›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (S1): 533-539.

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    

基于三维地质模型的排土场边坡整体稳定性探究

李 跃1, 2,杨永生1, 2,毛权生1, 2,唐 恺1   

  1. 1. 中钢集团马鞍山矿山研究院 岩土工程研究所,安徽 马鞍山 243000; 2. 中钢集团马鞍山矿山研究院 金属矿山安全与健康国家重点实验室,安徽 马鞍山 243000
  • 收稿日期:2013-02-28 出版日期:2013-08-30 发布日期:2014-06-09
  • 作者简介:李跃,男,1987年生,硕士,工程师,主要从事岩土体稳定性数值模拟及矿山边坡、尾矿库、排土场的设计研究工作

Researches on general stability for dump slope based on three-dimensional geologic model

LI Yue1,2,YANG Yong-sheng1,2,MAO Quan-sheng1,2,TANG Kai1   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Sinosteel Maanshan Institute of Mining Research, Maanshan, Anhui 243000, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Safety and Health for Metal Mine, Sinosteel Maanshan Institute of Mining Research, Maanshan, Anhui 243000,China
  • Received:2013-02-28 Online:2013-08-30 Published:2014-06-09

摘要: 目前所广泛采用的平面应变分析手段,针对排土场边坡稳定性评价时有时会出现某剖面安全系数高于设定允许值,实际中却遭破坏的现象,除了常被提及的力学参数、本构模型等因素,排土场凹形夹持效应和凸形发散作用突出以及滑体端部效应的影响,是分析结果不能准确反映实际的根本原因之一。鉴于此,从平面高程数据、地质剖面、钻孔资料等条件,配合插值效果较为稳定的Kriging法对空间数据进行插值,建立排土场三维地质整体模型。然后,采用自编FISH语言接口程序,将地质模型导入FLAC3D中离散化并计算,较为简单、有效地实现三维地质建模、模型可视化、岩土工程计算分析三位一体功能,有效地克服了平面分析无法解决的上述问题。以攀钢兰尖铁矿尖山第7排土场为实,对其整体稳定性进行应力、应变分析,采用三维强度折减法计算排土场三维整体安全系数,与现场调查及平面计算结果较为一致。基于该模型的计算结果可以有效避免排土场空间效应和滑体端部效应,得到的排土场全域应力-应变规律,对露天矿排土场的生产管理,具有一定的指导意义。

关键词: 排土场, 三维建模, 稳定性, 安全系数, Kriging插值, 露天矿

Abstract: The plane strain analysis method was widely adopted in evaluation of dump slope stability. It is embarrassed that, dumps sometimes destroyed but the safety factor was go over the allowable value. Regardless of those issues had been mentioned frequently, such as mechanical parameters, constitutive model and so on, the spatial clamp effect of convex and divergent effect of concave and slide-body-end effect are also play vital roles in analysis of slope stability. For those reasons, proceed from conditions of plane elevation data, geological section, drilling data and others, Kriging interpolation method, which can obtained a smooth effect of interpolation, was adopted, and then the three-dimensional(3D) geological model of dump was built. Then an interface program, wrote by FISH, was used to import the 3D-model into FLAC3D to discretization and calculation. In this way, the issues mentioned above can be figure out efficiently. Trinity function include 3D geological modeling, model visualization, geotechnical analysis was achieved in a simple and highly efficient way. An example of Jianshan seventh dump of Lanjian Iron Mine, Pangang Group co. Ltd. of China, was concerned by previous mean, 3D stress-strain analysis was carried out, 3D global safety factor was also calculated by 3D strength reduction method. It turned out that the results was accordant to the field investigation and plane strain analysis conclusion. Results calculated by the 3D geological model cannot be affected by dump spatial effect and slide-body-end effect, the general stress-strain pattern, which obtained from the method, can be instructive and meaningful to production management for open-mine dumps.

Key words: waste dump, 3D geological modeling, stability, safety factor, Kriging interpolation, open-mine

中图分类号: 

  • TD 164
[1] 朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡 设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[2] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[3] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[4] 聂秀鹏, 逄焕平, 孙志彬, 谢松梅, 侯超群. 三维加筋边坡地震稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
[5] 朱才辉, 崔 晨, 兰开江, 东永强. 砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物拆除 对榆林卫城稳定性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3153-3166.
[6] 陈冲, 王卫, 吕华永, . 基于复合抗滑桩模型加固边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3207-3217.
[7] 陈建功, 李 会, 贺自勇, . 基于变分法的均质土坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2931-2937.
[8] 张海娜, 陈从新, 郑 允, 孙朝燚, 张亚鹏, 刘秀敏, . 坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[9] 蒋泽锋, 张戈, 朱大勇, 王军, . 锚固力作用下的边坡临界滑动场法研究与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2799-2806.
[10] 王宏磊, 孙志忠, 刘永智, 武贵龙, . 青藏铁路含融化夹层路基热力响应监测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2815-2824.
[11] 陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[12] 吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及 破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[13] 李 驰, 王 硕, 王燕星, 高 瑜, 斯日古楞, . 沙漠微生物矿化覆膜及其稳定性的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1291-1298.
[14] 余 国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜 岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[15] 吴梦喜, 高桂云, 杨家修, 湛正刚, . 砂砾石土的管涌临界渗透坡降预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 861-870.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 周火垚,施建勇. 饱和软黏土中足尺静压桩挤土效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3291 -3296 .
[2] 马少坤,黄茂松,扈 萍,秦会来. 吸力强度修正对数模型在地基承载力中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1853 -1857 .
[3] 董 云,何卫忠,孙 蔚. 隔堤填筑路堤的稳定性及变形破坏模式分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2471 -2478 .
[4] 叶 斌,叶冠林,长屋淳一. 采用土工合成材料的新型护岸结构的动态数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 442 -446 .
[5] 高彦斌,崔玉军. 微气候能量分析法在岩土工程分析中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 433 -439 .
[6] 石 崇,徐卫亚,周家文,张金龙. 节理面透射模型及其隔振性能研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 729 -734 .
[7] 庞大鹏,陈剑平,王丹微. 节理网络分形在隧道超前地质预报中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1415 -1420 .
[8] 杨荣伟,程晓辉. 光弹颗粒材料的直剪实验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 103 -109 .
[9] 孙 博,周仲华,张虎元,张永霞,郑 龙. 夯土建筑遗址表面温度变化特征及预报模型[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 867 -871 .
[10] 林 萍 ,叶冠林 ,陈 楠 ,王建华 ,桥本正. 冻结法施工旁通道的冻土压力现场监测方法[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2555 -2560 .