›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 2938-2944.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

主应力轴旋转对地铁荷载作用下 软黏土累积变形的影响

肖军华1,许世芹1,韦 凯2,洪英维3   

  1. 1.南京工业大学 交通学院,南京 210009;2.西南交通大学 高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室,成都 610031; 3.江西省交通设计院有限责任公司,南昌 330002
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-14 出版日期:2013-10-09 发布日期:2013-10-18
  • 作者简介:肖军华,男,1980年生,博士(后),副教授,从事轨道交通系统动力学的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助(No. 51008158,No. 51008257);上海市博士后科研计划资助(No. 10R21416300)

Influences of rotation of principal stress axis on accumulative deformation of soft clay under subway cyclic loading

XIAO Jun-hua1, XU Shi-qin1, WEI Kai2, HONG Ying-wei3   

  1. 1. College of Transportation & Engineering, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing 210009, China; 2. Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China; 3. Communications Design Institute Co., Ltd of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330002, China
  • Received:2013-04-14 Online:2013-10-09 Published:2013-10-18

摘要: 为了定量评价主应力轴旋转对地铁荷载作用下隧道下卧软黏土累积变形的影响,通过有限元方法并结合实测数据的验证对地铁荷载下地基土的应力路径进行分析;在此基础上,借助空心圆柱仪对这一复杂应力路径进行室内模拟和对比试验研究。结果表明:主应力轴旋转增大了软黏土的累积变形,且最大有效主应力比(有效最大主应力与有效最小主应力之比)越大、或加载频率越高增大更明显。在实际地铁荷载和通常隧道埋深条件下,考虑主应力轴旋转使软黏土的累积变形增加9%~23%(加载频率越高,增加越大)。可用常规循环三轴的累积变形试验结果乘以土体分别在有、无主应力轴旋转下变形的比值,来预估实际地铁荷载下软黏土的累积变形,初步研究得到该比值与土体的最大有效主应力比之间存在幂函数关系。

关键词: 地铁动荷载, 主应力轴旋转, 软黏土, 累积变形

Abstract: In order to investigate the influences of continuous rotation of principal stress axis on the accumulative deformation of soft clay lying below subway tunnel under subway dynamic loading, the finite element method (FEM) combined with field measurement data is used to analyze the complex stress path in subsoil induced by subway loading, and then the hollow cylinder apparatus (HCA) is used to simulate the stress path in laboratory and to carry out comparison tests. Experimental results show that: the continuous rotation of principal stress axis increases the accumulative deformation of soft clay; and the effect is more significant at higher effective principal stress ratio (i.e. the ratio of the effective maximum principal stress to the effective minimum principal stress) or loading frequency. Under the realistic subway loading and the usual tunnel depth, the continuous rotation of principal stress axis magnifies the accumulative deformation of soft clay between 1.09 and 1.23 times (the higher the loading frequency is, the greater the magnification is). The actual accumulative deformation of soft clay under the realistic subway loading (i.e. with continuous rotation of principal stress axis) can be estimated by multiplying the accumulative deformation obtained from traditional cyclic triaxial tests (i.e. without principal stress axis rotation) by the ratio of axial strains between tests with and without principal stress axis rotation. The preliminary study shows there exists power function between the ratio and the maximum effective principal stress ratio of soil.

Key words: subway cynamic loading, continuous rotation of principal stress axis, soft clay, accumulative deformation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435
[1] 孙红, 宋春雨, 滕慕薇, 葛修润. 加荷条件下软黏土的孔隙演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 141-146.
[2] 戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[3] 罗庆姿, 陈晓平, 袁炳祥, 冯德銮, . 柔性侧限条件下软土的变形特性及固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2264-2274.
[4] 夏唐代, 郑晴晴, 陈秀良, . 基于累积动应力水平的间歇加载下超孔压预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1483-1490.
[5] 冯凌云, 朱斌, 代加林, 孔德琼, . 深海管道水平向管−土相互作用 大变形连续极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4907-4915.
[6] 雷华阳, 刘广学, 周 骏, . 吹填场区双层软黏土地基承载特性及破坏模式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 260-268.
[7] 时 刚,刘忠玉,李永辉. 循环荷载作用下考虑非达西渗流的软黏土一维流变固结分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 521-528.
[8] 程星磊,王建华,王哲学,. 软黏土中吸力锚循环失稳过程的模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3285-3293.
[9] 刘家顺,张向东,孙嘉宝,杨建军,方天健. 主应力轴旋转下K0固结饱和粉质黏土孔压及变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2787-2794.
[10] 汪明元,吴金标,张建经,廖蔚茗,闫孔明,. 一种适用于室内模型试验的循环加载装置研制及试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1145-1152.
[11] 闫澍旺,张京京,田英辉,陈 浩,. 等向固结饱和黏土卸载孔压特性的试验与理论研究[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 775-781.
[12] 胡秀青,张 艳,符洪涛,陈 琳,罗 盼,聂 勇, 王 军, . 水平双向荷载耦合对饱和软黏土动力特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 839-847.
[13] 宋林辉,王宇豪,付 磊,梅国雄,. 软黏土中地下结构浮力测试试验与分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 753-758.
[14] 陈 波,孙德安,高 游,李 健,. 上海软黏土的孔径分布试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2523-2530.
[15] 高彦斌,张松波,葛潇楠,. 我国沿海地区软黏土压缩指数统计及与国外其他地区对比[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2713-2720.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘 晓,唐辉明,刘 瑜. 基于集对分析和模糊马尔可夫链的滑坡变形预测新方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3399 -3405 .
[2] 胡大伟,周 辉,谢守益,张 凯,邵建富,冯夏庭. 大理岩破坏阶段Biot系数研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3727 -3732 .
[3] 师旭超,韩 阳. 卸荷作用下软黏土回弹吸水试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 732 -736 .
[4] 朱建明,彭新坡,姚仰平,徐金海. SMP准则在计算煤柱极限强度中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2987 -2990 .
[5] 原喜忠,李 宁,赵秀云,杨银涛. 东北多年冻土地区地基承载力对气候变化敏感性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3265 -3272 .
[6] 白 冰,李小春,石 露,唐礼忠. 弹塑性应力-应变曲线的斜率恒等式及其验证和应用[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3789 -3792 .
[7] 唐利民. 地基沉降预测模型的正则化算法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3945 -3948 .
[8] 李占海,朱万成,冯夏庭,李绍军,周 辉,陈炳瑞. 侧压力系数对马蹄形隧道损伤破坏的影响研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 434 -441 .
[9] 蔡辉腾,危福泉,蔡宗文. 重庆主城区粉质黏土动力特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 224 -228 .
[10] 宋 玲 ,刘奉银 ,李 宁 . 旋压入土式静力触探机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 787 -0792 .