›› 2007, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (12): 2652-2656.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

邻近堆载作用下排桩负摩擦力特性研究

屠毓敏,王建江   

  1. TU Yu-min, Wang Jian-jiang
  • 收稿日期:2005-12-05 出版日期:2007-12-10 发布日期:2013-10-18
  • 作者简介:屠毓敏,男,1965年生,副教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作

Study on negative friction characteristic of row piles subjected to surcharge nearby

TU Yu-min, Wang Jian-jiang   

  1. Department of Civil Engineering,Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027;China
  • Received:2005-12-05 Online:2007-12-10 Published:2013-10-18

摘要: 利用三维非线性弹性有限元方法研究了承受邻近堆载作用的排桩的负摩擦力特性,分析了排桩间距以及堆载与排桩之间距离的变化对桩身负摩擦力特性的影响,揭示了该类桩桩身轴力的变化规律。研究表明:随着堆载的增大,桩身轴力也随之增大,当堆载增至一定值时,桩间土产生土拱效应,桩身轴力略为减小,堆载继续增大时,土拱效应遭到破坏,桩身轴力再次增大;当堆载增大到一定值时,桩顶部产生局部拉应力,且随着堆载与桩之间距离的增大而增大,中桩的拉应力比边桩要大;桩身最大轴力点位于0.65~0.75倍的桩长处,边桩的轴力大于中桩;随着桩距的增大,桩身轴力也随之增大,而土拱效应削弱;当堆载距排桩一定距离时,桩身轴力达到最大。

关键词: 负摩擦排桩, 堆载, 三维有限元, 土拱效应

Abstract: Three-dimensional nonlinear elastic finite element method had been developed to study the negative friction behavior of the row piles subjected to surcharge nearby. The influence of the space between the row piles and the distance between surcharge and row piles on the negative behavior of the row piles was analyzed. The varying law of the axial force of this kind of piles was posted. Study showed that the axial force of piles increased as surcharge increased. While surcharge increased to a certain value, the soil between the piles brought soil-arch effect and then the axial force of piles decreased a little. While surcharge increased continuously, the soil-arch effect suffered destroy, the axial force of piles increased again. While surcharge increased to a certain value, tensile stress produced partly in the top of piles, it increased with the growth of distance between surcharge and piles, middle piles were more tensile stress than side piles. The most axial force of piles lay in 0.65-0.75 time pile length; side piles were more axial force than middle piles. With the increase of piles’ space the axial force of the piles increased; and soil-arch effect dented. The axial force of piles reached maximum, as a certain distance between surcharge and piles.

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 芮 瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈 成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙 主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[2] 陈 峥, 何 平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, . 考虑土拱效应的管棚合理间距计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1993-2000.
[3] 吴顺川, 马 骏, 程 业, 成子桥, 李建宇, . 平台巴西圆盘研究综述及三维启裂点研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1239-1247.
[4] 刘 洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状 与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[5] 尹志强,佘成学,姚海林,卢 正,骆行文,. 考虑土拱效应的黏性填土排桩桩后土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 131-139.
[6] 魏焕卫,孙 川,王建强,李 瑜,刘 聪,张 伟,. 堆载下桩+地下墙水平承载组合基础模型试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 203-210.
[7] 赖丰文,陈福全,万梁龙,. 考虑不完全土拱效应的浅层地基竖向应力计算[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2546-2554.
[8] 徐长节,梁禄钜,陈其志,刘元昆,. 考虑松动区内应力分布形式的松动土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1927-1934.
[9] 康 成, 梅国雄, 梁荣柱, 吴文兵, 方宇翔, 柯宅邦, . 地表临时堆载诱发下既有盾构隧道纵向变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4605-4616.
[10] 杨 贵,王阳阳,刘彦辰, . 基于曲线滑裂面的挡墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2182-2188.
[11] 刘 勇,戚 蓝,李少明,郭浩洋,. 考虑变井阻和涂抹效应的真空预压三维有限元分析[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1517-1523.
[12] 李瑞林,周国庆,林 超,赵光思,陈国舟,. 考虑土拱效应的滑移面间非极限状态土压力解答[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3145-3153.
[13] 孙潇昊,缪林昌,林海山. 不同埋深砂土盾构隧道掘进开挖面前方土拱效应研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2980-2988.
[14] 蔡 强,李乾坤,石胜伟,张 勇, . 钢管抗滑短桩受力特性物理模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 679-684.
[15] 李小娟,陈雪奖,戴国亮,龚维明,. 黏性土中钻孔灌注桩自平衡转换系数取值研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 226-232.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李鸿博,郭小红. 公路连拱隧道土压力荷载的计算方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3429 -3434 .
[2] 瞿万波,刘新荣,傅晏,秦晓英. 洞桩法大断面群洞交叉隧道初衬数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2799 -2804 .
[3] 王川婴,胡培良,孙卫春. 基于钻孔摄像技术的岩体完整性评价方法[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1326 -1330 .
[4] 李华明,蒋关鲁,刘先峰. CFG桩加固饱和粉土地基的动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1550 -1554 .
[5] 郭保华. 单孔岩样水压致裂的数值分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1965 -1970 .
[6] 谈云志,孔令伟,郭爱国,万 智. 压实红黏土水分传输的毛细效应与数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2289 -2294 .
[7] 王生新,陆勇翔,尹亚雄,郭定一. 碎石土湿陷性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2373 -2377 .
[8] 王云岗,熊 凯,凌道盛. 基于平动加转动运动场的边坡稳定上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2619 -2624 .
[9] 魏新江,郭志威,魏 纲,张世民. 考虑渗流影响的盾构出洞灾害机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 106 -110 .
[10] 王洪亮 ,范鹏贤 ,王明洋 ,李文培 ,钱岳红. 应变率对红砂岩渐进破坏过程和特征应力的影响[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1340 -1346 .