锚固岩石边坡地震稳定性拟动力分析

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (S1): 293-300.

锚固岩石边坡地震稳定性拟动力分析

阮晓波¹，孙树林^{2, 3}，刘文亮³

1.河海大学土木与交通学院, 南京 210098；2.河海大学水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室，南京 210098； 3.河海大学地球科学与工程学院，南京，210098

收稿日期:2013-05-06 出版日期:2013-08-30 发布日期:2014-06-09
作者简介:阮晓波，男，1984年生，博士研究生，主要从事边坡工程及岩土地震工程等方面的研究工作

Seismic stability of anchored rock slope using pseudo-dynamic method

RUAN Xiao-bo¹，SUN Shu-lin^{2, 3}，LIU Wen-liang³

1. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 2.State Key Laboratory of Hydrology, Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 3.College of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China

Received:2013-05-06 Online:2013-08-30 Published:2014-06-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 地震易发地区的锚固岩石边坡，需要研究其地震稳定性。对于锚固典型岩石边坡，在考虑水平与竖向地震力、张裂缝积水深度、坡顶超载、锚索倾角、锚索位置、锚索拉力及静水与动水压力等的条件下，运用拟静力和拟动力方法分别推导了不同工况条件下其抗滑和抗倾覆地震安全系数。分析表明，竖向向上地震力有利于锚固岩石边坡的抗滑稳定，而竖向下的地震力有利于锚固岩石边坡的抗倾覆稳定；在相同工况条件下，当岩体放大系数等于1.0时，拟动力与拟静力方法所得锚固岩石边坡地震安全系数相差无几，但是，当岩体放大系数逐渐增大时，拟动力方法所得地震安全系数越来越明显地小于拟静力方法所得地震安全系数。因此，在抗震设计当中适当的考虑岩体放大系数，将会有利于锚固岩石边坡的安全设计。

关键词: 岩石边坡, 地震稳定性, 拟动力方法, 锚固, 动水压力

Abstract: In seismic prone areas, it is necessary to study seismic stability of anchored rock slope. For anchored typical rock slope, the seismic safety factor of anchored rock slope against sliding and overturning failures is deduced by pseudo-static method and pseudo-dynamic method, respectively, in the different working conditions, considering both horizontal and vertical seismic forces, depth of water in tension crack, surcharge, dip angle of rock bolt, rock bolt position, tension force of rock bolt, and both hydrostatic and hydrodynamic pressures. The conclusions can be drawn that the upward vertical seismic force is conducive to the stability of anchored rock slope against sliding failure; but the downward vertical seismic force is conducive to the stability of anchored rock slope against overturning failure; in the same working conditions, the pseudo-dynamic and pseudo-static safety factors are all the same as the amplification factor is equal to 1.0; but the pseudo-dynamic safety factor is more and more obvious less than the pseudo-static safety factor as the amplification factor gradually increases. In seismic design, it will be beneficial to the safety design of anchored rock slope by appropriately considering the amplification factor.

Key words: rock slope, seismic stability, pseudo-dynamic method, anchorage, hydrodynamic pressure

中图分类号:

TU457

阮晓波，孙树林，刘文亮 . 锚固岩石边坡地震稳定性拟动力分析[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 293-300.

RUAN Xiao-bo ，SUN Shu-lin ，LIU Wen-liang . Seismic stability of anchored rock slope using pseudo-dynamic method[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 293-300.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	蒋泽锋, 张戈, 朱大勇, 王军, . 锚固力作用下的边坡临界滑动场法研究与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2799-2806.
[2]	言志信, 龙哲, 屈文瑞, 张森, 江平, . 地震作用下含软弱层岩体边坡锚固界面剪切作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2882-2890.
[3]	崔凯, 黄井镜, 谌文武, 王东华, 韩宁, . 生石灰为掺料的土遗址锚固浆液选型和性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2183-2191.
[4]	吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[5]	张景科, 单婷婷, 王玉超, 王南, 樊孟, 赵林毅, . 土遗址锚固土体-浆体（CGN+C）界面力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 903-912.
[6]	马显春, 罗刚, 邓建辉, 上官力, . 陡倾滑面堆积层滑坡抗滑桩锚固深度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 157-168.
[7]	张玉芳，袁坤,. 双锚固段新型锚索锚固性能研究及工程应用[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 461-468.
[8]	吴曙光，付红梅，张岩岩，. 拉压分散型锚索锚固机制及工程应用研究[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2155-2163.
[9]	杨莹，徐奴文，李韬，戴峰，樊义林，徐剑，李彪，. 基于RFPA3D和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2193-2202.
[10]	周勇，王旭日，朱彦鹏，李京榜，蒋小奎,. 强风化软硬互层岩质高边坡监测与数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2249-2258.
[11]	付晓，冀文有，张建经，曹礼聪，范刚，. 锚索框架梁加固平面滑动型边坡地震动力响应[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1709-1719.
[12]	崔臻，盛谦，冷先伦，罗庆姿,. 地下洞室地震动力响应的岩体结构控制效应[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1811-1824.
[13]	赵象卓，张宏伟，CAO Chen，张明，张怀东，韩军, . 不同围岩条件下锚杆肋间距与锚固力优化研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1263-1270.
[14]	汪班桥，李楠，门玉明，张妙芝. 滑坡防治格构梁锚固系统振动台模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 782-788.
[15]	崔凯，王东华，谌文武，任晓峰，刘建，杨光，. 基于改性糯米灰浆的3种锚杆锚固性能对比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 498-506.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed