管涌与滤层的研究:管涌部分

›› 2005, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 209-215.

管涌与滤层的研究:管涌部分

毛昶熙

南京水利科学研究院，江苏南京 210029

收稿日期:2003-09-27 出版日期:2005-02-10 发布日期:2013-11-19
作者简介:毛昶熙，男，教授级高工。主要从事水工、渗流研究

Study on piping and filters : part I of piging

MAO Chang-xi

Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China

Received:2003-09-27 Online:2005-02-10 Published:2013-11-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对管涌和滤层两个相关联问题的研究发展过程进行了综述和评论，并将过去的研究成果与之比较。管涌问题是土体渗透变形的一个重要现象，关系到地基的渗流破坏。首先探讨了管涌的内在涵义，评述了当今管涌的研究现状及其发展方向，然后介绍了一些过去的试验资料、研究成果和计算公式，包括管涌土与非管涌土的判别方法，垂直向上渗流和水平渗流时的管涌临界坡降，并引用目前文献中的试验资料验证其公式是可靠的，最后说明了建立在土颗粒级配曲线上的管涌研究方法是当前的研究趋势，因而对这些过去的研究成果进行比较、讨论是有益的。

关键词: 管涌, 滤层, 管涌土, 临界坡降, 级配曲线

Abstract: In this paper the piping and filter, two correlative topics, are stated and the background of studying development is reviewed. Meanwhile our studied results are also given for comparison. This is part I about piping topic which is an important phenomenon of seepage deformation and related to the foundation destroying caused by seepage. Firstly, the inherent meaning of piping and the present studying situation with its developing direction are discussed and criticized. Secondly, our experimental data in past about piping and the studied results with formulas, including the discriminating method of piping soil and non-piping soil and the piping critical gradients for seepage flow upward and horizontal, are introduced. Then the published experimental data in references up to date are cited to verify the writer’s formulas once again that shows reliable after verification. Also it shows that the method of piping study based on the soil grain size grading curve is the latest studying trend. Therefore publishing those past studied results for comparison and discussion is beneficial.

Key words: piping, filter, piping soil, critical gradient, grading curve

中图分类号:

O 357.3

毛昶熙. 管涌与滤层的研究:管涌部分[J]. , 2005, 26(2): 209-215.

MAO Chang-xi. Study on piping and filters : part I of piging[J]. , 2005, 26(2): 209-215.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	吴梦喜, 高桂云, 杨家修, 湛正刚, . 砂砾石土的管涌临界渗透坡降预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 861-870.
[2]	曹洪，肖莹萍 , . 渗透变形过程中临空面表层土体渗透特性变化试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2465-2472.
[3]	吴梦喜，余挺，张琦，. 深厚覆盖层潜蚀对大坝应力变形影响的有限元模拟[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2087-2095.
[4]	陈建生，袁克龙，王霜，张华，何文政 , . 细砂层埋深对堤基管涌影响的试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 653-659.
[5]	杨贵，许建宝，刘昆林 , . 粗粒料颗粒破碎数值模拟研究[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3301-3306.
[6]	王霜，陈建生，周鹏,. 三层堤基中细砂层厚度对管涌影响的试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2847-2854.
[7]	徐长节，徐礼阁，孙凤明，於锦，杨迪,. 深基坑承压水的风险控制及处理实例[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 353-358.
[8]	陈建生，何海清，王霜，曾明明，王婷，何文政. 无黏性土管涌出砂及流量研究[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 623-630.
[9]	倪小东，赵帅龙，王媛 , . 考虑发育薄弱区对管涌发展影响的数学模型研究[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3627-3635.
[10]	胡亚元，马攀 . 三相耦合渗流侵蚀管涌机制研究及有限元模拟[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 913-921.
[11]	罗玉龙，吴强，詹美礼，盛金昌. 考虑应力状态的悬挂式防渗墙-砂砾石地基管涌临界坡降试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 73-78.
[12]	罗玉龙，罗谷怀. 洞庭湖区减压井井管及滤层结构试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 110-113.
[13]	陈群，刘黎，何昌荣，朱分清. 缺级粗粒土管涌类型的判别方法[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2249-2253.
[14]	毛昶熙，段祥宝. 关于渗流的力及其应用[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1569-1574.
[15]	毛昶熙，段祥宝，吴良骥. 砂砾土各级颗粒的管涌临界坡降研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3705-3709.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed