降雨和蒸发对土质边坡稳定性的影响

›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 778-781.

降雨和蒸发对土质边坡稳定性的影响

魏宁¹，茜平一²，傅旭东¹

1.武汉大学土木与建筑工程学院，武汉 430072；2.广东水利水电学院，广州 510635

收稿日期:2004-01-28 出版日期:2006-05-10 发布日期:2013-11-05
作者简介:魏宁，1978年生，博士研究生，主要从事岩土工程的数值方法研究
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（No.50378073）

Effects of rainfall infiltration and evaporation on soil slope stability

WEI Ning¹, QIAN Ping-yi², FU Xu-dong¹

(1.School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China; 2.Guangdong Technical College of Water Resources and Electric Engineering, Guangzhou 510635, China

Received:2004-01-28 Online:2006-05-10 Published:2013-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 降雨入渗降低边坡的稳定性，蒸发增加边坡的稳定性，降雨和蒸发对边坡稳定性的定量研究是很有意义的。采用蒸发和降雨模型对边坡进行非饱和-非稳定渗流分析，用总凝聚力表示的Bishop极限平衡法计算边坡安全系数。采用数值方法对算例土质边坡进行了研究，得到了孔隙水压力随时间变化的关系、边坡安全系数随时间变化的关系。结果显示：土体中孔隙水压力与天气条件、边坡安全系数与天气条件之间存在滞后关系；降雨和蒸发对边坡的表层滑动稳定性影响非常大，对深层滑动稳定性影响相对较小；降雨过程中边坡的临界滑动面由较深位置向较浅位置转变，蒸发过程则相反。

关键词: 非饱和土, 非饱和-非稳定渗流, 边坡稳定, 降雨和蒸发, 有限单元法

Abstract: It is advantageous to know how much rainwater decreases or evaporation increases the stability of a soil slope. Numerical model was used to quantify the effect of rainwater and evaporation on the stability of a case slope. With raining model and evaporation model, unsaturated-unsteady seepage analysis was used to calculate pore pressure of the case slope, and Bishop Equilibrium balance method with total cohesion was used to calculate the stability factor of the case slope. Relationships between the pore pressure and time, between the safety of stability and time were obtained. Results show that changes in slope stability and pore pressure lag behind the change of weather; infiltration and evaporation affect the stability of shallow slip surface greatly, the stability of deep slip surface relatively little; in the process of rain, the critical slip surface changes from deep surface to relative shallow surface, in the process of evaporation, the situation is opposite.

Key words: unsaturated soil, unsaturated -unsteady seepage, slope stability, rainfall and evaporation, FEM

中图分类号:

TU 432

魏宁，茜平一，傅旭东 . 降雨和蒸发对土质边坡稳定性的影响[J]. , 2006, 27(5): 778-781.

WEI Ning , QIAN Ping-yi , FU Xu-dong . Effects of rainfall infiltration and evaporation on soil slope stability[J]. , 2006, 27(5): 778-781.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	周凤玺, 高国耀, . 非饱和土中热−湿−盐耦合作用的稳态分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2050-2058.
[2]	陶高梁, 吴小康, 甘世朝, 肖衡林, 马强, 罗晨晨, . 不同初始孔隙比下非饱和黏土渗透性试验研究及模型预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1761-1770.
[3]	余国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[4]	方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 赵伟龙, 王立平, 余永强, . 真三轴条件下原状黄土的非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 517-528.
[5]	陈正汉, 郭楠、. 非饱和土与特殊土力学及工程应用研究的新进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 1-54.
[6]	刘素锦, 郭明伟, 李春光, . 三维边坡整体主滑方向的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 37-44.
[7]	代仲海，胡再强，尹小涛，吴振君，. 工程荷载作用下缓倾角反倾似层状岩质边坡变形稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 412-418.
[8]	段晓梦，曾立峰, . 非饱和土的承载结构与岩土广义结构性[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3103-3112.
[9]	李宣, 孙德安，张俊然,. 吸力历史对非饱和粉土动力变形特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2829-2836.
[10]	秦雨樵，汤华，冯振洋，尹小涛，王东英, . 基于聚类分析的边坡稳定性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2977-2983.
[11]	徐筱，赵成刚，蔡国庆，. 区分毛细和吸附作用的非饱和土抗剪强度模型[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2059-2064.
[12]	郭重阳，李典庆，曹子君，高国辉，唐小松. 考虑空间变异性条件下的边坡稳定可靠度高效敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2203-2210.
[13]	周亚东，邓安，鹿群, . 非饱和土一维大变形固结模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1675-1682.
[14]	方瑾瑾，冯以鑫，朱昌星，. 真三轴条件下Q3原状黄土的力学特性[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1699-1708.
[15]	张沛然，黄雪峰，扈胜霞，杨校辉，. 非饱和填土侧限压缩变形特性试验研究及应用初探[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 437-444.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed