课题资助(No.2012CB426502);湖北省自然科学基金资助(No.2012FFB03805);三峡大学科学基金资助(No.KJ2011B008);三峡大学硕士培优基金资助(No.2012PY011)。

Research on genetic mechanism and treatment method of some large-scale accumulation slope

DENG Hua-feng,ZHU Min,YUAN Xian-fan,MA Li,LUO Qian,HU Peng   

  1. 1. Collaborative Innovation Center for Geo-Hazards and Eco-Environment in Three Gorges Area of Hubei Province, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards in Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2012-10-13 Online:2013-08-30 Published:2014-06-09

摘要: 针对我国西南地区水电工程建设中经常遇到的堆积体边坡问题,以堆积体边坡的岩体结构特征及工程地质、环境条件为基础,结合现场踏勘在地表、平硐中看到的地质现象和钻孔岩芯资料,详细地分析了堆积体边坡的成因机制和演化过程,并恢复出其形成的概化地质模型。结果显示,堆积体边坡整体为崩塌堆积物,但在形成过程中堆积体一区中上部发生了较大方量的局部破坏,导致了堆积体一、二区地貌和内部结构的差异。对堆积体边坡的稳定性进行了宏观定性评价和详细计算分析,结果表明堆积体整体趋于稳定,但覆盖层浅、中部存在局部稳定性较差的区域。为保证工程的后期正常运营,在综合考虑工程、环境、经济等方面因素的基础上,对堆积体一区采取压脚的处理方式,二区采取削坡减载加挡土墙的处理方式。分析计算成果为工程设计提供了必需的指导和合理的依据,同时也可为类似工程的分析提供参考

关键词: 堆积体, 成因机制, 削坡减载, 挡土墙

Abstract: Aiming at the accumulation slope problem which is frequently encountered in the domestic southwest region hydropower project construction, the genetic mechanism and evolution process of accumulation slope was analyzed in detail on base of the piled rock mass characteristics, environmental conditions and engineering geology, and its formation. Generalized geological model has also been restored. Meanwhile, the research is also combined with the geological phenomena and drill core data gained from field displacement exploration. The results show that: the whole accumulation slope is a collapse accumulation, but in the process of formation, large-amount of local destruction occurred in district 1, resulting in geomorphology and internal structural differences between district 1 and district 2. At the same time, the macro-qualitative evaluation and detailed calculations of the stability analysis show that: the whole accumulation body tends to be stable, but the shallow overburden is quite, and in centre there are some local poor stability regions; in order to ensure the normal operation in later stage, and consider the engineering, environmental, and economic factors, foot presser was taken in district 1; cutting slope and retaining wall were taken in district 2. The calculation results can provide the necessary guidance and reasonable basis for the engineering design, and can also provide reference for the analysis of similar projects.

Key words: accumulation body, genetic mechanism, cutting slope and reducing load, retaining wall

中图分类号: 

  • TU 472
[1] 赵晓彦, 万宇豪, 张肖兵. 汶马高速公路千枚岩堆积体岩块定向性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 175-184.
[2] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[3] 何子露, 刘威, 何思明, 闫帅星, . 饱和松散堆积体快速滑动的剪胀效应 机制与过程模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2389-2396.
[4] 芮 瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈 成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙 主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[5] 谢亦朋, 杨秀竹, 阳军生, 张聪, 戴勇, 梁雄, 龚方浩, . 松散堆积体隧道围岩变形破坏细观特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4925-4934.
[6] 张晓曦, 何思明, 樊晓一, . L型挡土墙滑裂面确定方法与地震稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4011-4020.
[7] 李兆华,胡 杰,冯吉利,龚文俊. 基于黏弹塑性本构模型的泥石流数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 513-520.
[8] 杨山奇,卢坤林,史克宝,赵瀚天,陈一鸣,. 刚性挡土墙后三维被动滑裂面的模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3303-3312.
[9] 孙志亮,孔令伟,郭爱国. 不同含水状态堆积体边坡地震响应特性大型振动台模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2433-2441.
[10] 李 泽,刘 毅,周 宇,王均星,. 基于混合离散的砌石挡土墙边坡极限承载力下限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108.
[11] 陈祖煜,黎康平,李 旭,詹成明,. 重力式挡土墙抗滑稳定容许安全系数取值标准初探[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 1-10.
[12] 刘路路,宋 亮,焦玉勇,王 浩,张秀丽,谢壁婷, . 库水位波动条件下黄土坡临江1#崩滑堆积体稳定性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 359-366.
[13] 杨 贵,王阳阳,刘彦辰, . 基于曲线滑裂面的挡墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2182-2188.
[14] 梁敬轩,胡卸文,叶正晖,罗 刚,刁仁辉,马洪生,. 大型堆积体边坡基-覆界面及坡面动态响应特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2249-2260.
[15] 杜国梁,张永双,姚 鑫,郭长宝,杨志华|. 都江堰市五里坡高位滑坡-碎屑流成因机制分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 493-501.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘小文,常立君,胡小荣. 非饱和红土基质吸力与含水率及密度关系试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3302 -3306 .
[2] 黄建华,宋二祥. 大型锚碇基础围护工程冻结帷幕力学性态研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3372 -3378 .
[3] 王观石,李长洪,陈保君,李世海. 应力波在非线性结构面介质中的传播规律[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3747 -3752 .
[4] 王朝阳,许 强,倪万魁. 原状黄土CT试验中应力-应变关系的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 387 -391 .
[5] 万少石,年廷凯,蒋景彩,栾茂田. 边坡稳定强度折减有限元分析中的若干问题讨论[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2283 -2288 .
[6] 闫 铁,李 玮,毕雪亮. 基于分形方法的多孔介质有效应力模型研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2625 -2629 .
[7] 徐维生,柴军瑞,陈兴周,孙旭曙. 岩体裂隙网络非线性非立方渗流研究与应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 53 -57 .
[8] 赵尚毅,郑颖人,李安洪,邱文平,唐晓松,徐 俊. 多排埋入式抗滑桩在武隆县政府滑坡中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 160 -164 .
[9] 刘振平,贺怀建,朱发华. 基于钻孔数据的三维可视化快速建模技术的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 260 -266 .
[10] 赵跃堂,林家炜,石 磊. 冲击荷载作用下层裂问题研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 122 -126 .