隧道挤压型变形与支护特性研究

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (S1): 413-418.

隧道挤压型变形与支护特性研究

刘志强，宋冶，胡元芳

中铁西南科学研究院有限公司，成都 611731

收稿日期:2012-10-10 出版日期:2013-08-30 发布日期:2014-06-09
作者简介:刘志强，男，1983年生，硕士，工程师，主要从事隧道及地下工程方面的研究
基金资助:
铁道部科技研究开发计划项目资助（No.2009G009-B-1）

Study of squeezing deformation and support characteristics of tunnels

LIU Zhi-qiang，SONG Ye，HU Yuan-fang

China Railway Southwest Research Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu 611731, China

Received:2012-10-10 Online:2013-08-30 Published:2014-06-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对挤压型大变形问题，通过木寨岭隧道科研试验与相关资料分析，得出挤压型大变形具有变形量大、持续时间长的特点，一般两侧为变形优势部位。测试数据表明，刚性支护中围岩压力、拱架应力、锚杆轴力值均较大，其中拱架应力值可能超过材料屈服强度，边墙锚杆较拱部锚杆作用明显，围岩压力与变形增量呈反比关系；在挤压型变形隧道中允许有控制性地释放围岩变形，能够减小支护结构上的围岩压力，有利于隧道结构的长期稳定。文中阐述了可让式支护原理，对可让式支护结构预留变形量进行初步预测，数值计算表明，采用刚性支护将位移控制在较小的范围内需要足够大的刚度，而可让式支护具有能够允许围岩一定程度的变形同时减小支护结构受力的优势，可在铁路隧道中推广使用。

关键词: 挤压变形, 软弱围岩, 高地应力, 可让式支护

Abstract: In light of the squeezing deformation problem, based on Muzhailing tunnel research and other relative data analysis, it is concluded that large value and long time deformation are the squeezing deformation characteristics, both sides are usually advantage location in the whole deformation of tunnel. Test data show that surrounding rock pressure, stress of steel arch centering, axial force of anchor have a larger value in rigid support, where stress of steel may exceed the yield strength of material; anchor is more effective on side walls than other position; surrounding rock pressure and deformation increment is inversely proportional. The results show that rock pressure can be reduced by control release of surrounding rock deformation, is beneficial to the long-term stability of the tunnel structure. Yielding support is proposed, and reserved deformation can be predicted preliminarily. Numerical calculation shows that large enough stiffness is required for rigid support to control displacement in a small range, Yielding support has advantages in control deformation and reduces stress of steel; it is a better control technology in squeezing deformation tunnels.

Key words: squeezing deformation, weak surrounding rock, high ground stress, yielding support

中图分类号:

U 451

刘志强，宋冶，胡元芳. 隧道挤压型变形与支护特性研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 413-418.

LIU Zhi-qiang，SONG Ye，HU Yuan-fang. Study of squeezing deformation and support characteristics of tunnels[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 413-418.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	陈卫忠, 田云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[2]	崔光耀, 祁家所, 王明胜, . 片理化玄武岩隧道围岩大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 231-237.
[3]	张建海，王仁坤，周钟，郑路，张茹，谢和平, . 高地应力地下厂房预应力锚索预紧系数[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1002-1008.
[4]	叶飞，宋京，唐勇三，林剑飞，贾涛，. 软弱围岩隧道掌子面及超前核心土挤出位移特征研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 323-330.
[5]	范勇，卢文波，周宜红，冷振东，严鹏，. 一种高地应力条件下爆破开挖诱发振动峰值的预测模型[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1082-1088.
[6]	梁宁，伍法权，王云峰，包含, . 大埋深高地应力关山隧道围岩变形破坏分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 329-336.
[7]	严鹏，赵振国，卢文波，陈明，周创兵 , . 深部岩体地应力瞬态卸载诱发振动效应的影响因素[J]. , 2016, 37(2): 545-553.
[8]	马腾飞，李树忱，李术才，徐咸辉，张露晨，平洋. 不同倾角多层节理深部岩体开挖变形破坏规律模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2899-2908.
[9]	陈菲，何川，邓建辉，. 高地应力定义及其定性定量判据[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 971-980.
[10]	杨栋，李海波，夏祥，罗超文. 高地应力条件下爆破开挖诱发围岩损伤的特性研究[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1110-1116.
[11]	杨栋，李海波，夏祥，罗超文，李卫兵，. 高地应力下隧道围岩动力损伤分析[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 311-317.
[12]	武伯弢，朱合华，徐前卫，明娟 . IV级软弱围岩相似材料的试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 109-116.
[13]	陈培帅，陈卫忠，庄严 . 基于断裂力学的岩爆破坏形迹两级预测方法研究[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 575-584.
[14]	陈国庆，李天斌，张岩，付开隆，王栋，. 花岗岩隧道脆性破坏的温度效应研究[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3513-3519.
[15]	李彦恒，谭可可，冯利. 基于岩饼几何形态测量的原地应力测定方法[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 224-0228.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed