沉积泥砂非线性大变形固结沉降计算模型

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 3003-3010.

沉积泥砂非线性大变形固结沉降计算模型

郭帅杰^{1, 2}，王保田^{1, 2}，张福海^{1, 2}

1.河海大学岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室，南京 210098；2.河海大学岩土工程科学研究所，南京 210098

收稿日期:2013-03-24 出版日期:2013-10-09 发布日期:2013-10-18
作者简介:郭帅杰，男，1987，博士，主要从事软土地基固结沉降计算与软基处理方面研究工作
基金资助:
教育部博士点基金“含重金属高含水率淤泥的固化利用与力学性质研究”（No. 20100094110002）

Numerical model for nonlinear large strain consolidation of deposited sediment

GUO Shuai-jie^{1, 2}, WANG Bao-tian^{1, 2}, ZHANG Fu-hai^{1, 2}

1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China

Received:2013-03-24 Online:2013-10-09 Published:2013-10-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 沉积形成的水底黏性泥砂自重固结过程表现出显著非线性大变形固结特征，应采用大变形固结理论进行泥砂沉积固结计算。基于软黏土一维非线性大应变固结理论，应用有效应力、渗透系数与孔隙比间扩展幂次函数固结本构关系，由达西定律、有效应力原理、连续介质方程等建立大变形固结控制方程，根据固结单元孔隙水渗流、单元变形与泥砂沉积层固结沉降耦合关系形成黏性泥砂大变形自重固结数值模型。泥砂自重作为固结荷载，数值模型假定沉积泥砂各向同性且固结沉降应变、孔隙水渗流仅发生于竖直方向，为一维单向沉积固结过程；采用泥砂沉降柱试验确定泥砂非线性扩展幂次函数关系参数。模型应用中，划分竖向固结单元，由沉积泥砂固结本构关系确定各固结单元有效应力及超孔隙水应力，通过超孔隙水应力时间维度上的消散过程及各固结参数间的耦合关系计算泥砂固结沉降。数值模型计算结果表明，沉积黏性泥砂自重固结初期表现为有效应力调整过程，初始有效应力与孔隙比根据固结本构关系匹配调整为扩展幂次函数关系；沉积泥砂应变与应力固结度存在20%左右误差，泥砂固结沉降发展快于超孔隙水应力消散过程，证明沉积泥砂固结沉降变形的发展与超孔隙水应力消散并非同步耦合。计算模型应用于室内沉降柱试验模拟淤积黏性泥砂自重固结沉降预测中，模型输出与试验结果符合良好。

关键词: 大变形固结, 沉降, 黏性泥砂, 数值模型, 沉降柱试验

Abstract: Large strain consolidation theory is applied to calculate deposited cohesive sediment weight deposition and consolidation for the significant nonlinear large strain characteristics. Based on soft soil one-dimensional general large strain consolidation theory and the application of quasi-power functional consolidation constitutive relationships between effective stress, permeability and void ratio, nonlinear large strain consolidation governing equation can be built up according to Darcy law, effective stress principle as well as the soil continuous equation. By the coupling relationship of pore water seepage, element deformation and weight consolidation settlement, a full cohesive sediment weight consolidation numerical model is developed for the nonlinear large strain characteristics. With the fact that deposited sediment weight is as the consolidation loading, the new developed model assumes the deposited sediment layer is homogenous, and the consolidation settlement along with the pore water seepage only occurs in vertical direction, and then the sediment consolidation process can be seen as one dimensional weight consolidation. Moreover, nonlinear quasi-power consolidation constitutive relationship parameters are determined by the cohesive sediment settlement column experiment. Consolidation elements are applied to evaluate the effective stress, excessive pore pressure of different depths, and deposited sediment consolidation settlement is determined by the dissipation of excessive pore pressure in time scale. Numerical model performance shows that there is a clear adjustment process for the relationship of deposited layer effective stress and the void ratio according to the quasi-power functional constitutive relationship in the initial stage. An approximate 20% error between stress and strain consolidation degree means that deposited sediment consolidation settlement develops faster than excessive pore pressure dissipation, which also proves the asynchronous coupling relationship of consolidation deformation and excessive pore pressure dissipation in large strain consolidation. According to the numerical model performances in cohesive sediment consolidation with settlement column experiment, the new developed model outputs show a well agreement with the measured one.

Key words: large strain consolidation, settlement, deposited sediment, numerical model, settlement column experiment

中图分类号:

TU 441+.4

郭帅杰，王保田，张福海 . 沉积泥砂非线性大变形固结沉降计算模型[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 3003-3010.

GUO Shuai-jie , WANG Bao-tian , ZHANG Fu-hai . Numerical model for nonlinear large strain consolidation of deposited sediment[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 3003-3010.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[2]	刘成禹, 陈博文, 罗洪林, 阮家椿, . 满流条件下管道破损诱发渗流侵蚀的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 1-10.
[3]	刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[4]	张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[5]	卢谅, 石通辉, 杨东, . 置换减载与加筋复合处理方法对路基不均匀沉降控制效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3474-3482.
[6]	张治国, 黄茂松, 杨轩, . 基于衬砌长期渗漏水影响的隧道施工扰动诱发超孔隙水压消散及地层固结沉降解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.
[7]	杜文, 王永红, 李利, 朱连臣, 朱浩天, 王有旗, . 双层车站密贴下穿既有隧道案例分析及隧道沉降变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2765-2773.
[8]	黄大维, 周顺华, 冯青松, 罗锟, 雷晓燕, 许有俊, . 地表均布超载作用下盾构隧道上覆土层竖向土压力转移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2213-2220.
[9]	张治国, 张瑞, 黄茂松, 宫剑飞, . 基于差异沉降和轴向刚度控制的竖向荷载作用下群桩基础优化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2354-2368.
[10]	蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周洋, 闫婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[11]	王胤, 周令新, 杨庆. 基于不规则钙质砂颗粒发展的拖曳力系数模型及其在细观流固耦合数值模拟中应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2009-2015.
[12]	刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
[13]	刘成禹, 张翔, 程凯, 陈博文, . 地下工程涌水涌砂诱发的沉降试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 843-851.
[14]	谭国宏, 肖海珠, 杜勋, 胡文军. 大跨度公铁合建斜拉桥主塔沉井基础沉降变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1113-1120.
[15]	徐鹏, 蒋关鲁, 任世杰, 田鸿程, 王智猛, . 红层泥岩及其改良填料路基动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 678-683.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed