泥岩夹层软化试验研究

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 3110-3116.

泥岩夹层软化试验研究

任松¹，文永江¹，姜德义¹，陈结¹，屈丹安^{1, 3}，杨春和^{1, 2}

1. 重庆大学煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室，重庆 400044；2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室，武汉 430071；3. 中国石油天然气股份有限公司西气东输管道分公司储气库项目部，江苏金坛 213200

收稿日期:2012-09-07 出版日期:2013-11-09 发布日期:2013-11-11
作者简介:任松，男，1975年生，博士，副教授，从事岩土工程力学方面的教学和科研工作
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）(No. 2009CB724606)；国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51074198)；重庆市科委自然科学基金计划资助(No. 2010BB6044)。

Experimental research on softening in mudstone interlayer

REN Song¹，WEN Yong-jiang¹，JIANG De-yi¹，CHEN Jie¹，QU Dan-an^{1, 3}，YANG Chun-he^{1, 2}

1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; 3.Gas Storage Project Department, West-to-East Pipeline Company, Petro China Company Limited, Jintan, Jiangsu 213200, China

Received:2012-09-07 Online:2013-11-09 Published:2013-11-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于正交试验方案，研究了温度、卤水浓度及浸泡时间3个因素对泥岩夹层软化的影响规律。分别运用极差分析法和方差分析法对试验结果进行分析。对任意两个影响因素分别进行二元线性回归，根据其标准回归系数对泥岩夹层单轴抗压强度及弹性模量相对重要性比值构建判断矩阵，运用层次分析法计算各个影响因素的权值。试验结果表明：温度和浸泡时间在泥岩夹层软化过程中起着决定作用，影响权重达到98%以上；浸泡时间的影响最大，权重达到80%；卤水浓度的变化对泥岩夹层软化影响较微弱，在实际的工程中可以忽略不计。随着浸泡时间的延长和温度的升高，泥岩夹层内部裂隙逐渐被溶液侵入，单轴抗压强度和弹性模量呈递减趋势。鉴于卤水浓度影响甚微，仅利用温度和浸泡时间建立了软化方程。

关键词: 泥岩夹层, 正交试验, 单轴抗压强度, 弹性模量, 层次分析法

Abstract: Based on orthogonal test, the softening mudstone interlayer effected by three factors, i.e. temperature, brine density and immersion time, is studied. The extremum difference analysis and variance analysis are respectively applied to analyzing the results of the test. Any two factors are the binary liner regression; the relative importance ratio according to the standardized regression coefficients for the uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of mudstone interlayer is used to build judgment matrix; analytic hierarchy process is used to calculate weights of various factors. The results show that the temperature and the immersion time play a decisive role on the softening process of mudstone interlayer; and the weights of analytic hierarchy process are more than 98%. The greatest influencing factor is immersion time whose weight is about 80%. The change of brine density has hardly any effect; therefore it can be neglected in the practical project. With the immersion time extending and the temperature increasing, the cracks in mudstone interlayer are gradually intruded into solution; meanwhile, the uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus show a decreasing trend. In view of the insignificant role the brine density plays in the whole experiment, only temperature and immersion time are taken into consideration to establish the equations.

Key words: mudstone interlayer, orthogonal test, uniaxial compressive strength, elastic modulus, analytic hierarchy process

中图分类号:

TU 452

任松，文永江，姜德义，陈结，屈丹安，杨春和 , . 泥岩夹层软化试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(11): 3110-3116.

REN Song ，WEN Yong-jiang ，JIANG De-yi ，CHEN Jie ，QU Dan-an ，YANG Chun-he . Experimental research on softening in mudstone interlayer[J]. , 2013, 34(11): 3110-3116.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 多孔隙岩石加卸载力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2673-2685.
[2]	王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[3]	付宏渊, 刘杰, 曾铃, 卞汉兵, 史振宁, . 考虑荷载与浸水条件的预崩解炭质泥岩变形与强度试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1273-1280.
[4]	王琦, 孙会彬, 江贝, 高松, 李术才, 高红科, . 基于数字钻探和支持向量机预测岩体单轴抗压强度的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1221-1228.
[5]	顾晓强, 杨朔成, . 基于离散元数值方法的砂土小应变弹性特性探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 785-791.
[6]	庄心善, 王俊翔, 王康, 李凯, 胡智. 风化砂改良膨胀土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 149-156.
[7]	李深圳, 沙鹏, 伍法权, 伍劼. 层状结构岩体变形的各向异性特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 366-373.
[8]	陈瑞锋，田高源，米栋云，董晓强,. 赤泥改性黄土的基本工程性质研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 89-97.
[9]	乐慧琳，孙少锐. 注浆材料和预制裂纹缺陷角度对类岩石试件单轴抗压强度及破坏模式的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 211-219.
[10]	张帆，胡维，郭翰群，胡大伟，盛谦，邵建富,. 热处理后花岗岩纳米压痕试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 235-243.
[11]	曹帅，宋卫东，薛改利，. 考虑间歇充填和浓度效应的充填体长期强度试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 341-347.
[12]	吴永胜，谭忠盛，余贤斌，喻渝，朱勇,. 不同加载方位角下单轴压缩千枚岩扩容特性[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2747-2754.
[13]	张燕，于大伟，叶剑红，. 岩石类材料拉伸弹性模量测量方法的对比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2295-2303.
[14]	王闵闵，鹿群，郭少龙，高萌，沈仲涛，. 循环荷载作用下纤维水泥土动力特性[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1753-1760.
[15]	任松，李振元，邓高岭，刘伟，蒲文明，. 多因素作用下石膏岩软化特性[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 789-796.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed