推移式滑坡演化过程模型试验与数值模拟研究

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 3018-3027.

推移式滑坡演化过程模型试验与数值模拟研究

雍睿，胡新丽，唐辉明，李长冬，马俊伟，宋友建

中国地质大学工程学院，武汉 430074

收稿日期:2013-01-20 出版日期:2013-10-09 发布日期:2013-10-18
通讯作者: 胡新丽，女，1968年生，博士，教授，主要从事岩土工程稳定性评价、地质灾害防治设计教学与科研工作。E-mail: huxli2000@163.com E-mail:yongruicug@gmail.com
作者简介:雍睿，男，1987年生，博士研究生，主要从事岩土体力学试验研究方面的工作
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目资助（No. 2011CB710604）；国家自然科学基金项目（No. 41230637，No. 41202198）；中国地质大学（武汉）教学实验室开放基金项目（No. skj2012139）

Model testing and numerical simulation study of evolutionary process of thrust load caused landslide

YONG Rui, HU Xin-li, TANG Hui-ming, LI Chang-dong, MA Jun-wei, SONG You-jian

Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2013-01-20 Online:2013-10-09 Published:2013-10-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用MTS电液伺服加载与控制系统对推移式滑坡物理模型后缘进行了分级推力加载，完成了推移式滑坡演化全过程的模拟。基于三维激光扫描技术对滑体表面的位移和变形进行了高精度、全方位、非连续性监测。采用多重分形基本理论对监测点云数据进行了系统分析，从试验的角度探讨了推移式滑坡演化过程中位移多重分形维数的变化特征。模型试验结果表明：推移式滑坡变形破坏以沿滑带发生的整体滑移为主，并表现出明显的演化阶段性特征，大致可划分为3个阶段：（1）后缘压缩阶段：滑坡模型表面变形体现为后缘土体的局部前移与隆起，整体变形小，多重分形维数成降维的特征，降维过程中未发生突变、有序性好；（2）匀速变形阶段：滑坡模型表面产生了明显的位移，变形不断向前和向两侧发展，前缘、中部滑体发生隆起现象，多重分形维数表现出先减后增的趋势；（3）加速变形阶段：滑坡模型表面体现出持续、快速、变化鲜明的整体变形特征，伴随出现滑坡模型中前部隆起带及横向、纵向的隆胀裂缝，多重分形维数成增维趋势。基于模型试验，利用FLAC3D进行了推移式滑坡演化过程的动态数值模拟，验证了滑坡演化的阶段性特征，揭示了推移式滑坡演化过程中稳定性系数非线性递减的规律。

关键词: 滑坡, 模型试验, 演化, 多重分维数, 三维激光扫描

Abstract: A physical model has been developed to study the whole evolutionary process of thrust load caused landslide under the multi-stage loading of MTS electro-hydraulic servo loading and analysis system. The displacement and deformation of the thrust load caused landslide model’s top surface are non-consecutively monitored with advanced 3D laser scanning technology. On the basis of multi-fractal theory, the variation of multi-fractal dimension of displacement in the evolutionary process of thrust load caused landslide is studied through the experiment. The experimental results show that the deformation and failure mode of thrust load caused landslide are dominated by general shear failure and it presents explicit developing phased characteristics. When the slope is in margin compressing stage, the deformation on the surface of the landslide is formed as some parts moving forward and uplift on the margin of the landslide, and the multi-fractal dimensions of displacement are decreasing orderly. When the slope is in uniform deformation stage, obvious displacement can be seen on the surface of the landslide model and the deformation keeps spreading to the front and sides of it. Uplift phenomenon can be seen in some parts in the front and center. During this stage, the multi-fractal dimensions of displacement decrease firstly, and then increase. When the slope is in accelerating deformation stage, landslide model surface presents sustained, rapid and obvious deformation associated with horizontal, vertical expansion cracks in the front and center part of it. During this stage, the multi-fractal dimensions of displacement are increasing gradually. Based on the landslide physical model test, FLAC3D numerical software is used to simulate the evolutionary process of thrust load caused landslide. It is verified that evolutionary process of landslide can be divided into the above three stages. Also the simulation discloses that the attenuation of the stability coefficient of landslide is nonlinear and the attenuation rate is decreasing.

Key words: landslide, model test, evolution, multi-fractal dimension, 3D laser scanning

中图分类号:

P 642.22

雍睿，胡新丽，唐辉明，李长冬，马俊伟，宋友建. 推移式滑坡演化过程模型试验与数值模拟研究[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 3018-3027.

YONG Rui, HU Xin-li, TANG Hui-ming, LI Chang-dong, MA Jun-wei, SONG You-jian. Model testing and numerical simulation study of evolutionary process of thrust load caused landslide[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 3018-3027.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[2]	陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
[3]	高峰, 曹善鹏, 熊信, 周科平, 朱龙胤, . 冻融循环作用下受荷青砂岩的脆性演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 445-452.
[4]	宋勇军, 杨慧敏, 张磊涛, 任建喜. 冻结红砂岩单轴损伤破坏CT实时试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 152-160.
[5]	于一帆, 王平, 王会娟, 许书雅, 郭海涛, . 堆积层滑坡地震动力响应的物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[6]	翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[7]	闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[8]	雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[9]	王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[10]	陈宇龙, 内村太郎, . 基于弹性波波速的降雨型滑坡预警系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3373-3386.
[11]	王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[12]	卢谅, 石通辉, 杨东, . 置换减载与加筋复合处理方法对路基不均匀沉降控制效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3474-3482.
[13]	陈永青, 文畅平, 方炫强, . 生物酶改良膨胀土的修正殷宗泽模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3515-3523.
[14]	黄晓虎, 雷德鑫, 夏俊宝, 易武, 张鹏, . 降雨诱发滑坡阶跃型变形的预测分析及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3585-3592.
[15]	杨文波, 邹涛, 涂玖林, 谷笑旭, 刘雨辰, 晏启祥, 何川. 高速列车振动荷载作用下马蹄形断面隧道动力响应特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3635-3644.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed